British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Political Parties > Liberal Democrat General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-12-2007, 05:45 PM   #11 (permalink)
rjt
Uber Member
 
rjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 5,155
rjt is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
Of course it is their right - I never said it wasn't. People have the right to do whatever they want so long as they do not harm others, that doesn't mean every single consensual act is rational. I think it is irrational to vote for or against someone because of their religious beliefs.
It is no diffrent to voting for a libertarian because you beleive in what they stand for I certainly do not regard that as irrational. It is supporting someone who believes in similar things that you do.
__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.
rjt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 19-12-2007, 05:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,037
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjt View Post
It is no diffrent to voting for a libertarian because you beleive in what they stand for I certainly do not regard that as irrational. It is supporting someone who believes in similar things that you do.
No, there is a vast difference. The libertarian will enact libertarian policies. They will not enact Christian or atheist policies (if there is such a thing as an atheist policy). I would not vote for Mike Huckabee, not because he is a Christian, but because he wants to enact Christian policies into what should be a secular state which separates church and state in its own constitution.

I would sooner vote for atheist John Stuart Mill than Catholic Hitler.
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2007, 05:50 PM   #13 (permalink)
rjt
Uber Member
 
rjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 5,155
rjt is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
No, there is a vast difference. The libertarian will enact libertarian policies. They will not enact Christian or atheist policies (if there is such a thing as an atheist policy). I would not vote for Mike Huckabee, not because he is a Christian, but because he wants to enact Christian policies into what should be a secular state which separates church and state in its own constitution.

I would sooner vote for atheist John Stuart Mill than Catholic Hitler.
So because you do not beleive in this mans policys you would not vote for him, but perhaps a christian would the question is why is that irrational? perhaps a christian might think a country would be better if it was chrisitan and not secualr, is that irrational?
__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.
rjt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2007, 05:54 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,615
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Huckleberry isn't a true Christian. He has killed 10 people, believes in premptive war and has no problems with stealing from people.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2007, 06:05 PM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default "Clegg does not believe in God" (claim), UK, party

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjt View Post
BBC NEWS | Politics | Clegg 'does not believe in God'

Hardly supprising really Lib Dems dont beleive in anything!
"Clegg does not believe in God" it is claimed above.

Well, one thing is clear - he doesnt' believe in the UK either. And neither does his party.

Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2007, 06:06 PM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Rather him than me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
No doubt.....Polly Toynbee is his best friend.
Rather him than me.

Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2007, 06:07 PM   #17 (permalink)
rjt
Uber Member
 
rjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 5,155
rjt is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britannist View Post
"Clegg does not believe in God" it is claimed above.

Well, one thing is clear - he doesnt' believe in the UK either. And neither does his party.

Yes Indeed, another ghastly europhile who must be overcome.
__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.
rjt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2007, 06:13 PM   #18 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Liberal 'Democrats', policies, Pound, defence expenditure, UK, EU Superstate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
I don't happen to agree with Lib Dem policies either.
And the majority of people who vote for the Liberal 'Democrats' wouldn't either if they knew what their policies were (i.e. destroying our ancient Pound; reducing defence expenditure, forcing the UK into an EU Superstate, raising tax, increasing immigration etc.).

Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2007, 06:18 PM   #19 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Europhile Cllegg, anti-Iraq 'war' protest vote, election, opinion polls, Labour

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjt View Post
......another ghastly europhile who must be overcome.
In my view, the europhile Clegg - despite all his 'hot air' now - is not going to be able to stop the anti-Iraq 'war' protest vote the Liberal Dims got last time returning to the Labour fold at the next General Election. He may enjoy a 'political honeymoon' since he is new (as leader of his party) - increased support for his party in the opinion polls - but it will be a temporary rise in projected support in the polls which will reduce as Labour get back the votes it lost to the Liberal Dims at the May 2005 General Election.

Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2007, 06:18 PM   #20 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,037
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjt View Post
So because you do not beleive in this mans policys you would not vote for him, but perhaps a christian would the question is why is that irrational? perhaps a christian might think a country would be better if it was chrisitan and not secualr, is that irrational?
No, because in order to create a Christian state one must make Christian policies, that was my point. In order to create a libertarian, socialist, conservative or nationalist state the religion of the representatives is irrelevant (unless they decide that it is not by trying to promote religious legislation).
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and FuzzFizz
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0