+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: A return to Old Labour?

  1. #31
    Trusted Member Red Rackham has some supporters Red Rackham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Staffordshire England.
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adlib View Post
    If Labour get absolutely slaughtered in the General Election, do you think a new leader would see the party ditch New Labour and return to socialism?

    Perhaps many traditional Labour supporters WANT New Labour to fail, so the Labour party of old can return, the one that cared about workers and more patriotic.

    Balanced opinions please, this is a neutral thread, no bashing one way or the other.
    Tbh I think old Labour or a socialist Labour party is a thing of the past regardless of the results of the election. Across Europe socialist governments are taking a battering due to their pro globalisation and Immigration policies, socialism is definately out of fashion. Which leaves us [the electorate] with a bit of a dilema, do we vote for the blue Tories, or the red Tories?

    Persoanaly I would spoil my ballot paper before voting Labour again (and I say this as an ex lifelong Labour voter) and imo Cameron just hasn't got "it" the Tories seem rudderless. After the past decade the Tories should be at least twenty points ahead but the gap is nothing, I see a hung parliament and for that I blame all politicians. Having said that a coalition governent may not be such a bad thing.
    It is not racist to be concerned about immigration.

  2. #32
    Trusted Member Red Rackham has some supporters Red Rackham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Staffordshire England.
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paralreg View Post
    We in this country profess to know of Socialism and either dam it to hell or morn wistfully over its assumed demise. Socialism has been proffered as a cure all, to the ills of the world. But in itself it is not and can never be because there has to be balance and this is the weakness of Communism and old type Socialism, they are for themselves as Capitalism is today.
    The way forward is division through unity, the concept that Socialists and Capitalists cannot exist alone, for as Capitalism will consume itself, Socialism will do the same each destroying themselves.
    Capitalism needs people, Socialism needs money, only in unity can society develop and indeed become Socialist that is a society based on social well being. Capitalism services this Society and as it makes money it pays wages and taxes and will hopefully bring outside wealth in through the invisible sector. Generating re growth throughout society for all to share.
    No Government since the post war Labour government, has considered the condition of the people in the slightest. There is no Social responsibility in Labour they are probably further right than many Conservatives.
    Labour today is an abomination and a traitor to the working class from the bottom to the top it has lied and deceived us all as it destroyed this country, My country I feel I speak for many when I say "Just Go" we don't even care enough about you, to hate you, go. before we all have to say "Bye Bye" to our and our kids future.
    If it were a straight choice between socialism (Marxism) or Capitalism then I'd choose socialism every time "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need", if only...but It's not that simple is it. We have recently seen capitalism in action, greedy millionaire bankers who have for years been telling the government that intervention equals socialism and in a capitalist market place the financial industry will regulate and look after itself.

    We are now in a situation where the tax payer is propping up these capitalist go getters, these greedy arrogant Gordon Gekko types who pour scorn on the very idea of regulation but show absolutely no shame in asking the government to bail them out with £billions of the "peoples" money. And then we are told they are the best financial brains in the business and deserve (in the case of RBS, a nationalised bank) £1.5 billion in bonuses, it makes me sick to the pit of my stomach and if this is capitalism I want socialism/Marxism/Communism any bloody ...ism but not capitalism.
    It is not racist to be concerned about immigration.

  3. #33
    Trusted Member paralreg has some supporters paralreg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    yorkshire
    Posts
    1,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Rackham View Post
    If it were a straight choice between socialism (Marxism) or Capitalism then I'd choose socialism every time "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need", if only...but It's not that simple is it. We have recently seen capitalism in action, greedy millionaire bankers who have for years been telling the government that intervention equals socialism and in a capitalist market place the financial industry will regulate and look after itself.

    We are now in a situation where the tax payer is propping up these capitalist go getters, these greedy arrogant Gordon Gekko types who pour scorn on the very idea of regulation but show absolutely no shame in asking the government to bail them out with £billions of the "peoples" money. And then we are told they are the best financial brains in the business and deserve (in the case of RBS, a nationalised bank) £1.5 billion in bonuses, it makes me sick to the pit of my stomach and if this is capitalism I want socialism/Marxism/Communism any bloody ...ism but not capitalism.
    If you take a subjective view of this then it becomes apparent that in both historical and practical terms no one theory will suffice. Marxism is both outdated, and too advanced, to be relevant at this time. The great leap forward will only come when Capitalism becomes conjoined with Socialism, the nation being united by virtue of the fact it is two separate halves each supporting the other in a structured and BALANCED fashion. The wealth generating power of capitalism coupled with society developing socialist principles.
    The eradication of all political parties is a must as loyalty must only be to the country, and is not to be diluted or even diverted to party use. While the overall theme of government is of a socialist nature it must be prepared to protect the capitalist half against unreasonable or illegal attacks, while at the same time ensuring that it builds a "disaster fund" to enable it to survive on its own earnings in bad times. The government must reciprocate by cutting all non societal spending such as defence, foreign aid, EU contributions for example as well as probably hundreds more that will become apparent as we move forward. Only when we have built a strong Britain can we help nations around the world, if we do not stop giving now for a period of reconstruction and regeneration then eventually we will have nothing to give to anyone, EVER.
    We Spend More Trying to Eradicate Ourselves!
    Than We Do Trying to Educate Ourselves!

  4. #34
    Trusted Member Britannist is a jewel in the rough Britannist is a jewel in the rough Britannist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    27,513

    Default

    Prime Minister Gordon Brown MP could still call a General Election to be held before Easter:

    Prime Minister Brown could this week call a General Election on 25.3.2010
    Abort Abortion.

  5. #35
    Senior Member Unsheepled has some supporters Unsheepled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    713

    Default

    Quote Paralreg said
    The great leap forward will only come when Capitalism becomes conjoined with Socialism, the nation being united by virtue of the fact it is two separate halves each supporting the other in a structured and BALANCED fashion. The wealth generating power of capitalism coupled with society developing socialist principles.
    Unquote
    Sounds good ,sounding like money will serve the people ............and people will serve the money .


    How do you plan to do this i ask ?
    Paraleg said Quote
    The eradication of all political parties is a must as loyalty must only be to the country, and is not to be diluted or even diverted to party use.
    Unquote

    This is so funny coming from the British Isles as a solution to injustice to ordinary working people .
    What you have just told me is you believe in a one world utopia ran by one ideoligy ....scaled down to a national level for the purpose of governing a country instead of the world .

    Party politics is the only official avenue to expose injustice .......and you just want to blow it all away for to put the aimes of the country ......above the justice for the people who live in it .
    Doing away with party politics is saying to do with debate ........and if a crime being brought to light by voicing oppinion or protest by a group is deemed detrimental to the country as a whole ...........to hell with justice and save the face of a the country ...............throw them in jail for being unpatriotic ........and let them out when they have learned to get over their abuse to serve the land again .

    Who decides what people want .? hope your not going to say Social scientists ( very scarey )

    Doesnt that smack of oppression .......to hell with justice and save the country from itself .

    NO THANKS .....................its not how its ever been done before ....and i hope it never is .

    Unless i'm getting your statements wrong ?

  6. #36
    Senior Member Unsheepled has some supporters Unsheepled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    713

    Default

    What Paraleg says reminds me of when i first watch a documentary called "Zeitgiest the movie " ......my word i thought why isnt this being brought into action ........the best that a country can produce they said the world even ................i thought flippedy doo ..i'll have some of that .

    That was until an interview with its maker by a critic ...said .............so what will happen in this new world of fine produce .....will we still have homes was asked ?

    Get this ...Peter Jackson the maker of the film said " you will have somewhere to go when you want to be alone "

    WWWWWHHHHOOOOOOOOOOO i said ....the film never said anything about that ................i've never believed in a utopia since lol i'll take the rythum of life and the love hate relationship of politics thankyou very much

    These blokes dont know that ....an Englishmans home ....is his Castle
    Last edited by Unsheepled; 28-02-2010 at 08:54 PM.

  7. #37
    Junior Member Enigma45 is just starting out
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Oh to see that day. Proper Socialism at work once more.

  8. #38
    Trusted Member flamingreen is a jewel in the rough flamingreen is a jewel in the rough flamingreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Britannia!
    Posts
    2,425

    Default

    Yes and its not just John Smith, there are doubts about Robin Cooks sudden death too.

  9. #39
    Trusted Member flamingreen is a jewel in the rough flamingreen is a jewel in the rough flamingreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Britannia!
    Posts
    2,425

    Default

    Did New World Order Fabians murder John Smith MP?: Was John Smith murdered?

    John Smith was a traditional Old Labourite. If he had lived and gone on to win the 1997 General Election, there would not have been New Labour in its present form.

    One of the main differences between Old Labour and New Labour is that New Labour is Fabian.

    John Smith was not a Fabian. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are Fabians.

    The ultimate objective of the Fabians is to create a One World Communitarian ('Third Way') government. This ties in with the New World Order project.

    John Smith was not a One World Communitarian and would have been distrusted by the NWO/Bilderberg brigade who wanted someone at the head of the UK government whom they could manipulate.

    Strange things have been happening in Britain in recent years. For example, the police have lost their common sense.

    This is because Fabian New Labour has a hidden agenda.

    The management mechanism being used to carry out the true and hidden agenda of Fabian New Labour is a fraudulent 'educational charity' called Common Purpose. You can find out more about Common Purpose here: Stop Common Purpose Communitarian Totalitarian EUSSR and here: Common Purpose Exposed - cpexposed.com

    Remember, the NWO/Bilderberg group are playing for extremely high stakes and have no qualms about getting rid of people who stand in their way. Fabian New Labour are, after all, quite willing to join wars started on the basis of lies.

    There are literally no depths to which this institutionally-corrupt Fabian New Labour government will not descend: multi-billion Eurofraud, relentless and ruthless abuses of citizens, lying, cheating, secrecy, going to war on the basis of lies, oppressive social control, abrogating sovereign rule to Brussels, corruption, deceit, fraud, treachery, bankrupting the country and so on.

    So the motive for murder - get rid of John Smith in favour of a Fabian (Tony Blair) who would have been happy to go along with the Fabian/Bilderberg/NWO One World Communitarian Government project.

  10. #40
    Junior Member Enigma45 is just starting out
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    32

    Default

    It's my firm belief that Bliar set out from the onset to destroy real socialism in this land. After all he came from a Tory family so he was infected with that philosophy from birth.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts