Caught out?

[Nickerlarse]

Note Gillam, that you didn't get an answer again.

The claim was made only by Hope Not Hate/Pete Walker and others rushed to believe it.

Perhaps you could ask Gillam to give us the real facts, backed up by proof Shaun? That should stop any lies and innuendo in its tracks, don't you think?

[Shaun]

Perhaps you could ask Gillam to give us the real facts, backed up by proof Shaun? That should stop any lies and innuendo in its tracks, don't you think?

The claim about the legacy was made only by Hope Not Hate/Pete Walker and others rushed to believe it.

[Nickerlarse]

The claim about the legacy was made only by Hope Not Hate/Pete Walker and others rushed to believe it.

The counter-claim was made by Gillam, and you rushed to defend it. Our beloved permanent leader has now confirmed that it was indeed a £500,000 legacy. Why not go the whole hog, if you will excuse the expression, and tell the whole truth for once? That would silence the pesky reds!!!

[Sheepy]

The counter-claim was made by Gillam, and you rushed to defend it. Our beloved permanent leader has now confirmed that it was indeed a £500,000 legacy. Why not go the whole hog, if you will excuse the expression, and tell the whole truth for once? That would silence the pesky reds!!!

£500,000 worth of belief Nickerlarse name one other Nationalist party that can raise that much belief then.

[Papa Luigi]

£500,000 worth of belief Nickerlarse name one other Nationalist party that can raise that much belief then.

Might I point out that UKIP raise that sort of money in donations?

[Sheepy]

Might I point out that UKIP raise that sort of money in donations?

You may indeed but do you consider them a Nationalist party Papa? Obviously before you say you might not consider the BNP a Nationalist party those who make up it numbers are still British Nationalists.

[Gillam]

What about the fact that a General Members' Meeting (GMM) should not have been called in the middle of a leadership challenge? Richard Edmonds' challenge was already under way, but as soon as Griffin heard that Richard was standing down in favour of Andrew Brons he called a GMM, in order to change the rules in his favour yet again, by creating a four year term of office and moving the date of the election forward from the autumn to the end of July.

The whole thing stinks and you know it.

The motions from the conference had to ratified. If it's any help, many of those at the meeting, including myself, voted against, but it was those proxy (ie: postal) that turned the votes. Plus quite a few present who voted in favour.
In the LE itself, I voted for Andrew, and would have voted for Richard. I know without any doubt that the election itself was well run and perfectly above board. Ask Andrew and Richard, they were there too.

[Gillam]

This is what I said:

We haven't been left the whole estate, how silly are some people! it has to go through probate in any case before the distribution to inheritors can take place. Oh, and I know exactly which account the money will eventually be deposited in, so you can all forget "back pockets"!

£500,000 is an estimate of the amount from 3 legacies. The largest is estimated to be about £380,000. This is the one I was referring to.Nick was quoting what Searchlight had alleged.

Are you now going to explain why you side with Searchlight and HnH, and why you cut Nick's tweet?

[Nickerlarse]

This is what I said:

£500,000 is an estimate of the amount from 3 legacies. The largest is estimated to be about £380,000. This is the one I was referring to.Nick was quoting what Searchlight had alleged.

Are you now going to explain why you side with Searchlight and HnH, and why you cut Nick's tweet?

"This is what I said:

£500,000 is an estimate of the amount from 3 legacies. The largest is estimated to be about £380,000."

Where and when did you say that? I have only seen Griffin's reference to the allegation in his Tweet. He didn't make it clear that the £500.000 was the sum of three seperate legacies. Where was Nick quoting from? I still haven't seen the Searchlight allegation to which he refers.

"Are you now going to explain why you side with Searchlight and HnH?"

I do not recall ever saying that I 'side with Searchlight and HnH'. What else do you base this bizarre accusation on?

"......and why you cut Nick's tweet?"

I explained this in two earlier posts, please scroll up to #56 & #58.

[Gillam]

"This is what I said:

£500,000 is an estimate of the amount from 3 legacies. The largest is estimated to be about £380,000."

Where and when did you say that? I have only seen Griffin's reference to the allegation in his Tweet. He didn't make it clear that the £500.000 was the sum of three seperate legacies. Where was Nick quoting from? I still haven't seen the Searchlight allegation to which he refers.

"Are you now going to explain why you side with Searchlight and HnH?"

I do not recall ever saying that I 'side with Searchlight and HnH'. What else do you base this bizarre accusation on?

"......and why you cut Nick's tweet?"

I explained this in two earlier posts, please scroll up to #56 & #58.

Try reading my post again, this time noting the quote, which you left out for some reason.

The rest is hedging on your part.