Should UKIP bring back Section 28?

Mikeuk · 06-02-2007, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phagocyte

Then I believe you'll have to find a little thing I like to call proof before I begin thinking about whether to report you for harassment.

Who to?

Tony? The Police? Santa Claus? :shock: 8)

:P :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink:

As they say, if you can't stand the heat... :twisted:

Mikeuk · 06-02-2007, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phagocyte

I submit that morality is subjective (and therefore essentially unhelpful) in this case.

If that's so then my morality, which I would characterise as Conservative, Traditionalist and Christianity-based - although you don't need to believe in God to subscribe to it - is as good as yours or anybody else's.

Phagocyte · 06-02-2007, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phagocyte

I submit that morality is subjective (and therefore essentially unhelpful) in this case.

If that's so then my morality, which I would characterise as Conservative, Traditionalist and Christianity-based - although you don't need to believe in God to subscribe to it - is as good as yours or anybody else's.

Absolutely.
But it's also inapplicable to everyone else.

Feldoon · 06-02-2007, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phagocyte

I submit that morality is subjective (and therefore essentially unhelpful) in this case.

If that's so then my morality, which I would characterise as Conservative, Traditionalist and Christianity-based - although you don't need to believe in God to subscribe to it - is as good as yours or anybody else's.

In a contested view, I back up Phagocyte's post.

My morals are roughly Satanic.

Thus proving Phagocyte's point. I give him permission to quote this post as proof.

Mikeuk · 06-02-2007, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phagocyte

Now either provide a rutting reason beyond "Phagocyte agreed with Feldoon" or don't bring this up again.

What's a 'rutting reason' other than an excuse for a gay orgy?

Come to think of it, maybe you meant 'rutting season' :twisted:

Phagocyte · 06-02-2007, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phagocyte

Now either provide a rutting reason beyond "Phagocyte agreed with Feldoon" or don't bring this up again.

What's a 'rutting reason' other than an excuse for a gay orgy?

Come to think of it, maybe you meant 'rutting season' :twisted:

Perhaps I was not abundantly clear.

I would like a godd*mned, motherf*cking, p*sscutting reason why you've decided, due to whatever complexes you may have, to lump me together with Feldoon without so much as one iota of proof.

Explain why we must be one and the same or drop it.

mkpdavies · 06-02-2007, 01:56 PM

I'm locking this thread. It adds nothing to the one already open in SO.

View Poll Results: Should UKIP bring back Section 28?
Yes	27	60.00%
No	18	40.00%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

06-02-2007, 01:56 PM	#97 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,615	I'm locking this thread. It adds nothing to the one already open in SO. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode