British Nationalism ruined

[newinn14]

In fact I think it may be time for a new avatar...

[Man of the Lake]

Look at Danny Lake steaming in, demanding a title, then leaving.

I'm not making any judgments on your observations of the nationalist cause, and I would like to say that you're entitled to an opinion. But can I just say that I didn't at any point, demand anything. I merely contacted Peter Mullins to find out more, and was bombarded with requests to take up this position and that position. Trust me, mate. All I did was show interest in what did, at first sight, look promising.

Anyway, have fun discussing the crazy world that is nationalist party politics. Personally, I'm glad to be rid of it all. It's just so negative, and if you don't mind my saying, you would do well to take some time away from it all. Seriously, take a step back, look at the bigger picture and ask yourself if what you're doing has ever and will ever make yours or for that matter, anybody elses life better. The answer to which is no, it won't and it hasn't.

Ideas are what changes the world. Positive action, love, respect and tolerance. Reactionary politics, trying to make yourself right and others wrong, striving to get more votes than the next guy. None of this is going to improve anything, and [take it from somebody who knows] will only make you enemies.

So if you want to change something, do some good, make a positive impact on the world, or simply make a contribution to something. Why not do something else? Invent something, think of a new idea, go on a spiritual journey, put more energy into your family, your hobbies, or whatever it is that makes you feel you're having an impact. Do some charity work, go travelling, speak to people, share your ideas, get involved with some local social, community or environmental campaigns, and do so without these negative party political tags you attach to yourselfs.

Namaste, Brothers and Sisters :-)

DL

[longjohn]

Unless nationalist get together away from the mad houses we will make no headway. I think all of these little people now running the various shows are mostly "round the bend" and unless activist’s move away from them they we will get nowhere. Neither will anyone in this forum make any headway as 1. There are not enough REAL activists who use it. 2. Most people just “talk the talk” but won’t “walk the walk”.

[Simon de Montfort]

Unless nationalist get together away from the mad houses we will make no headway. I think all of these little people now running the various shows are mostly "round the bend" and unless activist’s move away from them they we will get nowhere. Neither will anyone in this forum make any headway as 1. There are not enough REAL activists who use it. 2. Most people just “talk the talk” but won’t “walk the walk”.

I think things should look clearer after the elections.

[longjohn]

I think things should look clearer after the elections.

I hope so.

[Man of the Lake]

Unless nationalist get together away from the mad houses we will make no headway.

It's interesting you should say this, because I've just spent the past month working with various political and spiritual communities. Thing is, it's got me thinking about the whole idea of disengagement. Breaking away and forming our own communities. There has been a lot of talk in the past about similar things, and the issues always seem to be over cost. But even this doesn't need to be an issue if such communities were willing to work together as a functioning, alternative community, whilst enforcing their natural right to occupy a space of land.

DL

[Brit-Nat]

Forming nations within nations is a surrender (Pioneer little Europe and the rest) - The Americans have a good reason to pursue that course (cheap land, no claim on indigenous rights) but we're talking about our f***ing homeland!

As an aside, it's interesting that newinn attacks Danny Lake. Another attack on a young nationalist, anybody would think that the old cowardly man resents youthful intellect that far outstrips his own pathetic offerings. Perhaps it's his inferiority complex - which is justified, I might add.

[Man of the Lake]

Forming nations within nations is a surrender (Pioneer little Europe and the rest) - The Americans have a good reason to pursue that course (cheap land, no claim on indigenous rights) but we're talking about our f***ing homeland!

I see your point. But I can't help but feel that it's a case of presenting people with a tangible alternative. Quite often the tendency is for us to stand there and scream for the politicians to change things, when in doing so, all we are doing is recognising their authority over our life's.

If we want change, we have to do more than tell people what is wrong. We need to do more than ask men who have no interest in listening, if they can be so kind as to consider us, the people, in a nation they're intent on destroying. As I see it, the only answer can be disengagement.

DL

[longjohn]

It's interesting you should say this, because I've just spent the past month working with various political and spiritual communities. Thing is, it's got me thinking about the whole idea of disengagement. Breaking away and forming our own communities. There has been a lot of talk in the past about similar things, and the issues always seem to be over cost. But even this doesn't need to be an issue if such communities were willing to work together as a functioning, alternative community, whilst enforcing their natural right to occupy a space of land.

DL

I did an article about this some time ago. Must try and dig it out. It meant that Nationalists who could, would move to different parts of the Country starting with some obscure Village and takeing it over. Is that the sort of thing you are thinking about.

[Man of the Lake]

I did an article about this some time ago. Must try and dig it out. It meant that Nationalists who could, would move to different parts of the Country starting with some obscure Village and takeing it over. Is that the sort of thing you are thinking about.

Not quite. I'm talking total economic, political aand social disengagement. So something more along the lines of starting our own community from the roots up. Of course, I'm talking total disengagement. So we don't pay for the land, we occupy it and adhere to no law but common law and our traditional way of life. If the system tries to move us on, it tries to move us on. But by enforcing our natural right to occupy land, we can draw it out and at the same time, work on building a fully functioning, alternative community. All we would need are the right people with the right skills, and we would be able to provide for most if not all of our daily needs between us.

DL