Page 5 of 55 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 549

Thread: Bring back Hanging

  1. #41
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,943

    Default

    Bring Back Hanging (A Personal View)

    To put someone in prison costs a thousand pounds a week. The criminals know that bankrupt Britain cannot affort long prison sentences anymore. For sheer economic reasons the criminals know that we cannot afford to give them the proper prison sentences that they truly deserve.

    Britain has to borrow 3 billion pounds a week just to survive. If the prison population continues to rise it will bankrupt Britain at a cost of thousand pound a week per prisoner.

    In this world there are good guys, and bad guys. At the moment the bad guys are winning.
    Last edited by SDP; 16-07-2012 at 08:17 AM.

  2. #42
    Trusted Member Road_Hog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Warwickshire
    Posts
    10,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SDP View Post
    Bring Back Hanging (A Personal View)

    To put someone in prison costs a thousand pounds a week. The criminals know that bankrupt Britain cannot affort long prison sentences anymore. For sheer economic reasons the criminals know that we cannot afford to give them the proper prison sentences that they truly deserve.

    Britain has to borrow 3 billion pounds a week just to survive. If the prison population continues to rise it will bankrupt Britain at a cost of thousand pound a week per prisoner.

    In this world there are good guys, and bad guys. At the moment the bad guys are winning.
    Then it's very simple, lock them up for a long period, and cancel our DFID (foreign aid) budget of £12 billion and don't keep giving the Euro bailout fund £40 billion. Or next time we do quantitative easing, instead of giving it to the banks, spend a bit on the jails.

  3. #43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SDP View Post
    Bring Back Hanging (A Personal View)

    To put someone in prison costs a thousand pounds a week. The criminals know that bankrupt Britain cannot affort long prison sentences anymore. For sheer economic reasons the criminals know that we cannot afford to give them the proper prison sentences that they truly deserve.

    Britain has to borrow 3 billion pounds a week just to survive. If the prison population continues to rise it will bankrupt Britain at a cost of thousand pound a week per prisoner.

    In this world there are good guys, and bad guys. At the moment the bad guys are winning.
    The problem is when 20 years down the line you find out you hung the wrong man.


    Not really possible to dig them up, reanimate them and apologise by then.

    A better plan is to first seize all there assets to offset the cost of there stay, and then when that runs out, make them earn there living in prison.
    Islamic oppression and sexist sharia law should not be allowed free rein in our democratic society.
    King Mike is Dead, long live King Simon of Jerilderia

  4. #44
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Suffolk
    Posts
    1,939

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marilyn View Post
    Can't be done. Once abolished there is no way to reinstate it without looking 3rd world. Plus no-one can be trusted with it anyway. All we have is prison and prison for the worst offences should mean whole life.
    What about the cost of keeping them in prison which must be around £1000 a week? I think the money should be put to better use such as more policeman.I think that without it being brought back we will be become 3rd world.

  5. #45
    Trusted Member Marilyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    24,188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by longjohn View Post
    What about the cost of keeping them in prison which must be around £1000 a week? I think the money should be put to better use such as more policeman.I think that without it being brought back we will be become 3rd world.
    If there was a foolproof method for determining guilt beyond doubt for capital punishment, I would agree. But there isn't.
    However, these cuts in policing and the armed forces numbers defy logic in such dangerous times.

  6. #46
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,943

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Road_Hog View Post
    Then it's very simple, lock them up for a long period, and cancel our DFID (foreign aid) budget of £12 billion and don't keep giving the Euro bailout fund £40 billion. Or next time we do quantitative easing, instead of giving it to the banks, spend a bit on the jails.
    Road Hog

    Locking people up is no good. The repeat offending percentage is terrible. Prison holds no fear for hardened criminals. Now hanging that would scare the **** out of them.

  7. #47
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,943

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marilyn View Post
    If there was a foolproof method for determining guilt beyond doubt for capital punishment, I would agree. But there isn't.
    However, these cuts in policing and the armed forces numbers defy logic in such dangerous times.
    Marilyn

    Yes hanging means that some innocent people will be executed.

    But it also means that many innocent women will not be murdered, raped and tortured to death.

  8. #48
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,943

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by internetcynic View Post
    The problem is when 20 years down the line you find out you hung the wrong man.

    Not really possible to dig them up, reanimate them and apologise by then.

    A better plan is to first seize all there assets to offset the cost of there stay, and then when that runs out, make them earn there living in prison.
    internetcynic

    Remember the woman or child that get murdered or tortured to death by a sex fiend, they are also innocent.

  9. #49
    Trusted Member Marilyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    24,188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SDP View Post
    Marilyn

    Yes hanging means that some innocent people will be executed.

    But it also means that many innocent women will not be murdered, raped and tortured to death.
    It's a dilemma. I still think it is nye on impossible to reinstate it after abolition though.

    But if the UK's crime situation continues to worsen, wherein not even terrorists & other criminals can be deported, then this will become a moot point in time as the people take matters into their own hands.

  10. #50
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,943

    Default

    Innocent people are often killed in this world

    Road Accidents
    Should we ban the motor car because innocent people are killed every day ?

    Disease
    Should we ban all immigration because some immigrants bring in disease that kills innocent people ?

    AIDS
    The killer disease AIDS kills many innocent who have unfaithful partners, but we accept this as OK.

    Nuclear Bombs
    Britain is willing to use the nuclear bomb in self defience, and kill millions of innocent people in the process.

    The War in Iraq
    It has been estimated the over 100,000 civilians have been killed in Iraq but we accept this as necessary.

    World War II
    Total deaths were about 50 million in World War II. About half of these were innocent civilians but this was accepted as necessary.

Page 5 of 55 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •