Three new parties added

[chuckles]

Why not have a forum for the British Freedom Party.

It already has a councillor, unlike 90 % of the ones that have their own forum.

Its constitution is not racist and anyone can join the party.

According to the forums own criteria, I cannot see why they alone are not entitled to have their own forum - unless the agenda is simply to repress them for the benefit of UKIP, which brings the whole sites motivations into question.

[blueblood1920]

Is there any chance of British Freedom getting our own section?

[blue1942]

Yes, the " British Freedom Party".

I added the Christian Party, the Christian Peoples Alliance and Integrity UK to the smaller parties category.

Are there any more that might get some discussion here?

[Fleet Nine]

And the majority of the electorate, who reject the UKIP at the General Election!

Given that no one party got anything remotely close to a majority you could say that majority of the electorate rejected every party......

[drewish]

TUSC (the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition) is still going strong and is fielding 150 candidates in May's local elections - could this be added to the smaller parties, rather than a "dead party"? Most candidates are standing with the logo TUSC AGAINST CUTS.

[Richard Allen]

TUSC was moved to the dead parties section as we, I probably should say I, had assumed it was simply an umbrella group for the general election. Given their candidates this year it probably should be moved back.

[Anthony Butcher]

I have moved it back to the Small Parties section

[Aardvark]

Why not give race_inspector his own section? Then he can talk to himself all day long without upsetting everyone else.