Caught out?

[Gillam]

If, as has been claimed, this legacy has been left exclusively to the BNP's own "Lennie Small", Clive Jefferson--ne Aitken, one has to presume that this has been done to try and dupe and circumvent the legitimate claims and court rulings against the BNP, Griffin and Darby.

I am sure the BNP's many creditors and people like "The Decembrists" will be watching this development keenly.

Where has anything of the sort been claimed?

[Nickerlarse]

Where has anything of the sort been claimed?

Where has all the money gone?

[Nickerlarse]

No, the proxy votes were not bogus. I didn't like that they were to be sent to various people as it was obvious that Nick, being best known, would garner the most. So I'll give you that one, but 'bogus' is a misnomer.
The LE was not corrupt, it was well run. There were complaints on both sides and these were addressed.

I do not need you to pronounce on my credibility. Someone who would rather denounce a Nationalist for writing the truth of the matter tnan question a known anti-national site's ramblings? No way.

I would not be arrogant enough to pronounce on anyone's lack of credibility Gillam. In your case it is self evident. It saddens me to have witnessed your shameful betrayal of your former colleagues' trust.

[Nickerlarse]

We haven't been left the whole estate, how silly are some people!

It would appear that you was mistaken Gillam! Contrary to your earlier statement, Gri££in has just confirmed that the legacy was for £500,000. Has our beloved permanent leader been telling you porkies too?

Gri££in on Twitter today: "......our £5OO,OOO legacy money came from IRA!"

He claimed to be responding to an assertion by a third party. Typically Gri££in failed to provide a link to the original assertion.

[Gillam]

It would appear that you was mistaken Gillam! Contrary to your earlier statement, Gri££in has just confirmed that the legacy was for £500,000. Has our beloved permanent leader been telling you porkies too?

Gri££in on Twitter today: "......our £5OO,OOO legacy money came from IRA!"

He claimed to be responding to an assertion by a third party. Typically Gri££in failed to provide a link to the original assertion.

And why did you not quote the whole Tweet?
"Latest lie from Searchlight touts is that our £500,000 legacy money came from IRA! Crazy cranks ..."

[Nickerlarse]

And why did you not quote the whole Tweet?
"Latest lie from Searchlight touts is that our £500,000 legacy money came from IRA! Crazy cranks ..."

I quoted the relevant bit Gillam.
Are you prepared to come clean about the legacy yet?

[Gillam]

No, you quoted part of it, to make it look bad.
What do you want me to "come clean" about?

[Nickerlarse]

No, you quoted part of it, to make it look bad.
What do you want me to "come clean" about?

I made it quite clear that it was a partial quote. That is what this '............' means. I also included a reference to the source, for those that wished to view the whole Tweet. What do you believe that I was making look bad? What do you suggest that I should have done to make it look less bad?

Do you have a link or a reference to the third party assertion that our beloved permanent leader is refuting in his Tweet?

Do you think that Gri££in is deliberately trying to 'make it look bad'?

It would be nice to hear the whole truth, i.e. 'come clean', about the legacy that our beloved permanent leader refers to in his Tweet. Was it indeed around £500,000, as our beloved permanent leader now admits? When you earlier denied that it was £500,000 was you mistaken or simply being economical with the truth?

[Simon de Montfort]

No, the proxy votes were not bogus. I didn't like that they were to be sent to various people as it was obvious that Nick, being best known, would garner the most. So I'll give you that one, but 'bogus' is a misnomer.
The LE was not corrupt, it was well run. There were complaints on both sides and these were addressed.

What about the fact that a General Members' Meeting (GMM) should not have been called in the middle of a leadership challenge? Richard Edmonds' challenge was already under way, but as soon as Griffin heard that Richard was standing down in favour of Andrew Brons he called a GMM, in order to change the rules in his favour yet again, by creating a four year term of office and moving the date of the election forward from the autumn to the end of July.

The whole thing stinks and you know it.

[Shaun]

Where has anything of the sort been claimed?

Note Gillam, that you didn't get an answer again.

The claim was made only by Hope Not Hate/Pete Walker and others rushed to believe it.

I'm glad you also noticed that Nickerlarse left Searchlight out of the other quote.