Lets not get to excited about all this boys, the facts are that not many will vote bnp and even less of them will join up. Dick Griffin is a very poor leader, in fact hes scared to death of the UKIP thats why most of his deciples try to diss them on here.
MY ADVICE TO READERS IS NOT TO JOIN OR VOTE FOR THE BNP BECAUSE YOUR VOTE WILL BE WASTED FOR SURE.
Jeff your exhibiting to us all how immature UKIP followers are, and how futile your arguments are againt the BNP are. 'Dick' Griffin- the most immature notion I have encountered for some time. UKIP is scared of the BNP, because UKIP's membership is in decline and the BNP's is set in due course to overtake them.Originally Posted by Jeff
Well said, Jeff is clearly a person who struggles with facts and reality. UKIP are currently in turmoil, and when the BNP changes our membership policy they will be even more terrified of the BNP and may even lose a number of their members to us. (Maybe senior ones)
To be fair, most of them are not as unutterably crass as "Jeff".
Anybody who thinks that referring to "Dick Griffin" is the height of wit, is clearly in need of help.
The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of the dusk. - G W F Hegel
Most would probably be embarrassed by Jeff.
Jeff is a new breed of UKIP attack dog - trained especially to neutralise the threat that the British National Party poses. They are extremely loyal to their UKIP masters, particularly those who bear more than a passing resemblance to Kermit the Frog, but are very dim in the intelligence department.
MY ADVICE TO READERS IS NOT TO TAKE JEFF SERIOUSLY BECAUSE IF YOU ENTERTAIN SUCH NON-ENTITIES YOUR TIME WILL BE WASTED FOR SURE.
Many normal people in the UK are expressing their support for the BNP. The standard for middle class, educated young people is to be leftist because they get all their **** through the Guardian and its website, but even this is starting to fall flat with many of them.
It's not so much a question of race. People claim that the BNP is racist. But what does 'racism' mean exactly? If it means insulting people with racial or ethnic slurs or refusing to talk to people due to race, ethnicity or religion alone, then yes, I'm fully opposed to that because the moment you do that you become a barbarian and have no right to claim to be civilised. But beyond that, people have the right to stand up for themselves, their country and indeed their own kind. This does not exclude the prospect of being friends with non-white people. That's not the point.
The BNP are the only party espousing true rational, conservative values. Go to virtually any Asian country and you'll find that the BNP policies would make sense to them if applied to their country.
The real reason the BNP aren't getting elected is because rationality has no economic value, and goes against the social, demographic and economic trends prevalent in the West today - and because the mass media is controlled to brainwash people.
The reason most BNP supporters mock UKIP is because UKIP has a reprehensible relationship with a certain left wing extremist organsation.
The middle-class excuse will be 'not racist but things have gone too far'.
It's been said here before, but the misuse of the word 'racism' is sickening. The BBC can make up any stories it likes about 'racist' stupid pictures of Michelle Obama as a monkey, or 'racist' Tintin in the Congo books - these things are irrelevant to the real world.
Did you know that in America, on average one white woman is raped or sexually assaulted by a black man every fifteen minutes? I believe such trends may be escalating in the UK as well, but who's there to report it? The media certainly aren't, as it doesn't fit their agenda.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks