![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,758
Party: Conservatives
![]() |
Although I'm obviously not familiar with this property it sounds to me as if the surveyor is being much too cautious.
Bressumer (note spelling) beams above old shopfronts frequently decay and have to be replaced, but if there is no visible evidence of failure he should either simply draw the possibility to your attention or specify further investigation with work to be carried out only if a serious defect is revealed. Im not quite sure why he wants the lintols replaced. In a pre 1914 building these would most likely be brick arches which are often prone to slip. Later buildings feature reinforced concrete lintols, where reinforcement can corrode, or soldier brick arches on steel bars - also subject to corrosion. It would be very rare to find that all lintols were immediately in need of replacement. If your builder states that much of this work is unnecessary and assuming you have not already had the work done I would go to your broker immediately and ask him to approach the lender to ask for the requirements to be reduced accordingly. The lender will pass this documentation to the surveyor for his comments. This happens all the time as I can confirm from personal experience. If you are paying £90,000 for the property it would be unusual for the surveyor to place a higher value on it in its existing state. Still, given the evidence you hold of a couple of higher bids, it will be worth throwing this into the pot together with your printouts from Rightmove. Remember that the figures shown on Rightmove are asking prices even where properties have been sold STC, so you will want to phone the agents concerned to check the actual or anticipated sale prices. You can also access free sites such as 'our property' for Land Registry records of sale prices. It's no good complaining to your broker 'once it is all over'. It will be too late then. Last edited by Mikeuk; 10-12-2007 at 09:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: nottinghanshire
Posts: 758
![]() |
It appears that the central banks decision to release billions to lenders means the credit supply will not dry up just yet. I think you may be right Mike. More credit, more 125% mortgages and more house price inflation.
I wonder if the first bank to take the BOE up on their offer will find a stream of customers outside their branches wanting to withdraw their savings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,758
Party: Conservatives
![]() |
Quote:
A lot of this recklessness has depended on the expectation that prices would rapidly rise to cover 100%+ advances. That expectations has gone and lenders are not going to stick their necks out now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erewhon
Posts: 5,638
![]() |
ALL properties now need HIPS I think this will hit the market a bit, depends how many buy to let bail out because they can't afford it .
Proposal if you have a buy to let you should have to pay business rates If you have a second personal property you should pay 2 times the tax and 3 if your third personal property
__________________
"That government is best which governs least." "This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries". "To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful." TANSTAAFL TANJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: nottinghanshire
Posts: 758
![]() |
Quote:
Of course, most will decide their house is worth the ridiculous price it was valued at a few months ago and refuse to sell any lower. A friend whose house has been on the market for 4 months has had one viewing but refuses to lower the price. Oh no, EA redundancies ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
Am I only only house owner who wants a massive crash? I don't care if my house halves in value. That will be the time I upgrade.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: nottinghanshire
Posts: 758
![]() |
Quote:
Bit like that w****r Morgan on QT last night bragging about how much he has made due to house price inflation. Meanwhile the whole country loses it's head with 125% and six times salary mortgages. The sooner we all treat houses as places to live rather than a means to get rich quick the better. Then maybe future generations can afford one too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,758
Party: Conservatives
![]() |
Quote:
Likewise it ought to be of advantage to first-time buyers. Unfortunately any such crash - which would be a symptom of a more general malaise - would probably be accompanied by negative indicators across the economy, including increased unemployment and shortage of mortgage funds, so in the real world the prospects would be rosy for very few indeed. Multimillionaires with large cash deposits would be laughing, of course. But I agree that we must get out of the mindset which supposes that a fall in prices is inevitably a bad thing. It's time that we snapped out of the language which conditions that mindset. One phrase I particularly detest is 'property ladder' with its false implication that nearly everybody is going to spend their lives moving to ever bigger and more expensive homes. It's a dangerous assumption. Last edited by Mikeuk; 15-12-2007 at 10:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]