Executive "Q"

I was previously posting under a different ID. Regrettably due to the activities of a suspected BNP operative (or possibly someone with even more sinsiter links) I was forced to temporarily withdraw due to serious breach of the Chatham Houe Rule and a malicious attempt to identify me so that my name and allegations could be picked up by search engines.

Sadly there are always one or two idiots who don't seem to be very bright themselves, or at any rate haven't got enough intelligence of their own to bring themselves to discuss intel related topics seriously, and certainly don't have the ability either to absorb or debate intelligence related topics in a serious way.

I do in fact work, overtly, in the intelligence community, indeed one would have to be fairly moronic not be to able to work that out but a small minority cannot bring themselves to accept my intekl credentials. whom I entertain far more contempt than they have for me. I seriously question not just the integrity but also the mental health of such individuals.

This is not the fauldt of UKIP but I warn UKIP against infiltration by BNP and international operatives.

chikrodah

Hello, Bentley Turbo. I wondered when you'd be back. :twisted:

Just because some forum users don't agree with you doesn't automatically mean they're BNP, you know. But of course, as a good IntOp, you'd know that already.

No doubt you'll also tread that thin line between opinion and libel carefully as well.

I look forward to your posts.

Aardvark

No Chatham House Rules here mate!!! This is the Internet, an open source of rumour and speculation for all.

Debating intel related subjects is one thing, coming up with unsubstantiated and historically inaccurate assertions is another.

I am happy to debate with anybody on intel related topics, even fellow Gray's Inn members. :wink:

What I do find frustrating is when people don't provide source references for novel asseverations. It's not that I think you're necessarily wrong, but if you are a half way decent lawyer you'd know to have all of your cases and statutes cross referenced before a case comes to trial and all of your evidence would have to be of a very high standard. Your posts were not of the standard that I would expect from someone with your supposed reputation.

I think you'll find that UKIP is aware of the BNP threat.

International operatives???? Are we paranoid or what?

Intbel

Nah ... it's them wot is paranoid which is why they is out to get you :shock:

__________________
We are all free to choose - every step of the way - no exceptions.

White knight

As Mr T would say in the A Team YOU CRAZY FOOL!

Aardvark

Why me? :cry:

Why not you? :roll:

Intbel

__________________
We are all free to choose - every step of the way - no exceptions.

mkpdavies

Hello "Q".

Can you make me a pen that fires a poison dart?

__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Millennium3

Hi Q.

What about invisible ink?

Executive "Q"

Laugh all you like. Those who move in the kind of circles in which I move are only too aware of the seriousness of the situation.

We who serve our land in intelligence are guardians of the people's safety and the safety of our liege lady HM Queen Elizabeth II

Recent press comment has focused on new initiatives by the Freemasonry community. Much of this comment is ill-founded. Most UK Freemasons are under the control of that excellent fellow Field-Marshal HRH The Duke of Kent. Nothing to fear there. But remember that there are "good masons" and "bad masons"

Under surveillance are the nefarious actiuvities of the Oriental Lodges of France and Germany, with connections to the terror centre of Egypt and to the Illuminati.

There can be little doubt that the Oriental lodge is linked to the DVD and Trilat networks of treason.