The state legitimately owns nothing. All land should be treated as unowned until peacefully homesteaded by individuals or private bodies, as their private property. They can charge parking fines if they want; but as for the state... again, none.collect parking fines,
I prefer restitution to punishment precisely because I don't think it should be at my, or anybody else but the criminal's expense.impose punishments and in fact do anything at your expense.
I am, but candyflipper isn't. He is a more moderate libertarian than myself, but regardless, we both think that peaceful people should be at liberty to do as they choose with their person and property, or that of consenting others; and that the only legitimate use of violence is to secure this liberty by impartially enforcing known and clear laws against force, fraud and theft. Use of one's person includes consuming plant food to gain halicinogenic and euphoric experiences.It would seem that you are an anarchist.
Nobody is advocating legalising burglary. Please stay on topic.Having been burgled by druggies I certainly do buy into the dangers.
Because peaceful people should be at liberty to do as they choose with what is theirs. Nobody hurts anybody else by taking drugs, in the sense of harming or depriving them of their person or property, or by buying them, or by selling them to those that want to buy them.I see no reason why this so-called choice should be available to anybody and would stamp it out with maximum ruthlessness.
Just mind your own business.
Your actions cause the very thing you seek to prevent.
However, I wouldn't expect someone who admires the work of communist China to not be at least a little bit foolish and confused.
When goods do not cross borders, soldiers will.
A state informed by classical liberal principles would ban with maximum ruthlessness those who would violate other people's self-ownership rights.