If a new anti EU party were formed 3

g hall · 15-08-2007, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Millennium3

Yes - almost every other thread seems to be aimed at rubbishing the IPCC's work. Perhaps Exxon Mobile's largess extends even this far!

No hidden agenda then ?

Millennium3 · 15-08-2007, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

No hidden agenda then ?

Not sure what you mean.

Besoeker · 15-08-2007, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eublues

Nuclear power plus renewables principally. Drastically cut the use of gas for electricity generation - likewise imported coal.

I agree with the aims.
One problem is that getting new nuclear on line isn't going to be quick. Probably a decade or so at best. In the meantime, to meet demand, we will have to continue to import coal and gas.

g hall · 16-08-2007, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Millennium3

Not sure what you mean.

In monosyllables then
You are saying that Exxon are giving money to posters to attack the IPCC stance i.e. Bribery

Is that clear enough

Millennium3 · 16-08-2007, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

In monosyllables then
You are saying that Exxon are giving money to posters to attack the IPCC stance i.e. Bribery

Is that clear enough

When you asked if there was a hidden agenda - I thought you might be referring to the purpose of the poll and I was having difficulty making a connection.

No I am not seriously suggesting that anyone is taking bribes from Exxon - that would be incredible. However, I do also find it incredible that anyone can continue to maintain that mankind activities is not effecting the climate. This, particularly now [after the report in yesterday's Daily Mail] that the US Government [practically the last bastion for the denyers] has admitted that climate change has been caused by the burning of fossil fuel.

Mind you, not so comforting when they also say that things are now so far gone that it is not worth taking any preventative action. Beautiful!

Millennium3 · 16-08-2007, 07:22 PM

Does anyone know the number of votes to be expected in a poll on this forum?

bigred · 16-08-2007, 08:15 PM

Put Poll 1 and 3 together and and there won't be much space left.

Wind turbines on poles, then a Pole and so on!

John Carter · 16-08-2007, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

In monosyllables then
You are saying that Exxon are giving money to posters to attack the IPCC stance i.e. Bribery

I'll do it!

Where's my cheque, Exxon?

mkpdavies · 16-08-2007, 08:31 PM

I must be due some cash by now.

Millennium3 · 16-08-2007, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Carter

I'll do it!

Where's my cheque, Exxon?

Have I missed a category? Exxon should increase their slush fund manyfold!

View Poll Results: Should it's policy on climate change be:
The IPCC are correct - the recommended levels of C02 emissions should be it's goal	3	17.65%
The IPCC are probably correct - all reasonable efforts should be made to achieve recommended targets	2	11.76%
the IPCC might be correct - some effort should be made to achieve recommended targets	3	17.65%
The IPCC are wrong - climate change has no bearing on mankinds activities	9	52.94%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

16-08-2007, 08:31 PM	#19 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	I must be due some cash by now. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

16-08-2007, 07:22 PM	#16 (permalink)
Millennium3 Moderator Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Berkshire Posts: 3,970	Does anyone know the number of votes to be expected in a poll on this forum?

16-08-2007, 08:15 PM	#17 (permalink)
bigred Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Lancashire Posts: 100	Put Poll 1 and 3 together and and there won't be much space left. Wind turbines on poles, then a Pole and so on!