You see ..... you really do not get it do you?
What you have said reveals the fallacy ......
You are still thinking in the same old way - the same old tired blinkered, short-sighted traditional party politics sort of way: just like the tired old blinkered short-sighted LibLabCon.
You are wanting a "quid pro quo" for UKIP (just another political party) and do not for a moment think about the "quid pro quo" for the country - and hence us all.
You should learn to play chess and then you will understand the value of sacrificing a piece for the sake of winning the game. (or getting you into a better position to do so).
DED.
As with Geoffrey Collier - still thinking in the same old tired, boring, useless, traditionally selfish, stupid, pathetically inept, political party way..... tribaly !
We have to be radical, free, and with lateral thinking, if we are going to change things radically for Britain within British politics. There is no other way.
The Lib Lab Con have progressed in the same old decrepit way for over forty years ... and look where it has got us ... time for UKIP to break the mould, break free and 'go for it'.
DED.
Last edited by douglas denny; 11-04-2010 at 06:50 PM.
Dougals Denny: Unlike you I have never supported, voted for, or stood as a parliamentary candidate for, any party which has supported The Treaty of Rome. You fail on all three counts. Goldsmith opposed the Maastricht Treaty, you may remember, because it UNDERMINED the Treaty of Rome. At the last GE, Pearson supported UKIP until the last moment when he advised all their members to vote Conservative. That is why we should never have trusted him. If you manage UKIP's affairs in such a way that you assist in providing the Conservatives with a workable majority, you become culpable when they tell you in advance that they will be working hard to see Tukey admitted to the EU. Should Labour do exactlly the same thing in respect of Turkey, at least we are not assisting them. Are you seriously arguing that UKIP's case will be advanced by the largest EU member state being Muslim? So UKIP's policy now involves assisting to elect a Conservative government, even if that entails the Single European Act, (the free movement of goods, capital, labour and services) applying equally to Turkey? When it comes to migration UKIP are now up-front with the Lib-Dem-Con-Lab. which effectively is an open-door policy where the EU is concerned. The Conservative policy in respect of Turkey alone, is incompatible with UKIP's objectives; they should be, therefore, just like the others, a proscribed party. Anyway, Douglas, now tell us how much money we have in the coffers to pay our legal bill after June 7th? Having helped to elect a Conservative government; Pearson may them deem our work done and petition for bankruptcy.
Good idea. Good.
If you take a look at the many postings about the farcical burka ban, you'll see that Douglas Denny made clear that the rules were changed some time ago enabling the party leader to make whatever policy he feels like on the spur of the moment with no consultation. If he is having a good day, you'll get a good policy, like this one. If he is having a bad day, you'll get a burka ban. This needs fixing. Maybe one day he'll wake up convinced that the party needs a restoration of internal democracy and an enhanced role for the NEC. Who knows, it could happen.
Geoffrey
Lord Pearson has been quite clear that his strategy is to help force a hung parliament in the hopes that this will lead to a referendum on our relationship with the EU.
If you want to criticise that stratgey fine (I agree it is doomed to failure) but don't waste your time criticising him for something which he isn't trying to do (help elect a Tory government).
Bookmarks