I'm not playing down the possibility of any attacks on anyone.
Everyone is entitled to get on with their lives without any morons of any colour behaving like d1ckheads and screwing things up for them.
What I was doing was demonstrating how one's perspective affects one's perception of reality.
"...the forum's juvenile delinquent" and occasional user of "coarse language"...
No, not the least bit like that; its very difficult to guess a persons age precisely, but in this case it is almost certain the liquid wa snon noxious since the victims suffered NO PHYSICAL EFFECTS unless of course the the shooters had some fiendish plan and had infected the water with Legionnaires disease or similar.It's rather like when the police use the term when they say they're looking for someone 'believed to be in their late 30s'.
They're not dead certain.
Nor have I.I have no doubt it was water, but only when that fluid is analysed in a laboratory can we be 100% as to its identity.
Then I shall point you to a clue, it lies in the description 'naughty'; not that the use of irony demands any particular clues, and I suggets that your failure to see it was another example of your usual bigotted stereotyping of the psters who you mainlyAs for my detective skills, I saw nothing in your post to indicate that you were being ironic - it sounded exactly like your usual irrational and bigoted posts elsewhere on this forum.
disagree with. In other words you assumed I thought that because the boys were black it was more likely that they would be shooting some noxious substance than that it would be water; not at all, my only assumption at the time was that it was water, though with hindsight I realise it may have been something nastier, though probably not dangerous.