British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-01-2007, 05:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,604
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default Brown and the Bilderbergers.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo...g_question.htm

Quote:
Brown Answers Bilderberg Question
By getting a lower minister to refuse to answer it

Infowars.net | January 16, 2007
Steve Watson

Last week we reported how British MP, Norman Baker, who had previously asked Prime Minister Tony Blair to reveal details of any Bilderberg meetings he has attended, has also now officially asked the current Chancellor of the Exchequer, and most likely next Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, to reveal details of his own attendances at Bilderberg.

Baker's question has now been "answered", but not by Brown himself, by John Healey, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury. The question and "answer" appeared today in the parliamentary records :

Norman Baker: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer in which years since 1997 (a) he and (b) other Treasury Ministers have attended meetings of the Bilderberg Group. [115142]

John Healey: Treasury Ministers and officials have meetings with a wide range of organisations and individuals in the public and private sectors as part of the process of policy development and delivery. As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of all such meetings.

Translation: The government is not accountable, it can meet to form and implement policy with whichever unelected officials and foreign business interests it chooses without telling you anything.
That'll be a yes then.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 18-01-2007, 05:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of all such meetings.
The previous administrations weren't subject to a Freedom of Information Act. Surely one could apply under the Act for this information?
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2007, 06:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,911
harryaldridge is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to harryaldridge
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernUKIP
Quote:
As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of all such meetings.
The previous administrations weren't subject to a Freedom of Information Act. Surely one could apply under the Act for this information?
Ah. But freedom of information only applies to information that the government dont mind people knowing.
harryaldridge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2007, 06:05 PM   #4 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harryaldridge
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernUKIP
Quote:
As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of all such meetings.
The previous administrations weren't subject to a Freedom of Information Act. Surely one could apply under the Act for this information?
Ah. But freedom of information only applies to information that the government dont mind people knowing.
So very true
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0