Yes Road Hog .. Agreed. Perhaps our politicians should look to Australia for direction and public outrage and response to lies.
To decimate a political party that will probably never see power again may ram it home to those here that support lies and fraud.. Gleick is a hero according to some of the warmists. Gleick is a confessed liar, thief and a criminal and should go to prison. If this is the type of hero the warmists look up to then they need serious help.
Temperatures may go down as well as up terms and conditions apply.
Climate change does indeed exist. It's always existed; the climate has always changed. As the Earth warms up the ice melts, as the ice melts the oceans cool, as the oceans cool the climate cools, as the climate cools ice forms, the oceans left warm up, as the oceans warm up the climate warms up, as the climate warms up the ice melts, as the ice melts the oceans cool and round-and-round-and-round we go.Originally Posted by Besoeker
So yes, I do believe in climate change. Do I believe in the mass hysteria that we are the causes therefore should pay huge amounts of tax and that it should be used to enslave us even further under the jack-boots of multi-national corporations? No, I certainly do not.
Animal Rights. Human Rights. Freedom.
Lawful Rebellion
So I should believe the opinions posted here from those with no background in science as being more authorative than those of a senior scientist?
Is that your message?
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Exactly what mass hysteria?
Front page headline news in the press?
Lead stories in television or radio news bulletins?
Masses of people taking to the streets?
A hot topic in the pubs?
Discussed with neighbours over the garden fence?
To be blunt, my observation is most of the general public are pretty much indifferent about the issue.
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
So what is wrong with excepting the opinion of all the senior scientists that don't think global warming is going to be a problem?
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand. They listen with the intent to reply.” Stephen Covey
Senior scientists lie, they've been caught out lying many times. Should believe someone just because they are a scientist?
That is my message.
Nothing wrong with excepting it.
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
People in all walks of life lie and cheat.
Can you demonstrate, with robust supporting evidence, the lies, if there are any, in the article I cited?
Last edited by Besoeker; 26-03-2012 at 06:11 PM. Reason: Cited, not posted.
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
I never said that there were any lies in your article, don't twist my words.
What I did say is,
Which part of that do you not understand?
BS, can You stop editing My posts please. I have asked You too many times before.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks