9/11 poll

g hall · 13-02-2008, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frith

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics

Explains ALL of it enough for me (although I have seen other evidence)

Really it was the guy on the grassy knoll

mkpdavies · 13-02-2008, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

Explains ALL of it enough for me (although I have seen other evidence)

Really it was the guy on the grassy knoll

Can you explain the way WTC7 collapsed to me please. You seem certain, so you must have cleared that up in your head well. I need someone to do the same for me.

Frith · 13-02-2008, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

Explains ALL of it enough for me (although I have seen other evidence)

Really it was the guy on the grassy knoll

Ah, the Fool on the Hill.

Please explain it to Matt, g hall, because he just won't listen to any of these things and I've run out of evidence.

mkpdavies · 13-02-2008, 04:51 PM

No offence but not one thing you have posted has tried to explain WTC7, so it wasn't very good evidence.

Frith · 13-02-2008, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

No offence but not one thing you have posted has tried to explain WTC7, so it wasn't very good evidence.

I don't need as much convincing as you do. I think the zealots crashed two planes into two towers and the resultant inferno, falling rubble and chaos affected other buildings in the area. This is logical.

mkpdavies · 13-02-2008, 05:07 PM

Fine, I'm not trying to persuade you. If you are happy that steel buildings can collapse in complete symmetry like that, I envy you.

Roland · 13-02-2008, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Fine, I'm not trying to persuade you. If you are happy that steel buildings can collapse in complete symmetry like that, I envy you.

Three times in one day. All three buildings not only collapsing in the manor of a controlled demolition but in the manor of a perfect controlled demolition. This was an extraordinary world record as no steel framed building had ever fallen due to fire damage. Yet this time three in one day.

On top of this the pentagon where a plane supposedly crashed yet the CIA will not release footage of the plane landing and there are no parts of a plane to be scene except an small engine that would power a dingy.

On top of this flight 93 where is the evidence of wreckage. It seems to have disappeared. Maybe it was shipped in to Syria with saddams WMD's.

Roland · 13-02-2008, 05:37 PM

Should add to this you could argue well the vibratoins could have done it so lets make some comparisons.

Buildings partially collapsed by the 1999 earthquake in Taiwan.

Millennium3 · 13-02-2008, 08:08 PM

One of the key roots of suspicion for me is that the 9/11 attack gave the Bush administration the opportunity to attack [almost] any middle east nation if they could find some incriminating evidence. It does seem generally agreed that 9/11 gave the excuse for the invasion of Iraq based on fabricated evidence. Once it is accepted that the US administration is capable of such deception - almost any other deception seems possible.

I think I favour - they had found out it was going to happen through their under cover agents - but did not prevent it [by shooting down the planes], because of the opportunities it afforded them.

mkpdavies · 13-02-2008, 08:42 PM

For those who think a western government wouldn't dream of doing such a thing.

Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:

In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document lists methods (with, in some cases, outlined plans) the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. These are staged attacks purporting to be of Cuban origin, with a number of them having real casualties. Central to the plan was the use of "friendly Cubans"--Cuban exiles seeking to oust Fidel Castro.

View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job ?
Yes	15	36.59%
No	22	53.66%
Not sure	4	9.76%
I haven't examined the evidence yet	0	0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

13-02-2008, 04:51 PM	#54 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,181 Party: Libertarian Party	No offence but not one thing you have posted has tried to explain WTC7, so it wasn't very good evidence. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

13-02-2008, 05:07 PM	#56 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,181 Party: Libertarian Party	Fine, I'm not trying to persuade you. If you are happy that steel buildings can collapse in complete symmetry like that, I envy you. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

13-02-2008, 05:37 PM	#58 (permalink)
Roland Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 859	Should add to this you could argue well the vibratoins could have done it so lets make some comparisons. Buildings partially collapsed by the 1999 earthquake in Taiwan. Last edited by Roland; 13-02-2008 at 05:40 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

13-02-2008, 08:08 PM	#59 (permalink)
Millennium3 Moderator Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Berkshire Posts: 4,615	One of the key roots of suspicion for me is that the 9/11 attack gave the Bush administration the opportunity to attack [almost] any middle east nation if they could find some incriminating evidence. It does seem generally agreed that 9/11 gave the excuse for the invasion of Iraq based on fabricated evidence. Once it is accepted that the US administration is capable of such deception - almost any other deception seems possible. I think I favour - they had found out it was going to happen through their under cover agents - but did not prevent it [by shooting down the planes], because of the opportunities it afforded them.