Thread: Please read my free internet book 'Britain faces the threat of Anglocide'

Mr Wilders of the PVV party in my country is giving conditional support to the coalition cabinet of two other parties. In September, he warned them that “2012 will become the year of the truth”. He was referring to agreements he wants to see realized, or else he might withdraw his support and then the cabinet would fall. What I don’t understand, is his focus on 2012. What’s wrong with 2011? It isn’t over yet. Still three weeks to go. This year can still become the year of the truth. Including some truths we never hear Mr Wilders talk about.

Richard

A commission reported that from 1945 to 2010, between 10,000 to 20,000 children were sexually abused in Catholic institutions in The Netherlands.

Predictably, the findings are grist to the mill of those influentials who, in their hatred of Christianity, now seize the indignation of the Dutch as an opportunity to incite the Dutch people against Christianity once more.

Yet leaving the anti-Christian propaganda aside, the facts which the commission found remain what they are - disgusting. In my view, the celibacy is the main culprit. I simply don’t understand on which New Testamentical basis the Roman Catholic church is making things so difficult for itself and, consequently, for the children trusted to its care. I feel sad writing this, because I have great respect for all the good the Church of Rome has brought and brings.

I am looking at the abusing RC clergymen from the following perspective: appalling as their wrongs were, it is a stain on a Christian church only, i.e. on an organization of fallible humans. It is by no stretch of the imagination a stain on the Christian ideal. All humans are fallible; the ideal isn’t. In fact, the Christian ideal unalteredly offers mankind the brightest thinkable ‘Pole Star’ to help compass itself out of its pain and troubles, to a world marked by respect for the truth, by harmony and by happiness.

There is also a report of the Dutch Health Council, that stated that in today’s non-Catholic institutions, staggering numbers of children a year are being abused, either sexually, physicly or psychicly. It just goes to show how powerful evil has become, and for that reason alone, it’s absolutely necessary for all the Christian churches to ban evil from their own ranks as much as possible, to become the stronger in their spiritual fight against evil in the outside world.

Richard

Earlier on this forum, some have said they don’t understand what I am on about. In this post, I will go into what’s driving me, me with my Christian patriotic ideal.

I was born in 1958. That means that my memory goes back to the 1960s, and when I see how society has changed over the decades, I see a lot of serious deteriorations. I will never say that everything was better in the past, but a lot of important things were. In the first place, people treated each other more friendly and more respectful than they do know. There was far less distrust. In the second place, over the decades, the socalled ordinary people got a number of changes imposed on them that no majority of voters ever deliberately asked for.

Now, if you are from the 1940s or before, you’ll have a better overview than I have. Yet, if you are from, say, the 1970s or later, it will be much harder for you to understand what I mean. So therefore, and this is very important to me, if you are a lot younger than I am, I do hope you will show this text to your parents, your grandparents, other older people whose opinion you value, and please listen carefully to what they think of it.

Where to begin?

It hasn’t always been so that many adults are afraid to criticize misbehaving youths in the streets, fearing they might be beaten up or worse. There was a time it was considered normal that adults reprimanded misbehaving youths in public places, making them feel ashamed.

There was a time great value was attached to dignity and honour, to a good reputation and to modesty. There was a time people knew far better that you can’t just say everything that comes into your head. It hasn’t always been so that the daily conversations around us are packed with sexual innuendo. It was frowned upon to make women feel uncomfortable in that way.

The shops haven’t always had to install expensive rolldown shutters. We haven’t always had CCTV cameras everywhere, humiliatingly monitoring our every step. It hasn’t always been so that even in hospitals and cemeteries, people have to be wary of thieves. There was a time lowlife conduct like that was simply unthinkable. The last couple of years a new kind of TV programmes has emerged, about life in prisons and in gangs, with a lot of attention for inmates and gang members, an awkward kind of attention that seem to want to grow sympathy for these people. There was a time that was unthinkable also. Society as a whole was undivided in its rejection of the criminal mentality.

People haven't always immediately gone to court, when they had a disagreement with someone else. Former mayor of Amsterdam Schelto Patijn once complained that his local government could count on three years of lawsuits, when it wanted to change the layout of a square in the city. There was a time people were more willing to please one another, to settle their differences in a friendly manner. I learnt what “to sue” means in the 70s, from the American TV series of the period, because in every Mannix or Kojak or Columbo episode, there was always at least one aggrieved person who promised someone else he would “sue his ass”. (You can “sue someone’s ass”. It’s just one example of what TV has been “teaching” the Western nations.)

There weren’t always Africans, Asians, Arabs, East Europeans, living in our cities and countries, in ever increasing numbers. Dutch citizens haven’t always felt strangers in those streets where the foreigners are now in the majority, and I am sure a lot of Britons and other Europeans have the same uncomfortable feeling. On television, there haven’t always been Africans, Arabs and Asians with British and Dutch passports, lecturing that the British and the Dutch should “adjust” themselves to this “new globalized world”. There was a time that Great Britain was simply the land of the British, that The Netherlands was simply the land of the Dutch, that France was the land of the French and so on, and no-one was unhappy with that.

The BBC wasn’t always able to film two long unemployed Britons, who made an uninspiring impression in comparison to hard working successful foreigners in the same programme. Perhaps you’ve seen it too, it was this or the other year. There was a time every Briton and every Dutchman and every other European knew you have to do your best at school and you ought to work for your money. People who remember the 1950s and 1960s know what I am talking about. Yet, as from the 1960s, the welfare state began to show its mad and highly unjust side, when those who clearly didn’t want to work, also got benefits. Again, please ask your parents and grandparents, they’ll know what I mean.

Our countries haven’t always had the widespread availability of that ultimate insult of love, pornography. Our countries haven’t always been countries where people with children, complaining about misconducting homosexuals in a park nearby their homes, are told by the local authorities they are perhaps “homophobic”. Television and the newspapers haven’t always been pouring the squalor of the world in full detail in our living-rooms. There was a time society allowed our children to keep their innocence and to enjoy a happy carefree childhood.

Our countries haven’t always been pestered by drug problems. What do a lot of people think of when they hear ‘The Netherlands’? The socalled coffee shops. Cannabis. Drugs. Yet do you think that The Netherlands have always been a drugs-infected country? Absolutely not. I once had a talk with my mother about this. In her teens, in the 1950s, she was a big fan of American singer-actor Frank Sinatra, like many other Western girls of the period. She saw every film featuring him, and so, when ‘The Man With The Golden Arm’ was released in 1955, she saw that film too. Yet she told me that at the time, she actually didn’t understand what the film was about. The explanation is simple. At the time, my mother and her generation had no idea what a heroin addiction is, and how difficult it is for an addict to free himself from it on his own, and those were the themes of that film.

Had The Netherlands been properly ruled in the past 50 years, i.e. had the Dutch courts given deterringly severe prison sentences to the first **** that engaged in drug trade on Dutch soil, the drug problem in my country would never have risen to the scale it sadly has now. The same goes for other countries as well, of course.

Materialism hasn’t always been god in America and Europe. What was one of the first things President Bush said after 9/11? “Don’t let the terrorists disturb our way of life. Go to a shopping mall.” My goodness…! The last couple of years, we are supposed to be deeply impressed by what the credit rating agencies are deciding in their wisdom. “Moody’s downgrades status of Belgium”, that kind of headlines. What did President Sarkozy say, some weeks ago? “If the euro exploded, Europe would explode. And in fact it's the guarantee of peace on the continent where there were terrible wars, fiercer than anywhere else in the world, not in the 15th century but in the 20th century" (source: CBC News).

I beg your pardon? What was that again?? Is he out of his mind or what?! We’re talking about a currency here, nothing more than that. After 1945, Europe rebuilt itself and achieved prosperity, while all the nations had their own currencies.

Abortion… I believe that the abortion figures in the West are now running in their tens of millions, over the past four or five decades, deceived as we are into believing that abortion is a “right”. Nowadays, young women undergo two or three abortions, as if it were some sort of overdue contraception, as BBC Newsnight showed some time ago. Who would have dreamed such excesses ever possible, fourty years ago?

The Netherlands haven’t always had useless laws that enabled a convicted sex offender from Latvia to enter our country and to become a day care centre worker, who now stands accused of wallowing in depravity with over 80 very young children.

We haven’t always had this Europe, where deranged people grab a gun, take to the streets or go to their school, to shoot unsuspecting people at random, like we’ve seen happen in Germany, Finland, Belgium, in my country, in yours, in the last couple of years. When I was a teenager, in the 1970s, that sort of thing only happened in America, bad enough as it was.

You know what, I’ll leave it just there. I hope I haven’t depressed you too much - but look at us now. Look at us now. And we owe it all to the 1960s rise to power of people with “progressive” and “liberal” and “enlightened” ideas - and we also owe it to our own naieveté, diffidence and passivity. I am almost getting depressed by it all myself, if it wasn’t for my belief that God will once bring the reversal.

He will, on the day of His choice, in whichever way He thinks fit.

My moralizing justifies the question: am I “holier than thou”? Probably not, but that doesn’t matter. For a better future, we have to focus on the better ideas, on the ideas that proved their merit throughout the centuries, and not gaze at the flaws of this or that person. So for the above goes: it doesn’t matter who is saying it. What matters is, that it has to be said.

So again, if you were born much later than 1958, please show this post to your parents and grandparents, print it if they haven’t got internet, let them read it and listen carefully to their opinion. I bet it will resonate with them. That’s important, because when the Christian Patriotic parties will see the light of day in Europe, these parties will need that generation’s stories to increase their fighting chance, in order to winch our countries out of the swamp they are in now.

Remarkably, the future of Europe needs the eyewitnesses of its past.

Richard


See also the MailOnline article:

‘This isn’t the Britain we fought for’, say the ‘unknown warriors’ of WWII
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html

…and please note the gracious yet corrective tone of voice of the journalist.



Britain faces the threat of Anglocide
Long live the Jews, down with Torahism
Please read my free internet book on www.ibcpp.org.uk

Britain, The Netherlands, Europe are in very big trouble, in my view. Our countries urgently need new political parties, Christian Patriotic parties, and it is very important to know what Torahism is. Please read my main text at www.ibcpp.org.uk

If you come to agree with my views, please always remember that the only way out is a peaceful and patient way. Not a single foreigner or Jew can be held responsible for the country's present situation. Avoid confrontations that can easily turn overheated. Don't react to provocations. Please don't view the avoiding as cowardice. It isn't. Be strong, be calm and calm down others if their anger may cause them to do foolish things.

Long live the Jews, down with Torahism.

A merry and inspiring Christmas to you all

A world that sees the Christian ideas for what they truely are, is better off than the world we live in now, where the Western nations’ view of Christianity is blurred, by the overexposure of scandals for instance, and where both the old parties and the old media are pushing the nations to join them in their worship of that deceptive pseudo religion of ‘equality’ and ‘tolerance’;

a world that is aware of the roots, existence and dangers of Torahism, and seeks to contain it in a civilized manner, is better off than the world we live in now, confused by the false image of Jews always only being the victims, never the perpetrators, a false image that makes most of us mentally defenceless against Torahism;

a world that is aware of Torahism, without ever forgetting the depths their hatred of the Jews made the Nazis sink to, is better off than a world where independently thinking benevolent people are living in fear to see their career destroyed by the old media label ‘anti-Semite’ or ‘neo-Nazi’;

the world we live in now, where Torahism, possessed by mortal fear of its own (!) god, by greed and by eternal revengefulness, continues to be allowed to go on the rampage, unreportedly, this present world where in the European countries the Christian ethics are undermined and where multi-ethnicity is pushed (both are ways of slowly ruining a nation), where countless people are being disorientated by streams of contradictory information and half truths flooding from the TV screens, where the economy has been brought in dangerous turmoil, where the nations are plunged into unrest and prepared for new wars – that poor world will once make way for a world where Jews and non-Jews publicly address the Torahist issue and agree that Torahism is a threat to real democracy, real justice and real peace;

and that better world is - so I hope, no, so I believe - nearing day by day.

I wish you a good and clarifying 2012.

Richard

In December 2009, President Obama went to Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize, while America was engaged in two wars. He delivered a speech in which he said: ‘…for make no mistake. Evil does exist in the world’.

It seems to me he was taking a stance there against that most confusing of opinions, held in some intellectual circles, that there is neither good nor evil. Now, I am sure Mr Obama and I think differently about what the good, the not so good, the bad and the really evil ideas are – boy, would I love to have an internet debate with him or his successor on that - but at least I agree with him that there is evil in the world, and consequently, also a conflict between good and evil – in fact, many cultures and religions have been acknowledging the existence of that struggle from the beginnings of history.

And in that conflict, there is nothing that fills evil with more hate and malice than seeing good in action. Then, evil sees what it hasn’t got a shred of itself. It is only the light of good that unavoidably confronts evil with its lightless self. Evil hates good for that and it will lash out to try to hurt good. The most mean, the most sordid, the most insultive thing to do or say is hardly mean, sordid or insultive enough, then. Yet, while evil is complimenting itself over the creativity of its latest secretion of acidic pus, while it is gloating over the pain and sadness it caused, its self-gratification is never fully able to push aside a certain unpleasant self-knowledge. In the presence of good, evil can never fully suppress the nagging awareness of its own unfathomable inferiority. One finds it hard to determine whether one feels contempt for evil or, perhaps surprisingly, pity, for evil will be mankind’s biggest loser, once.

No… not pity. Just sheer contempt.

Richard

To the newcomers:

In case you are reading this, welcome to the forum. Sorry I don’t greet you on your own thread, but every post can always lead to an interesting discussion, and I want all the discussions I am participating in, to take place on this single thread*. May your posts help enlighten us all here.

Kind regards, Richard

*Not that there are many discussions going on right now, but your entry may perhaps change that...!

Prince Johan Friso is the second son of Her Majesty Queen Beatrix of The Netherlands. Yesterday in Austria, he was struck by an avalanche while skiing, and he is now fighting for his life in a hospital. My thoughts are with the Dutch Royal Family, my hopes are for the best.

Richard