British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-09-2007, 03:23 PM   #21 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Lady Britannia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 9
Lady Britannia is just starting out
Default

Just a follow-on thought.

What in other posters' opinions constitutes being seen as an intellectual heavyweight - i.e. is it ability to ask questions, pick holes in an argument, facility in stating one's case, etc?

Unfortunately I have seen too often someone with some really valid points being demolished by their more skilled opponents.
Lady Britannia is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 18-09-2007, 03:32 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 695
Ian C is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
..someone with some really valid points being demolished by their more skilled opponents.
Members of the Bar,
They carry more weight in legal circles (for obvious reasons) regardless of argument.


Having said that I don't regard Barristers as intellectually heavyweight - they are just doing a job.

Last edited by Ian C; 18-09-2007 at 03:34 PM. Reason: added afterthought
Ian C is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2007, 04:18 PM   #23 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,987
Aardvark has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian C View Post
Members of the Bar,
Having said that I don't regard Barristers as intellectually heavyweight - they are just doing a job.
It's a job you can't do though isn't it?

The Bar qualification is a post-graduate degree. Last time I checked it required an entry requirement of a 2.1 or better. It used to require any honours degree, but I took the Bar Finals in the year that pretty well everyone with a third in their first degree failed and the limit was raised to 2.2. I scraped a third at the Bar and drank my way to a 2.2 in my first degree (back in the days when a 2.2 was acceptable in a world with a lot less graduates). I couldn't get pupillage, the practical training, in a competitive world (1000+ took the exam, 750 or so passed it and there were only 150 pupillages in England and Wales, including those taken by overseas students). The Barristers in my year who went on to practice were incredibly clever people, often with 2 other degrees, and some of them I would consider amongst the finest minds I have ever had the pleasure of dealing with (who does a post-graduate degree in their third or fourth language?).

It is not always obvious, when watching sausage machine justice, that there has been a lot of careful thought and preparation. The best prepared cases are the ones where very little is said or done as everyone has ensured they've followed all of the procedures and has limited their questions to getting only the relevant information. That requires a lot of knowledge and an incisive mind. Often **** ups revolve around clients and witnesses surprising their own counsel with sudden changes in their stories and it is not the fault of the lawyers who have been misled.

If anyone thinks becoming a Barrister is easy just pop out and get the qualification.
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008
Aardvark is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2007, 05:06 PM   #24 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,015
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Britannia View Post
Just a follow-on thought.

What in other posters' opinions constitutes being seen as an intellectual heavyweight - i.e. is it ability to ask questions, pick holes in an argument, facility in stating one's case, etc?
Perhaps an ability to understand and convey a complex mater simply, precisely, and with clarity?
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0