Lib Dem councillor supports British National Party campaign
At the end of the article, British National Party Leader and MEP Nicholas John Griffin said at a "Bring Our Troops Home" campaign stall,
“We have had all sorts of people, including a Liberal Democrat councillor who said ‘obviously I don’t agree with you on a lot of policies, but I agree with you on this’.”
BNP leader in region for troops petition (From The Northern Echo)
Which is one reason why the LIbDems and the BNP are unelectable as far as I am concerned, and why the Tories and Labour are electable.
There are major strategic problems with this 'Fortress Britain' attitude, that's why the Tories and Labour have, very sensibly, rejected it.
So one unidentified councillor agreeing with the BNP and so now we're all tarred with the same brush? What utter nonsense. It wouldn't take me long to identify Labour and Tory politicians who make the rest of their party cringe. You had George Galloway when he was a member of the Labour party shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, oh yes and you had Maggy Thatcher calling for her best friend Augusto Pinochet to be let free (because having your leftist opponents killed isn't really a crime apparently), you have Ken Livingstone becoming best chums with Hugo Chavez, not to mention the reactionary friends the Tory party has aligned itself to in the European parliament...
So if you want to talk about electability and throw stones I think you'd better make sure you're not standing in a big glass house...
No it isn't.Originally Posted by bornfree
The LibLabCon parties are collectively GUILTY of deceit, lies and outright FRAUD. If I steal a few thousand pounds from my neighbour, would this neighbour be sensible to utilize my services repeatedly, even though the aforementioned neighbour knew full well what I was up to? How about if I promised the neighbour that I would pay it back into his account in a few years time, at my own discretion?
The LibLabCon is also collectively guilty of genocide in Serbia, Iraq and Afghanistan. They are guilty of ignoring genocides that were 'less' important- i.e. less financially viable (Darfur, Rwanda).
I don't like the present BNP, but if the BNP is the only alernative to a fraudulent genocidal elite, I'd sooner vote for them.
'Orrible nasty farchisst
Perhaps you would care to share your wisdom with us, oh great enlightened one.
Actually, 'Fortress Britain' would be a very sensible policy, though I agree it would depend on how it was interpreted. No-one, however, as far as I know - and certainly no-one in the BNP - has suggested that Britain completely opts out of all foreign engagements. The BNP's position - which I support - is simply that we only take part in foreign conflicts where there is a strategic national interest at stake.
As far as Iraq was concerned, there was no UK interest at all in deposing Sadam Hussein, and as for Afghanistan, we have no argument with the Taliban, only with al Qaida - and we could easily keep them out of Afghanistan without risking any British lives.
No, actually the reason they are so keen on sending young British lads to die and have their arms and legs blown off in Afghanistan is because they are the poodles of the US.
I ignore trolls: Wowbanger; Silfur, DeeDee; Charlemagne; Jeff; Petewalker; Minime; Petrosal; Baghera; Cally; Rebecca ...
Very good point Zeitgeist. Stones and glass houses indeed.
Now that the LibDems are getting into real government they will morph into something different and their upper echelons suddenly start to see the wisdom of foreign wars for oil or (TAPI) pipeline contracts. Trad LibDems will be marginalised along with the BNP and other 'cranks'. This councillor wasn't saying anything other than repeating his long-held views on the foreign occupations. It'll be spun to his disadvantage though and it just goes to show what my old dad always said - 'whoever you vote for, the government always gets in'
...or if Elections meant real change they'd be banned...
Fortress Britain attitude? Not wanting our brave boys and girls killed on foreign soil in regime change wars that are for oil and the associated contracts, after the "dictators - normally funded by us and the US at some stage" have stopped towing the line! The mind boggles!
YouTube - MAGNA CARTA APPEAL
This is really a media farce.Because you agree with Hitler that egg sandwiches are nice, it doesn't make his atrocities any the less unpalatable to you !
I disagree with the wars.I think they are wars of greed and think Bliar and Bush should face a war crimes trial for using a UN resolution "loosely" for their own agenda and "fabricating evidence" which led to the death of many innocent civilians and many brave soldiers.The BNP think the same. So what? I loathe the BNP and what they stand for.Their leader,a former Holocaust denier who had a change of heart for votes and votes alone (he's never given a reason),is in my own humble opinion a fraud,a racist (until recently running a whites only party) and someone who it beggars belief could actually "lead" a party. BUT we agree on one thing! I think all this story shows is that the mainstream media has its own political agenda, again fuelled by greed and the backing of big business in return for slanting the news.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks