![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London.
Posts: 2,710
![]() |
I don't have a lot of time generally for the EU-loving, neo-socialist LibDems, but I have to say that the following is encourging and deserves UKIP backing:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6129566.stm Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
Yep, that will win them a lot of votes.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
The most sensible (only sensible?) thing the Lib-Dems have said.
UKIP could go one better and pledge a similar Bill repealing far more than their pitiful 10 Acts. I would say the idea is a simple one to sell, encompasses our libertarian agenda and could be quite effective. One for our policy working groups to formulate perhaps |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Solihull, in The Forest of Arden, Warwickshire!
Posts: 2,631
Party: None
![]() |
I wonder why so many libertarians are in UKIP or support it and the media like to suppose that the opposite is the case? :?
__________________
www.westminster-whispers.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
On a different note i found this brilliant description of Cameron by a student. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,601
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
![]() |
I don't believe that the opportunistic europhile Liberal Dims mean much (if anything) of what they say above (in their latest policy statement).
First of all, the Liberal Dims are not going to be the next Government (or probably even a tiny part of it). They are going to lose alot of seats next time (50 of their 62 constituencies in the Commons are highly marginal) as the anti-Iraq 'war' protest vote returns (mostly) to Labour (which will have a new leader by then). The question is - why has UKIP let these vile Liberal Dims give the impression that they (the Liberal Dims) and not UKIP were there first in their opposition to the authoritarian, costly and unwanted ID card scheme of the discredited control freak Blair? UKIP was against the whole concept of ID cards and the intrusive ID card database long before Campbell's Fiberal Dims and the Conservatives were. UKIP should not let the fanatically pro-EU Liberal Dims dominate ID card opposition. Especially as ID cards are the first step to the plan for an EU ID card. And the Liberal Dims adore the EU. UKIP should be saying that the Fiberal Dims can't have it both ways. They can't be against ID cards and for the EU at the same time. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and FuzzFizz
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]