9/11 poll

Roland · 14-02-2008, 05:49 PM

People find it ridiculous because they look through the world in their own eye's not through the eye's of political megalomaniacs who's only interest is wealth and power and see the population as little more than collateral or ant's in an ant nest that's in their back yard.

If you were to give the argument they would never get away with it well they are getting away with it.

If you we're to give the argument which many people do that they think they knew but let it happen then how does that make them less guilty.

Roland · 14-02-2008, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Hitler and Pol Pot may have done so in the expectation of their Thousand-year Reichs, but why would a democratically-elected government do such a thing?

For a start, how did they manage to get all these Muslim suicide freaks to die for the CIA?

A lot of the supposed hijackers are still alive and well and living in the middle east.

Their was a training drill that morning dealing with just such an attack if the people involved thought they were all part of an exersise then it would be the perfect way to get every one involved with out to much problem.

youcanhandlethetruth · 14-02-2008, 05:54 PM

Good last point.

Even if they let it happen(which does not explain scientific proof of bombs in the buildings, the dead hijackers turning up alive and the rest) then they are still guilty of not protecting the American people, though we're always told that it is the primary responsibility of any government to protect it's citizens.

Mikeuk · 14-02-2008, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth

Just answer me how Building 7 collapsed Mike...........

This site...

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7

effectively debunks the conspiracy nonsense.

youcanhandlethetruth · 14-02-2008, 06:02 PM

Look at my earlier post Mike where it says

"Yahoo! News - Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing into a building"

Don't you find it just a bit odd that they were doing a training exercise of crashing an airliner into a building on exactly the same day ?
I mean come on.........

If you look at 7/7 too you will find they had an identical training exercise at the exact same time and location.

If you don't beleive us, then please just take some time to refute the claims that I make even if only to disprove us all.

If you do that then I'll explain how a democratically elected government would do that to it's own people. Deal ?

youcanhandlethetruth · 14-02-2008, 06:09 PM

Mike,

In this thread, I've already posted a repsonse to the link you posted.
Also mkp has made a number of good points that need explaining.

Just there's no point in going round in circles again.

For_England · 14-02-2008, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth

Do you believe 911 was an inside job or are you a "conspiracy theorist" ?

1. Yes
2. Not sure
3. No

1. Yes and Yes.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth - Home

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice

For_England · 14-02-2008, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

This site...

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7

effectively debunks the conspiracy nonsense.

Does it explain how paper and plastic passports of the terrorists showed up in the rubble, but not the nigh-indestructable black boxes? How about the dodge events at the Pentegon, like the wing-span of the damage not being wide enough?

Scholars for 9/11 Truth - Full Member List

mkpdavies · 14-02-2008, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Hitler and Pol Pot may have done so in the expectation of their Thousand-year Reichs, but why would a democratically-elected government do such a thing?

For a start, how did they manage to get all these Muslim suicide freaks to die for the CIA?

Hitler was democratically elected I am afraid, so that doesn't hold much water on the "government wouldn't do such a thing" argument.

I don't care if people look at all the info and come to the conclusion that they are happy the government version is spot on. I don't accept the government wouldn't do such a thing argument though. Government have done and will do some pretty evil things from time to time.

I don't know if it was some massive government conspiracy or just a few rouge elements, or even just some of the owners of the buildings involved.

All I do know at this point, is the official explanation of WTC7 collapsing to the floor, is dubious beyond belief. To the point that I think at the every least, there is much more to that building collapsing, than we are told to believe. Until I see a creditable explanation, because I don't blindly accept governments won't do evil thing, I leave it open as a posibility. Especially given the anecdotal evidence that comes with it.

mkpdavies · 14-02-2008, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

This site...

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7

effectively debunks the conspiracy nonsense.

That's about the best effort I have seen yet and I fully agree that some in the "9/11 truth movement" play fast and loose with the facts.

I still don't see anything there that convinces me why the building fell the way it did though.

View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job ?
Yes	15	36.59%
No	22	53.66%
Not sure	4	9.76%
I haven't examined the evidence yet	0	0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

14-02-2008, 05:49 PM	#81 (permalink)
Roland Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 857	People find it ridiculous because they look through the world in their own eye's not through the eye's of political megalomaniacs who's only interest is wealth and power and see the population as little more than collateral or ant's in an ant nest that's in their back yard. If you were to give the argument they would never get away with it well they are getting away with it. If you we're to give the argument which many people do that they think they knew but let it happen then how does that make them less guilty.

14-02-2008, 05:54 PM	#83 (permalink)
youcanhandlethetruth Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,180	Good last point. Even if they let it happen(which does not explain scientific proof of bombs in the buildings, the dead hijackers turning up alive and the rest) then they are still guilty of not protecting the American people, though we're always told that it is the primary responsibility of any government to protect it's citizens.

14-02-2008, 06:02 PM	#85 (permalink)
youcanhandlethetruth Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,180	Look at my earlier post Mike where it says "Yahoo! News - Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing into a building" Don't you find it just a bit odd that they were doing a training exercise of crashing an airliner into a building on exactly the same day ? I mean come on......... If you look at 7/7 too you will find they had an identical training exercise at the exact same time and location. If you don't beleive us, then please just take some time to refute the claims that I make even if only to disprove us all. If you do that then I'll explain how a democratically elected government would do that to it's own people. Deal ?

14-02-2008, 06:09 PM	#86 (permalink)
youcanhandlethetruth Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,180	Mike, In this thread, I've already posted a repsonse to the link you posted. Also mkp has made a number of good points that need explaining. Just there's no point in going round in circles again.