British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything
Should UKIP bring back Section 28? Should UKIP bring back Section 28?
Register Social Groups Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
View Poll Results: Should UKIP bring back Section 28?
Yes 27 60.00%
No 18 40.00%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
Page 4 of 10 « First < 23 4 56 > Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-01-2007, 04:24 PM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
I would teach kids about hetrosexual sex in biology.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 29-01-2007, 04:25 PM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
We must fight tooth and nail to keep young boys out of the hands of homosexuals.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 29-01-2007, 04:29 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,003
Feldoon is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
I would teach kids about hetrosexual sex in biology.
Agreed.

That's where sexual education belongs.

However sexual education shouldn't be limited to heterosexual sex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
We must fight tooth and nail to keep young boys out of the hands of homosexuals.
That's a rather stupid thing to say.

If homosexuality was this "choice" as you like to tout around (which evidence strongly points towards it being either natural or caused because of nurture at a young age), why would people "choose" homosexuality whilst it's so prejudiced against?
Feldoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 29-01-2007, 04:30 PM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
No one under 16 should be exposed to homosexuality in any way.
And why not?

Furthermore; should they be exposed to any sort of sexuality?
Because decent parants dont want their children exposed to Homosexuality in any form.
I have met not one single person who wants their kids taught about homosexuality.
Describe "decent". I assume you mean "bigoted".
Also; Your anecdotal evidence counts for nothing. I wish I had been taught more about sexual freedom for my pathetic excuse for a sex education.

Answer my second question too, please.
A bigot is aperson with fixed and intolerant belief.

My view was that homosexuals where just like hetrosexuals however after looking into the stats of homosexual levels of paedophilia, drug use, amount of sexual partners etc I have changed my belief.
I now would object to Homosexuals being allowed to adopt children.
Thus because I have changed my belief I can no be a bigot.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 29-01-2007, 04:32 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
I would teach kids about hetrosexual sex in biology.
Agreed.

That's where sexual education belongs.

However sexual education shouldn't be limited to heterosexual sex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
We must fight tooth and nail to keep young boys out of the hands of homosexuals.
That's a rather stupid thing to say.

If homosexuality was this "choice" as you like to tout around (which evidence strongly points towards it being either natural or caused because of nurture at a young age), why would people "choose" homosexuality whilst it's so prejudiced against?
Do you think people or born Paedophiles too or born with an interest in sex with animals?

As for homosexuality being prejudiced against you must be joking.
Its now promoted more than ever before.
Jobs are now even reserved for homosexuals.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 29-01-2007, 04:35 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,003
Feldoon is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
No one under 16 should be exposed to homosexuality in any way.
And why not?

Furthermore; should they be exposed to any sort of sexuality?
Because decent parants dont want their children exposed to Homosexuality in any form.
I have met not one single person who wants their kids taught about homosexuality.
Describe "decent". I assume you mean "bigoted".
Also; Your anecdotal evidence counts for nothing. I wish I had been taught more about sexual freedom for my pathetic excuse for a sex education.

Answer my second question too, please.
A bigot is aperson with fixed and intolerant belief.
Not necessarily.

Quote:
My view was that homosexuals where just like hetrosexuals however after looking into the stats of homosexual levels of paedophilia, drug use, amount of sexual partners etc I have changed my belief.
That's a false causality flaw though.

Being homosexual doesn't bring those around.

Quote:
I now would object to Homosexuals being allowed to adopt children.
Which is bigotry and discrimination.

Quote:
Thus because I have changed my belief I can no be a bigot.
So say the new converts to the BNP.
Changing viewpoint =/= Immune from being a bigot.
Feldoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 29-01-2007, 04:37 PM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
No one under 16 should be exposed to homosexuality in any way.
And why not?

Furthermore; should they be exposed to any sort of sexuality?
Because decent parants dont want their children exposed to Homosexuality in any form.
I have met not one single person who wants their kids taught about homosexuality.
Describe "decent". I assume you mean "bigoted".
Also; Your anecdotal evidence counts for nothing. I wish I had been taught more about sexual freedom for my pathetic excuse for a sex education.

Answer my second question too, please.
A bigot is aperson with fixed and intolerant belief.
Not necessarily.

Quote:
My view was that homosexuals where just like hetrosexuals however after looking into the stats of homosexual levels of paedophilia, drug use, amount of sexual partners etc I have changed my belief.
That's a false causality flaw though.

Being homosexual doesn't bring those around.

Quote:
I now would object to Homosexuals being allowed to adopt children.
Which is bigotry and discrimination.

Quote:
Thus because I have changed my belief I can no be a bigot.
So say the new converts to the BNP.
Changing viewpoint =/= Immune from being a bigot.
By definition if you have changed your view you can not be a bigot.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 29-01-2007, 04:37 PM   #38 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Do you think people or born Paedophiles too or born with an interest in sex with animals?
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 29-01-2007, 04:39 PM   #39 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,003
Feldoon is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
I would teach kids about hetrosexual sex in biology.
Agreed.

That's where sexual education belongs.

However sexual education shouldn't be limited to heterosexual sex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
We must fight tooth and nail to keep young boys out of the hands of homosexuals.
That's a rather stupid thing to say.

If homosexuality was this "choice" as you like to tout around (which evidence strongly points towards it being either natural or caused because of nurture at a young age), why would people "choose" homosexuality whilst it's so prejudiced against?
Do you think people or born Paedophiles too or born with an interest in sex with animals?
I don't understand what you're trying to say here due to some mesh of an attempt at English. Proof-read and ask again please. I'll be willing to answer.

Quote:
As for homosexuality being prejudiced against you must be joking.
I am not.

Quote:
Its now promoted more than ever before.
Thankfully.

Quote:
Jobs are now even reserved for homosexuals.
Well I'd very much doubt a straight person would want to work at a gay bar.
Furthermore, do you find it acceptable to be prejudiced against homosexuals because certain things are prejudiced for them?
Wouldn't it be a better solution to battle the prejudism for homosexuals rather than be prejudiced against them?
Feldoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 29-01-2007, 04:41 PM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,003
Feldoon is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
By definition if you have changed your view you can not be a bigot.
Really?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dictionary.com
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
Source

I'd say that's not stopping people who've changed their opinion from being a bigot.
Feldoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Closed Thread
Page 4 of 10 « First < 23 4 56 > Last »

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Contact Us - British Democracy Forum - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0