British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job ?
Yes 15 36.59%
No 22 53.66%
Not sure 4 9.76%
I haven't examined the evidence yet 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-02-2008, 08:41 PM   #111 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 857
Roland is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartlepool View Post
ychtt,what I say is that half a dozen men with handtools could have replaced the central column boltings at a lower level with substitute substandard boltings,almost silently.
This could collapse the central columns as shown on video everywhere.
Explosions would be good but not absolutely necessary as bolt failure would occur with the slightest of movements of the building,(bolt shearing).

I'm not saying this is what caused any collapses of buildings of course.
I work in the construction industry so i've got a fair idea about structure etc..

Changing the bolts would be basically impossible and you would run to much risk given the wait of the structure their would be far to much chance of a small part of the collapsing or becoming visibly unstable. If this happened then the question would be raised why has some one changed the bolts.
Roland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 15-02-2008, 11:40 PM   #112 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,638
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

No answer to my question.

What would have been the advantage to the supposed 'conspirators' in demolishing the building?
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 12:34 AM   #113 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,180
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Look at this article:

The Dollar$ & $en$e Of 911

"Not surprisingly, the CIA occupied offices in the WTC-7, which mysteriously fell down. Wrote Richard: "Larry Silverstein invested $386 million in WTC 7. On 9/11, by his own admission, Larry Silverstein ordered the demolition of his building (for all intents and purposes a highly secure,US government building). In February of 2002, his company won a settlement of $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers."

Like the hundreds of millions of dollars in gold and silver that reportedly disappeared from beneath the imploded WTC-7. Here stood a stout steet US government building, recently purchased, that inexplicably fell down from a few fires. Remarkable. Down below, far below street level, a vault containing hundreds of millions in gold was pillaged in the seven hours between the first strike and the collapse of WTC-7.

Was the cunning, insider, masterplan to hijack the gold while Islamic terrorists carried out their suicide plot? Sounds believable, doesn't it? Only one problem. For the hijackers to escape and cover their tracks, they would need to blow the building. Which fell seven hours after the Twin Towers. As mentioned, the building housed the secret spy organization, the CIA, most adept at diabolical deeds and monitoring Al Qaeda.

And curiously, the WTC-7 also warehoused an enormous amount of Security & Exchange records. Was there a connection between the destruction of WTC-7 and the SEC records? These records pertained to investigations into corporate scams totaling hundreds of millions of dollars. You don't suppose someone could have?---no, that's an impossibility."

Anyway Mike, if you think a murderer found leaning over a victims body with a blooded knife isn't guilty because there's no proof, then please at least admit it looks suspicious.
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 12:35 AM   #114 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,180
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartlepool View Post
I think the demo preparation could easily have been done in a short time.

The reasons why, for me, are clearly shown within the list of occupants of 7WTC.

A massive list of US problems solved in 6.5 seconds it would seem.

American Presidential strategists would just jump at the chance offered by 7WTC being obliterated I'm afraid.
Hartlepool, you mention the list of people in WTC7 who were in the building - can you elaborate further on that please ? I'm interested to know more.
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 01:05 AM   #115 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 857
Roland is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk View Post
No answer to my question.

What would have been the advantage to the supposed 'conspirators' in demolishing the building?
I did.

Quote:
The insurance was just a bonus.
I left those clips one which gave tremendously good reasons for destroying building 7. So I take it you did not watch them.
Roland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 04:09 AM   #116 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,180
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Yes I forgot to point those clips out - Roland is right, they are very informative and give a lot more information than I possibly can.

What are you frightened of Mike ?
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 09:11 AM   #117 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North East England
Posts: 6,643
Party: Other
Hartlepool is just starting out
Default

ychtt,the Landlords list of 7WTC occupants was shown on this site via a video.If I find it I will let you know.With regard to the 2 Towers collapsing,seach me how that was controlled,unless a similar plan had been implimented as I describe below to Roland took place.Of course,all this collapsing could be the result of other factors which will perhaps always be unknown to us,one could also be good old gravity attraction downwards.

Roland,after spending forty odd years in the Construction industry as a Project Manager and Engineer I can assure you that changing out of column boltings is regular practice within the industry.Bolts are changed out on older buildings around the world every day,they are changed out one at a time,ie..one out,one back in, and, if you replaced some bolts with say 35% of substandard bolts a column would come down,not immediately,but quite soon.
So,a 24 bolt flange having only 9 bolts substituted would do the trick.
Doing this throughout the central columns at lowish level of a building would "control" the collapse.
Hartlepool is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 12:11 PM   #118 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,638
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
On 9/11, by his own admission, Larry Silverstein ordered the demolition of his building
He never admitted anything of the sort. That is a ridiculous suggestion.

Quote:
(for all intents and purposes a highly secure,US government building).
85,343 sq ft were occupied by the New York City Field Office of the US Secret Service. Most of the rest of the building was leased to banks and insurance companies including no less than 1,202,900 sq ft to Salomon Smith Barney. It was not a US government building.

Quote:
Like the hundreds of millions of dollars in gold and silver that reportedly disappeared from beneath the imploded WTC-7.
Reported by whom? Reputable sources please.

Quote:
far below street level, a vault containing hundreds of millions in gold was pillaged in the seven hours between the first strike and the collapse of WTC-7.
Who says? Reputable sources please.

Quote:
Was the cunning, insider, masterplan to hijack the gold while Islamic terrorists carried out their suicide plot? Sounds believable, doesn't it?
No.

Quote:
Only one problem. For the hijackers to escape and cover their tracks, they would need to blow the building. Which fell seven hours after the Twin Towers.
(1) How did the hijackers escape the plane crashes which killed all the passengers in the airliners? Ejector seats?

(2) Why did they need to blow building 7, and why did they wait 7 hours instead of doing it straight away and making their escape?

(3) I thought your theory was that it was 'blown' by Silverstein and his co-conspirators in the NY Fire Dept?

Quote:
As mentioned, the building housed the secret spy organization, the CIA, most adept at diabolical deeds and monitoring Al Qaeda.
The US Secret Service, which is tasked with federal investigations of financial crime and Presidential protection is not part of the CIA.

Quote:
And curiously, the WTC-7 also warehoused an enormous amount of Security & Exchange records.
Why is that curious? The building was fulll of banks and other financial institutions. Here's a link for the tenant list.

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/c...terTenants.xls

Last edited by Mikeuk; 16-02-2008 at 12:20 PM.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 01:56 PM   #119 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
For_England's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,689
For_England is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk View Post
OK, I've found it on the first site I quoted



If you read that passage calmly and sensibly it is apparent that the firefighters were at work in a block called the Verizon Building and were pulled out because '7 WTC' was in danger of collapsing on top of the Verizon Building.

Looks perfectly straightforward to me.
I think the out-of-context 'pull it' quote is one of those arguments that tends to discredit the more serious work of people like Scholars for 911 Truth.
For_England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2008, 03:30 AM   #120 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,180
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by For_England View Post
I think the out-of-context 'pull it' quote is one of those arguments that tends to discredit the more serious work of people like Scholars for 911 Truth.
That's not taken out of context that's exactly what he said.

Silverstein's Quote: (again ! )

"I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, you know, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is just pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

So maybe you're the one that's out of context.

Or do you mean his quote was "taken out of context" ?

If that's what you mean then what is the "it" referring to ? The firefighters ?

How thick do you think we are ?!!

(I don't mean the "911 truth movement", I mean the people who voted yes on this thread)

Or (more to the point) maybe I should ask "How thick are you ?"

Is my point totally lost on those without basic rationale ?
Or is it just a vain attempt to discredit anyone with common sense as biased ?(like the debunking 911 site)

Unless I'm missing somethign major here then someone with half a brain help me out please ?!!!!.....
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0