British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything
Should gun ownership be legalised? Should gun ownership be legalised?
Register Social Groups Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
View Poll Results: Should gun ownership be legalised?
Yes 10 50.00%
No 10 50.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20-02-2007, 12:29 AM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
The posts above tell me England is now a nation of cowards.
I really cant say more than that!
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 20-02-2007, 12:31 AM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,003
Feldoon is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryaldridge
I kind of support most of what the Libertarian Alliance says here on gun ownership.
Restricting gun ownership clearly does not help reduce gun crime as has been pointed out - some countries with more liberal laws have fewer gun crimes and some have more. So the real cause of gun crime has nothing to do with access to guns but something else. Therefore guns should not be targetted but rather the cause behind the crimes.

The right to self defence is a natural liberty that should be protected by Government.
We know the cause but can not say.
That cause is...?
Feldoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2007, 12:34 AM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryaldridge
I kind of support most of what the Libertarian Alliance says here on gun ownership.
Restricting gun ownership clearly does not help reduce gun crime as has been pointed out - some countries with more liberal laws have fewer gun crimes and some have more. So the real cause of gun crime has nothing to do with access to guns but something else. Therefore guns should not be targetted but rather the cause behind the crimes.

The right to self defence is a natural liberty that should be protected by Government.
We know the cause but can not say.
That cause is...?
We can not say.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2007, 12:40 AM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,003
Feldoon is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
We can not say.
What's stopping you from saying it?
Feldoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2007, 08:57 AM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 650
allanon is just starting out
Default
I suppose we'll have to pass over in silence then.
allanon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2007, 10:14 AM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,912
harryaldridge is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to harryaldridge
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryaldridge
I kind of support most of what the Libertarian Alliance says here on gun ownership.
Restricting gun ownership clearly does not help reduce gun crime as has been pointed out - some countries with more liberal laws have fewer gun crimes and some have more. So the real cause of gun crime has nothing to do with access to guns but something else. Therefore guns should not be targetted but rather the cause behind the crimes.

The right to self defence is a natural liberty that should be protected by Government.
We know the cause but can not say.
That cause is...?
We can not say.
I do not know what the cause is. My point is simply that the government approach is to use a blunt instrument to affect the outcome. i.e. ban gun ownership to reduce gun crime. However this might or might not work but the government should try to target the real cause otherwise they are iinflicting repressive measures on others.

The goal should be to target the cause to affect the outocme, not just try to regulate, legislate and clamp down on related issues along the way which just lead to complications and distortions and do not solve the real problem.
harryaldridge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2007, 06:16 PM   #27 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 314
blank_frackis is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryaldridge
I kind of support most of what the Libertarian Alliance says here on gun ownership.
Restricting gun ownership clearly does not help reduce gun crime as has been pointed out - some countries with more liberal laws have fewer gun crimes and some have more. So the real cause of gun crime has nothing to do with access to guns but something else. Therefore guns should not be targetted but rather the cause behind the crimes.

The right to self defence is a natural liberty that should be protected by Government.
We know the cause but can not say.
That cause is...?
We can not say.
Are the words you'd like to use "Johnny" and "foreigner"? Otherwise I'm not sure what you're talking about either.
blank_frackis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2007, 07:27 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,003
Feldoon is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by blank_frackis
Are the words you'd like to use "Johnny" and "foreigner"? Otherwise I'm not sure what you're talking about either.
I'm under the same presumption.
Feldoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:21 AM.

Contact Us - British Democracy Forum - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0