Thread: Why did Labour allow border to get out of control?

Originally Posted by longbow64

And if a minority right wing party could really convince the hard voting staunch Labour voters of this, and that these migrants only have to fill in an electoral role to vote, then they might actually get somewhere.

I think you should need to produce a British passport or a birth certificate to vote, the poor British people having another of Labours cynical con tricks to gain votes. It's bad enough that the Tories need 5 more political points just to draw even with them in an election. Can someone explain how that one works!

Starting from your last point. The boundaries are being redrawn for the next election, so it should now be balanced.

Don't hope that the Tories are going to stop what NuLab did, they will carry on the same. Just Google Mode 4 immigration to see what's coming.

The problem is, on the Left you have the Marxists, who don't like sovereign countries or national borders, so they like immigration as it dilutes any bond with the country. On the other side, the Right, you have the corporatists, who have no attachment to their country (they can go anywhere to make money, London, New York, Sydney, it doesn't matter) only to money. So they are happy to have immigration because it causes wage deflation and boosts profits.

The rich have never had an attachment to their country, only the poor do, because they are limited in their geographical mobility, i.e. they're stuck with where they were born generally. That's why they're happy to go and fight the wars for the rich, because they believe it is in the belief that they're saving their country and way of life.

The Left and the Right go hand in hand. The Marxists Greenies demand windfarms because of climate change (it's a control thing which Marxists desire, a bit like enforced recycling, most if which goes in landfill anyway) and the corporatists say, great, we'll build as many windfarms as you like, and the taxpayer will subsidise them and we'll make large profits. It's just a transference of wealth from the poor (taxpayer) to the rich (corporatists).

It's why there's no difference between voting for the LibLabCon, apart from a few tweeks they're all the same.