I don't mean this unkindly but that comment seems to sum up your approach to the discussion.
You assert opinions or a stance that the electorate takes.
You state what the public opinion is on various matters.
You assert the limited capabilities of members of this forum.
All without a shred of supporting evidence.
Stated as opinion is fine.
Stated as fact, maybe not so fine.
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
For a more intelligent perspective: www.rt.com
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION WANTS TO BAN ALL SEEDS AND PLANTS THAT AREN'T AUTHORISED BY THEM, AND CRIMINALISE THEIR USE!
I do have lots of evidence. The evidence gleaned from being an avid media watcher, reading the many opinions expressed in the news media about public hostility to MPs, listening to interviews of members of the public on TV etc etc. I'm just not prepared to trawl through and find the links to the evidence.
I'd put back a scenario to you:
Given that the average salary package of a FTSE chief exec is over £3 million a year, what do you think the public reaction would be if David Cameron announced tomorrow that, as from the next general election, the new PM (of whatever party) would have a salary of say £500,000 a year instead of £140,000 a year at present?
He further announces that all other MPs' salaries will be increased accordingly. And that this is all in recognition of the fact that MPs have been underpaid for too long.
Do you believe the public would, on balance, be supportive to the idea or not?
Well thanks for the kind comments.
On Cameron, I'm not really defending him. As with so much in politics, I regard him as the least worst option.
The UK is in a deep hole at the moment and whoever is in power would struggle. I doubt very much if a single person on this forum could do as well as Cameron in managing the various competing interests.
The problem I have with Cameron is on policy not on his managerial skills (which are considerable). On policy however, like the previous PMs we have had for over 40 years, I believe he is taking us in the wrong direction.
My view of an ideal person to be PM is long dead - Enoch Powell - a brilliant mind and prepared to say and do what he thinks is right, regardless of the consequences.
Not.
Defending the indefensible.
There are better options available than him, sitting behind him on his own backbenches.As with so much in politics, I regard him as the least worst option.
Which DC/LOL is making deeper.The UK is in a deep hole at the moment
It would help if, as you correctly state in your next point, his policies weren't taking us in the wrong direction.and whoever is in power would struggle.
Wouldn't it be preferable to have a PM whose policies would take us in the right direction, instead of what we have at present, which is David Cameron taking us in the wrong direction?I doubt very much if a single person on this forum could do as well as Cameron in managing the various competing interests.
The problem I have with Cameron is on policy not on his managerial skills (which are considerable). On policy however, like the previous PMs we have had for over 40 years, I believe he is taking us in the wrong direction.
For a more intelligent perspective: www.rt.com
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION WANTS TO BAN ALL SEEDS AND PLANTS THAT AREN'T AUTHORISED BY THEM, AND CRIMINALISE THEIR USE!
For a more intelligent perspective: www.rt.com
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION WANTS TO BAN ALL SEEDS AND PLANTS THAT AREN'T AUTHORISED BY THEM, AND CRIMINALISE THEIR USE!
Bookmarks