Liddle said that the Steven Lawrence trial could never be fair:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/spectator-magazine-charged-over-rod-liddle-article-on-stephen-lawrence-trial-7728550.html
Liddle said that the Steven Lawrence trial could never be fair:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/spectator-magazine-charged-over-rod-liddle-article-on-stephen-lawrence-trial-7728550.html
Rod Liddle was trying to promote Rod Liddle.
It's one of his favourite pastimes.
I think Rob Liddle was stating what was fairly obvious, but when the obvious is that there has been too much publicity for those accused of Lawrence's murder to realistically get a fair trial now, he does come off as a bit of a 'clever dick', by waving the issue in the court's face.
Well they should have got the trial right first time and not changed 800 years of British law. What happened to the right of freedom of speech, the Spectator gave an opinion not like it had hacked the prosecutions phones.
Would the C.O.C. issue have been considered if the article had been about what a set of racist pigs the suspects were.
Stephen Lawrence obviously did not stab himself, but who did stab him, will we ever get the real truth or will we get a political verdict that suits, I just don't know.
What IS known however, the two Men who now reside in prison for this murder, still have not been shown to have stabed Lawence. How can two People inflict one wound?
The CPS were not interested in who did do it, just who may have done it.
But who cares?
They are White skum, not Imigrunt skum.
Bookmarks