youcanhandlethetruth

Do you believe 911 was an inside job or are you a "conspiracy theorist" ?

1. Yes
2. Not sure
3. No

mkpdavies

I think something went on.

I'm still not sure what.

__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Roland

Thats my view. I don't necessarily even think bush was involved from the start.
But to much is being covered up the government over there could with out trouble put suspicions to rest but it does not.

So the question is why?

youcanhandlethetruth

Mass murder of the American population as a pretext to the "Patriot" act, Iraq war and "war on terror" maybe ?

jgrabham

Not sure.

VERY FISHY though

theyre covering something up...

__________________
Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... f**k with us.

Proudly increasing my CO2 output since 2007

"I'd have no desire to penalize a man because he's worthonly fifteen dollars a week. But I'll be damned if I can see why a man worth
forty must be penalized - and penalized in favor of the one who's less
competent."
- Ayn Rand

RTSTN

Lets get this right, your proposing that the the USA secret service would quite happily murder thousands of their own country men and women so they can go to war in Iraq?
The ''operation'' must have involved hundreds of secret agents all ready to murder thousands of their own people, come on.

If they did what to slaughter thousands of their own people, don't you think they might have just not involved themselves in a plot where the hundreds involved might one day say something?
Would it not have been easier to just arranged one guy in a 40 foot trailer packed with explosives?

They did not need an excuse to invade Iraq, they would have anyway, it just brought the invasion forward.

youcanhandlethetruth

I've done so many posts on this forum about 911 I haven't got the energy to do yet another one, so please look at my previous posts - you'll find loads of info there. (or watch loose change final cut on youtube/google video)

I recommend "terrorstorm" - (a history of government sponsored terror) there too.

In answer to your question - "don't you think they might have just not involved themselves in a plot where the hundreds involved might one day say something?"

You've got to understand they are evil - I'm sure you're a well meaning person, but you can't take the mindset of the average well meaning individual
and apply it to a bunch of murdering neo-con psychopaths.

Yes I admit they took a risk - a big risk and now it's being exposed, but that shows how much is at stake and how evil they are in their pursuit of word control.

Furthermore they have the mainstream media to support their cover up - I'm afraid the days of Watergate are over for now.

"Would it not have been easier to just arranged one guy in a 40 foot trailer packed with explosives?"

I can't exactly answer that but it had the effect that it convinced people that America was "under attack" by seeing the planes fly into the towers, but ironically the scientific evidence proves the buildings collapsed because of explosives and not because of fire or the planes.

Don't believe me though - examine it for yourself(if only to disprove me)
But a good starting point is Building 7 that was not hit be a plane or was not on fire, and BBC reported it fell 20 mintes before it fell !

"They did not need an excuse to invade Iraq, they would have anyway, it just brought the invasion forward." - possibly but it had the effect of allowing the government to take away the liberty of people in the name of freedom (patriot act, terrorism act) and was the pretext for the "war on terror"

Have you fully examined the evidence ?

I presume not but I notice you didn't vote "I haven't examined the evidence yet"

Believe me I don't waste my time warning people if it isn't of the most crucial importance. And don't think it's just the US that is in serious danger of fascist control - would I personally risk it if it was some "conspiracy theory"? Don't think so.....

The information is all over the internet(and on this forum where I've provided links) - get the information, swallow your pride and and warn everybody because your future depends on it(I'm not joking).

Good luck.

Roland

Thats what I always thought but if structured in the right way It could have not really taken that many people.

If those on the air craft, if the claim is true were all army ex army or worked in some kind of government department thought they were part of a staged hijacking.

It's more or less common knowledge now rather than conspiracy that there was a drill going on the morning of 9/11. It's also should be noted that those flights were not scheduled to fly. The capacity of seats that were filed was unusually low.

It would also in many ways bring unwitting parties into the conspiracy therefore they'd have to keep their mouths shut on top of this if you're dealing with people that psychotic and that powerful I'd say best keep your mouth shut. Would like at this point mention you don't here the fire workers that were there talk about the explosions they heard.

Oklahoma bombing started a campaign to under mine the constitution and start taking guns off the people. Again their was CCTV all around that building
yet the video's were not and will not be released. Eye witnesses also claim that their was a Arabian men with Timothy James McVeigh.

youcanhandlethetruth

9/11 Commission Ignored Firefighter's Account of Explosions Inside WTC

"If those on the air craft, if the claim is true were all army ex army or worked in some kind of government department thought they were part of a staged hijacking."

I've never heard that before, (and wouldn't be suprised) but I'm avoiding theories and sticking to the hard evidence.

You say "if the claim is true" - have you got any evidence or is it just a theory ?
Don't worry I won't label you a "conspiracy theorist" nutter ;o)
It's ok to have a theory, but when you have a theory with evidence to support it then it becomes fact.
And any additional theory does not eradicate the vast amount of evidence already proven with 911.

Silvbird

Hi folks, I'm new here & what made me decide to join was seeing this poll on 9/11. I used to be a member of the UK Left Network Yahoo Group but now they are blocking my posts & calling me a conspiracy theorist.
Absolute BS! 9/11 was an Inside Job as far as I am concerned, has anyone seen this film about Peak Oil? It covers 9/11 quite substantially & provides some of the best proof of the crime, 'evidence destruction' that I have seen.
Film called, Oil, Smoke & Mirrors: