youcanhandlethetruth

You HAVE to watch this movie to understand where the world is heading and what parallels we face

Here is part 1 on youtube........

youcanhandlethetruth

The other 13 parts can be linked to on youtube(Copy the title and change the number part)

Having seen the film and followed Alex's work it's important to realise that:

1) Everything in the film is fully documented even if the docmentation cannot always be shown (that would be an impossible task in such a short 2 hour 20 min film).

2) What was shown by Alex's own admission was apprixamately only 2-5% of all the information that could have been included.

3) Each issue covered was covered in a brief way, and has been discussed at much longer length on his radio show which you can listen to on infowars.com or by the archive section of the website. For that reason some parts of the film can seem astounding or fiction-like, but that doesn't mean that in reality it's all a lot more extensive than the film may seem to suggest by it's succinctness.

4) Endgame2 is being planned by Alex.....

mkpdavies

Google has the whole lot in one section.

Quite good film, but I think he sees demons when there are none sometimes.

I can understand that, because once you are lies to a few time, you tend to distrust everything these same people say.

__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Roland

Watched it last night. Sorry just left another thread about it. This film would explain every thing. It would answer every great unanswered questions. Their greatest weapon seems to be ignorance of the fact they even exist. Not to good at all this thread thing so please get every one to watch it with a passion.

youcanhandlethetruth

I can see why you would say that, but Alex Jones says that everything in the film is based on documented evidence.

For_England

Alot of this stuff is good, useful information. But AJ is clearly mistaken when he treats the Eastern Establishment of the US as a global entity. I think Nick Griffin is right that the Bilderbergers et al have little to do with the EU, which is inspired by the French intellectual elite and their dream of a Eurabia to offset the power of the USA. In short, I think AJ is myopic. There is a ton of evidence, it seems to me, that 911 was an inside job, not least of all being the 'Project for a New American Century' which basically admitted that something bad would happen if they got into power, as an excuse to attempt a colonisation of the Mid East. Let's face it, only Americans would be stupid enough to think that the Mid East could beturned into an American colony. But the London bombing doesn't seem so obvious to me. And like David Duke and others, AJ doesn't seem to understandt he threat that Islam is. I don't think people in Europe have the luxury of such a delusion. The clash with Islam is far older than the New World Order which didn't really get going until the 1700s. AJ's fundamentalism makes him believe that Israel is great, and so automatically he wants to make every enemy of Israel a part of the NWO. I think Henry Makow has a much broader view, and is more likely to be on the right track on this one. Are the roots of the EU in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia? I don't know, but AJ likes to find the links for everything in Nazi Germany. The Soviet explanation sounds more realistic, and can present a continuity which the Nazi view struggles with. What was the anti-EU website that had all the information on it about the Soviet roots? Neo-Conservatism has its origins in Trotskyite communism, yet he is still trying to tie the Republicans to the Nazis, even though the best he can do is cite Arnie in California and George W.'s grandfather's trading. He conveniently forgets that Wall Street financed Hitler, as Makow points out and as Anthony Sutton documented. The neo-cons are far more consistent with the old-age capitalist dream of turning people in wage-slaves and mindless consumers, and eradicating all differences by destroying the family, religion, education and ethnic identities, with a powerful, largely white elite ruling over a greatly diminished global population. So he is right, but he is wrong. So for example he is quite ambivalent towards the BNP, even though they are very anti the NWO, pro family, pro classical education (their site is now advertising on the front page a book exposing the 'look say' method which John Dewey and others developed to destroy the American mind), pro religion, pro independence, pro freedom, pro guns etc etc. Of course nationalism has been hijacked for the past fifty years by nutters aligning it with Nazism, and arguably this has done more damage than the Frankfurt School and its 'march through the institutions' and imposition of multi-culturalism (a school, not surprisingly, AJ says little or nothing about - of course not, they were largely Jewish and Communist - but Makow, a Jew who lost his parents in Nazi Germany, has no problem talking about these things). Of course the BNP is right to not allow conspiracy theorists to peddle their wares publicly, as this would make them look even more insane. Who knows what NG really thinks of 911. Maybe he does believe the official story, I don't now. Well my rantings are at an end for now, since I've run out of things to say and this post isn't really going anywhere.

youcanhandlethetruth

Some interesting thoughts bnpforme.....

You are obviously quite knowledgable about many things.
I have some questions for you if you don't mind.......

"I think Nick Griffin is right that the Bilderbergers et al have little to do with the EU" - well you may be right. I don't know all the stuctures and interactions of power that exist between the power brokers and their institutions, but surely you agree with the film that the EU was set up by the elite for the purpose of one world government ?


You say "There is a ton of evidence, it seems to me, that 911 was an inside job" but then, "Of course the BNP is right to not allow conspiracy theorists to peddle their wares publicly, as this would make them look even more insane."

Isn't this hippocrisy ? Who cares what people think about you if you are speaking the truth ?
It's the conditioning that makes us all deny the truth - the idea that you have to sound like you're saying the right thing, even if someone(like government for example) are downright lying. Surely you agree with me on this one ?

You say "the London bombing doesn't seem so obvious to me." - well it could not be as obvious as 911 - (nothing could be that obvious) but have you watched terrorstorm ? Do you realise there was a drill at exactly the same time and location as the attack ? Do you know the chance of that ? Actuaries have calculated about 1 in 100000000000000000000000000 or something like that.... Have you heard the witness accounts that said there was no muslim on the bus and the bomb was underneath the train ?

I recommend you visit The 4th Bomb By Daniel Obachike - Quick Delivery

You see you say "AJ doesn't seem to understandt he threat that Islam is" but when you accept 911 and 7/7 as inside jobs, what is the islamic threat then ? Minimal. You are 400-600 times more likely to die in a car accident than to die of terrorism, so why all the media hype about islamic extremism ?
We are being sold a phoney, and we better admit it. Of course yes there are some extremists but the threat is hyped to fool us thinking we have to give up our freedom in the name of freedom and fighting "terror".

"AJ says little or nothing about multiculturalism" - well thats another issue outside of the film, but he pretty hacked off with illegal Mexican immigration which is taking over the states. Though he knows the people are just being used as pawns in a chess game.

"AJ's fundamentalism makes him believe that Israel is great" - where do you get that idea from ?!!! I think you're way off course there.....

I know you want to come at the problem from a racial standpoint, but please understand it is the government who are to blame, not the muslims...

Ok sorry rant over.

youcanhandlethetruth

by the way forgot to mention, Alex Jones claims continuation of government in the USA is now under UN control ! I must try to find an article about that....

For_England

Who knows all the interactions - I know I don't. But yes, I totally agree all these trans-national organisations have a ultimate goal of world government. Somehow it all coellesces together; it's madness. I can understand David Ike saying lizard men are behind it all! It's just so crazy that worldwide our leaders are selling us out, as though with one mind.


Well, I don't know what they really believe. I only know that I think it's sensible, and that at the end of the day what is important is that we have a BNP government, which is the only thing which stands between our freedom and being part of the NWO.

I don't think we have the time now. People don't want to listen. We are considered nutters. Let internet warriors fight for this, but I don't see it would do any good politically.

Yes, though I thought the BNP explanation was very believable: basically that they knew something was going to happen so they put the drill in place as a cover to try to stop it without causing widespread fear.


Yes, I had forgotten about the picture showing an outward explosion from the floor. Good point. That is strong evidence.

Okay. I admit I haven't looked into 7/7 nearly as much as 911.


I do believe Islam is a serious threat, and I think perhaps the elites have bitten off more than they can chew. Of course they bring these people over, then use their presence as an excuse to take away our freedoms. It's disgraceful. Whether the attacks are staged or not, Muslims do do attacks, and the are committed to taking over the world. I think the socialist element in Europe does sincerely believe that the Muslims are their ally in bringing about global socialism. They are very mistaken. Perhaps the elites want us to have a massive European-wide war with Islam, and will use that as an excuse to wipe out the Middle East. I don't know, but Islam is not benign.

Yes, he rightly views it as part of the process of destroying the US, and I agree with alot of what he says. I think I've been ticked off at him for being so negative towards the BNP. But he doesn't appreciate the need for people to live in their own ethnic groups - nationalism. Except for Israel - he accepts their right.
I have to go. I'll finish later.

For_England

Well, I think it is very easy for people to blame one group, and then to try to fit all the information into that. Nutzies blame the Jews, and won't accept any information that doesn't agree with that. Others blame the Jesuits, the Freemasons, international bankers, the Royal Family, the Vatican, lizard-men, or some combination, and they won't accept any info that disagrees. AJ says alot of good stuff, but you won't find any mention of the Israeli Mossad agents dancing, videorecording and celebrating the ruins of the WTC on the night of 911. Why not? So I tend to distrust him, since he clearly tries to find the roots of the NWO in Nazism, as something diametrically opposed to Israel. Nazism in fact was financed by Wall Street, as was the Russian Revolution, as Anthony Sutton demonstrated in his books. The roots of neo-conservatism are in socialism, not nazism, and ditto for the EU. I very much doubt Bush and his cronies wish to create a white racial super race along Nazi lines. If they were, why are they so in favour of Mexican immigration? They are globalists and internationalists, who would be content to wipe out all ethnic differences and the independent status of all nation states. They want hedonism and consumerism to be the gods of the new world, not Christianity or even germanic paganism. They are materialists and naturalists. They want the world amalgamated into one large and predictable mass of consumers who care about nothing but themselves - basically they want everyone looking like the stereotypical spoilt brat American. But, of course, ruled over by the old elites. And it seems to be working, except in the Middle East where they seem to have misjudged (though maybe those pay-rolling them didn't misjudge - order out of chaos). I think this fundamental misjudgement by AJ makes him unreliable in some ways. People like Henry Mackow are far more reliable, in my opinion.


As for the Muslims, if someone lets the enemy into the gate, they are a traitor. But that doesn't make the ones they let in friends. Whether the powers that be are using Islam because they want to create global war, or because they mistakenly thought they could use them to create a Eurabia or for whatever reason, the fact is European civilisation has been at war with Islam since its inception, and if it wasn't intent of Jihad, they wouldn't be such a useful tool.