LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Did nano-thermite take down the WTC? | Politics from 2009-07-09 | RT
Could the most audacious terrorist attack in history be a “sophisticated masterpiece of demolition”?
That’s what chemistry professor Niels Harrit has been asking, following his investigation of the World Trade Centre rubble, which has revealed traces of explosives.
RT: Professor Niels Harrit, you examined the rubble that came from the World Trade Center. What did you find in it?
Niels Harrit: Well, in there we find the remains of what we characterize as thermetic material, and this is a very energetic material which can be used either for melting iron, or it can be designed as an explosive.
Russia Today is on Sky. I wonder for how much longer.
I've tried to forget the whole issue of 9/11 as I just thought it was always going to fall on deaf ears but when you here people like this talking on Russia Today which is main stream news you can no longer deny that what ever really went on that day the official story is a joke.
Cheers Mat got the interview here on youtube.
YouTube - Nano-thermite took down the WTC?
Matt, can I ask you what you think happened and why? Who ever did it, Al-Q or USA, it was very well planned with the biggest **** up being the attack on the Pentagon. But even that seems to have been papered over.
Is it worth looking into this? What would be gained by proving that it was a US governmental plot? The fall out would cause so many problems that I am not sure it is even worth going there.
It is much bigger than a US Government plot. Go back to the video posted by (I think it was Watt Tyler). The BBC coverage announced the collapse of Building #7 five or ten minutes before it actually happened. Whilst the news of the collapse was being announced by the woman presenter from New York, building 7 was STILL INTACT and was visible through the window of the room the broadcast was made from. The BBC was involved in the conspiracy and by implication so was the Blair government. The Twin Towers and building 7 was owned by the Jewish businessman Silverstein. Shortly before the attack the three buildings were insured so that the owner obtained complete cover for the loss of the buildings. There were many Jews who worked in the building. From reports I have read there were only 3 Jewish casualties. The rest of them stayed away from work that morning.
RIP the 2600 innocent casualties who were murdered by these bar5tards as an excuse to start the wholely fictitious War on Terror.
MKP and Roland. Respect to you both
Angelman
"Is it worth looking into this? What would be gained by proving that it was a US governmental plot? The fall out would cause so many problems that I am not sure it is even worth going there?"
As Neils Harrit says in the Video:
"Once you have realised this there is no way back. You can either speak out or you can live in shame".
I think more people have they're suspicions from the media to public figures like politicians than would let on for exactly that reason. The fall out would make the french revolution look like a play ground fight.Originally Posted by angelman
I have no idea what actually happened. All I know is large parts of it stink and I don't just accept the instant story they whipped up at the time.
Given the amount of people killed and the disgusting attack on liberty with this used as an excuse since, I think we deserve much more.
I want to know why the buildings collapsed the way they did from fire. Especially building 7.
I want to see all the CCTV footage around the pentagon that has been hidden from us.
I want to see accountability for the fact the US airforce went to sleep for that day, when they scramble like nutters of small craft going astray normally.
I want to know why the Bin Laden family were flown out of the country within hours of it all happening.
There are a lot of questions actually, that I have not seen valid answers for. Given the consequence of 9/11, disastrous ones like Iraq, Afghanistan and all the **** laws they have put in place and money wasted. All the climate of fear that they have whipped up and hatred and suspicion this has caused, means we deserve a decent forensic analysis of all the facts.
All we have had is whitewash and secrecy. I don't trust governments at the best of times. They have a history of lying, **** up and in some cases evil. Given the kind of person who succeeds in politics, IE the most willing to lie, cheat, steal etc and given the US was/is the most powerful nation on earth, I don't doubt at least some of their top tier truly are evil.
Just because the truth could be hard to stomach, doesn't mean we shouldn't go there. The truth could well turn out to be they were fundementally right, but there was some terrible **** ups that were covered up. Even that is worth finding out, as we can only learn from mistakes.
If it turns out that there was some inside involvement though, then once again the people of this planet need to know that and the people involved held to account. Then we can start undoing much of the damage they have done to our societies ever since.
Last edited by mkpdavies; 10-07-2009 at 05:13 AM.
If there is a conspiracy, it also means that the conspirators are in total control of Al Qaeda. The thing that you will not get people to do very easily, except for ideological reasons, is to commit suicide. Therefore in order to get the planes to crash into the tower, you either have to have remote controlled ones with no passengers on board, or more likely, terrorists to do it who are happy to commit suicide. So, if there is a conspiracy, it means that the suicide pilots were played/controlled like puppets at the whim of the conspirators, to do what they wanted, when they wanted.
The US defence budget for 2008 seemed to be USD 762 billion. A lot of money! Seems that quite a few people benefit from war.
File:U.S. Defense Spending - 2006 to 2010.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks