Good Bye - Forum Resignation

[Peter_North]

If mkpdavies is a BNPer then I'm Ghengis Kahn.

[brian pearson]

I think this raises a big problem we face in this country. Debate on immigration, the failure of multiculturism etc etc is being quashed because of the fear people have in being labled a racist BNP member.

I am neither of the above but feel these issues are of huge importance. I know of people who tell me they intend to vote BNP out of frustration. UKIP needs firm policies in this area and should not be afraid to stand up to the cries of racism from the media.

Apologies if this is being addressed or I am in the wrong thread but the public need to know where UKIP stand on this.

[C_steam]

True. Why not start a thread to explorre the idea of how UKIP can have a position on such matters without being branded 'racist'.

[Greg Lance-Watkins]

Hi,

if Matt is as he claims 'gutted'

are we to believe he is no longer MKPDavies just plain
MDavies?

or does it mean he isn't BNP he is merely BP?

By the way now that he has crawled out from the fluff under the kitchen dresser I wonder why no one has welcomed Ghengis Khan to this list!

As for the suggestion of a thread for BNP how about a rope!

Regards,
Greg

[Oliver]

I always understood Matt kept the KP in to show he was nuts? perhaps not!
Leave Matt alone he's a good egg!
I for one voted for him!!!!!!!!!

[mkpdavies]

Hurrah.

The reason I keep the KP in, for those who are interested, is that there are very few mkpdavies's on the web, but a bazillion mdavies, thus I chose the more unique username.

[FredSucks]

What a strange way to leave a forum.

I am not aware of any BNP views on this forum

ED

[Independence Now!]

Originally Posted by C_steam

True. Why not start a thread to explorre the idea of how UKIP can have a position on such matters without being branded 'racist'.

No party that wants the media's approval or backing can take a firm and restrictive stance on immigration/asylum (especially if the immigration is non-European) can do this.

Now, the question to any party is do you want the media's backing/non-biaed reporting or do you want to have the restrictive policy as it seems you can't have both.

[girlfriday]

Perhaps "Guest" was an agent provocateur of an existing site guise? (no! not me!)

[landmarker]

Originally Posted by brian pearson

I think this raises a big problem we face in this country. Debate on immigration, the failure of multiculturism etc etc is being quashed because of the fear people have in being labled a racist BNP member.

I am neither of the above but feel these issues are of huge importance. I know of people who tell me they intend to vote BNP out of frustration. UKIP needs firm policies in this area and should not be afraid to stand up to the cries of racism from the media.

Apologies if this is being addressed or I am in the wrong thread but the public need to know where UKIP stand on this.

I am not a BNP member but I have voted for them - twice. Mainly as a protest in an attempt to wake up mainstream parties INTO phpbb_doing something about completely unfettered immigration. I have also voted ukip twice. In an effort to do the same. Now the main parties have all displayed their ineptitude in dealing with the issues closest to my heart, like immigration/EU membership etc. I shall continue to vote for fringe parties.

landmarker