Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Foreigners to be checked for TB

  1. #1
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,725

    Default Foreigners to be checked for TB

    Foreign travellers from TB-ridden nations will be screened for killer disease before being granted a British visa
    By Sara Malm
    PUBLISHED: 12:02, 22 May 2012 | UPDATED: 13:15, 22 May 2012


    Foreign travellers entering the UK from countries with high incidence of tuberculosis will have to go through a screening for the disease before being granted a visa.

    The new rules were announced by Immigration Minister Damian Green who said the scheme for migrants coming from countries including China, India, Morocco, Nepal, and South Africa, will help save lives and will also save more than £40 million over ten years.
    TB is at its highest level in the UK for more than 30 years, with 9,000 new cases last year alone, up five per cent from 2010.
    Immigrants from high risk countries looking to apply for a visa in the UK will have to be screened for tuberculosis prior to entering the country
    Under the new visa rules, which will be brought in in three stages over 18 months, infectious TB sufferers and those diagnosed with active TB will be denied entry to the UK.
    The pre-entry screening will replace screening at UK airports after a pilot scheme in 15 countries found 300 active cases among 400,000 migrants.

    More...Schoolgirl, 15, dies from TB after Government warns immigration has caused disease to soar
    GP who told girl, 15, she was 'lovesick' failed to diagnose killer TB despite the fact she had same condition a year earlier
    You must treat illegal immigrants or face legal action, GPs are warned

    Mr Green said: 'Tuberculosis is currently at its highest level in the UK for 30 years and it’s essential that we take action to tackle its continued rise.

    ALINA SARAG'S TB BATTLE

    A coroner's inquest into the medical treatment of 15-year-old Alina Sarag who died of TB last year revealed that she could have been saved had doctors only diagnosed her with the killer disease.
    Despite having been treated for TB before none of the five doctors she visited checked her for the disease.

    Alina fell ill after returning from a family holiday in Pakistan in July 2010.

    She was referred to Heartland Hospital on August 26 but was given an all-clear.

    After two more hospital stays she visited Birmingham Children's Hospital in October that year where doctors dismissed her condition as a 'psychological issue'.

    An assessment was carried out but could not be completed as Alina was in too much pain.
    On January 6 Alina had breathing difficulties. Her father called the emergency services but Alina later died of cardiac arrest.
    'Pre-entry screening, followed by treatment where necessary, will help to prevent the risk of TB in the UK and will also save lives.'
    He added: 'Removing screening facilities at airports will save the taxpayer £25 million over ten years and further NHS savings will be made by preventing the importation and spread of TB in the UK.'
    The news comes only days after a review into the care of a Birmingham teen who died from TB last year. 15-year-old Alina Sarag died after doctors dismissed her TB as 'lovesickness’.

    She died from cardiac arrest in January 2011 after visiting her GP and four hospitals. Despite having been treated for tuberculosis in the past her doctor would not test for it.

    Her distraught parents made over 50 phone calls to the family doctor after Alina’s health deteriorated so badly she had to be carried and could only eat baby food.

    The deadly illness kills 1.8 million people worldwide each year.
    Under the scheme, all migrants coming to the UK for more than six months from 67 countries identified as having a high incidence of TB by the World Health Organisation will need to be screened for the airborne infection before being granted a visa. Click here for a full list of countries with high incidence.
    The costs of screening and subsequent treatment will be met by those people applying to come into the UK, the Home Office said.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1vbL8EXgW

  2. #2
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,725

    Default

    What about asylum seekers who pop up?

  3. #3
    Trusted Member Sharon Ebanks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,896

    Default

    Why screen for it now? They've already let it in and it's yet another reason to ban the burka which helps to harbour and spread the disease. War of the worlds...
    I'm about as easy as a nuclear war
    If you think you're free, try going somewhere without f**cking money, okay?


  4. #4
    Trusted Member Road_Hog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Warwickshire
    Posts
    10,670

    Default

    They're going to screen them before they get their visa? Which means, they'll be abroad (probably in their home country), so we will have to have the test done there and trust that it isn't fraudulent.

    "the scheme for migrants coming from countries including China, India, Morocco, Nepal, and South Africa2

    yep, I'm sure we can trust all of those countries to be totally scrupulous about the tests. No, here's a few rupees to give me a pass certificate, no siree.

  5. #5
    Trusted Member Endangered's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    7,148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Road_Hog View Post
    They're going to screen them before they get their visa? Which means, they'll be abroad (probably in their home country), so we will have to have the test done there and trust that it isn't fraudulent.

    "the scheme for migrants coming from countries including China, India, Morocco, Nepal, and South Africa2

    yep, I'm sure we can trust all of those countries to be totally scrupulous about the tests. No, here's a few rupees to give me a pass certificate, no siree.
    I think they are probably screening them for TB. Those without the disease are the ones that will be turned away.

    It's to 'save' the NHS. More customers and all that.
    "Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities" ~ Voltaire


  6. #6
    Trusted Member Seymour Stilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    On the edge.
    Posts
    3,668

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharon Ebanks View Post
    Why screen for it now? They've already let it in....
    I agree. Why now?

    As for this governments sincerity. From the OP:

    You must treat illegal immigrants or face legal action, GPs are warned
    If a government was serious, shouldn't that be 'GP's must hand over illegal immigrants to the police for instant deportation'?

    All mainstream parties are the same: Highly deceitful and dangerous.

    How about the tens of thousands of Africans being treated at the British tax payers expense, and very expensive it is too, for HIV? If Green is serious, why not do something about them?

  7. #7
    Trusted Member Sharon Ebanks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Seymour Stilch View Post
    I agree. Why now?

    As for this governments sincerity. From the OP:



    If a government was serious, shouldn't that be 'GP's must hand over illegal immigrants to the police for instant deportation'?

    All mainstream parties are the same: Highly deceitful and dangerous.

    How about the tens of thousands of Africans being treated at the British tax payers expense, and very expensive it is too, for HIV? If Green is serious, why not do something about them?
    Its known as handling problems with sensitivity, but I see no reason why AIDS treatment cannot be given to a person in their country of origin, eh? Perhaps a word in the shell-like of the computer and mobile phone manufacturers could do it. You know, we take your minerals for next to nothing for our technology and in exchange we'll build you a hospital...
    I'm about as easy as a nuclear war
    If you think you're free, try going somewhere without f**cking money, okay?


  8. #8
    Trusted Member Seymour Stilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    On the edge.
    Posts
    3,668

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharon Ebanks View Post
    Its known as handling problems with sensitivity, but I see no reason why AIDS treatment cannot be given to a person in their country of origin, eh? Perhaps a word in the shell-like of the computer and mobile phone manufacturers could do it. You know, we take your minerals for next to nothing for our technology and in exchange we'll build you a hospital...
    But they are not our problem, so no sensitivity required. From memory it costs something like £15 grand per year to treat these people, I also expect we have to support most of them on welfare too.

    Personally, I think what Africans do or catch is none of our business.

    But as long as you are not suggesting the British tax payer picks up the tab for this treatment in Africa, and it looks like you're not, I don't care who chucks money at it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •