History Of The Globalist Movement

libertylover · 27-04-2008, 05:37 PM

This worldwide globalist movement worships money, power, control.

Two books I wish each household owned would be the Holy Bible
and Carroll Quigley's book, Tragedy and Hope.

The below website references so much knowledge on secret societies, the members involved, and their goals of future one world.

Members who are royalty of the world, military-industrial complex,
industrialist, media, governments, academia/scientists, international
bankers, lawyers, trusts/foundations, religious leaders, etc.

This one world will be. We can stay it off but it will becoma a reality.

Project for the Exposure of Hidden Institutions - Introduction

Olympic Flame · 29-04-2008, 12:14 PM

The ruling elites we see today, may they be the Media, mainstream government parties and industries have common interest, and hence it is natural that they have common voice in certain issues. But I don't think it is as powerful or as secretative as a "conspiracy".

Baron von Lotsov · 29-04-2008, 03:17 PM

The way I see it is there is a populous with a certain collective level of intelligence. They can only see so much. When taxes go up they can see it is bad for them, when crime becomes an issue they can see that too. What they very rarely see is the game of chess being played with their lives. These elite are very intelligent, nothing like the average MP. Most people don't realise the mechanisms of control, they are predictable, just like pieces on a chessboard work in a predetermined way. So rather than the elite pass instructions directly to the police they do something far cleverer. They set up the environment; they engineer the playing field so that when all the different groups respond in predetermined ways the outcome is achieved. Most people are not even looking at this, they respond in predetermined ways and as expected their struggle results in the noose tightening around their neck.

I'll give you one example to contemplate that I saw recently. Tescos were selling padded bras for seven year olds. Why would they do that? It was not an accident since the same firm was caught selling pole-dancing kits for the same age group. Now we have a problem with paedophiles and so people will want something done about it and there will be MPs standing up saying the new police powers are justifiable, in other words dealing with the problem in a superficial way, never the cause. These elite are social engineers, they know what they are doing, but if anyone points the finger they will get public ridicule. Why? Well that has been anticipated and sorted out as well. They operate below the radar, invisible and getting more so as the education system is dumbed down. Harry Potter, a book promoting the occult to children is now on the A level English literature course. Why?

It is clear that to deal with these problems one first of all needs to be looking at the right things. Don't blame the people; they are like rats in a Skinner Box, instead, look at who is building the box. Find out their political affiliations and low and behold a pattern will emerge. Once you have found traces of it you will then find all the major players. You will see they form nice neat clubs. They have an agenda; there is no doubt in my mind about that, just like they had an agenda to build the EU, and that goes back a long time. Some of the papers have now been declassified and we can identify the traitors of 40 years ago. To think that this does not happen now, a time when every agenda item is far more focused and consistent is very naive.

Ea of Dune · 29-04-2008, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Harry Potter, a book promoting the occult to children

Similar stories have been told to children since time immoral. As for why it is on the A level agenda? Well I would have thought that since it's been so popular it merits discussion maybe...

Ea of dune

Baron von Lotsov · 29-04-2008, 04:32 PM

So you can't see a problem with that then? Surely there is something more behind it than the author supposedly being a good writer. There are lots of good writers, but why this one? Look at the numbers, I think you will find that it has made more money than virtually any book, I forget the statistics but it is quite an incredible achievement for a single mother with not a lot to her name prior to this.

The only rational explanation I can attribute to this is on a parallel to the history of the Beatles. They had little talent, but they were plucked off the streets and, well you know the rest. People don't get chosen for their talent and often it is the reverse. When the elite want to dumb people down they need morons who are thick enough to think they are popular because they are so good at what they do. Often the ones who had a bit of talent and intelligence were the ones they had problems with in the past. They still have some problems with clever people who made it partly because of their talent. David Bellamy is a good example, he was smart and so when they wanted him to push global warming and the environment he rebelled. They wont make that mistake again, instead they will stick to what works, use people who are preferably both blackmailable and a little dense and even better someone who is very greedy and thinks only of money.

Ea of Dune · 29-04-2008, 05:03 PM

Quote:

So you can't see a problem with that then? Surely there is something more behind it than the author supposedly being a good writer. There are lots of good writers, but why this one?

No, just as I can't see a problem with Charles Dickins Christmas carol (which contains occult themes) which has been turned into numerous films and cartoons.
Nor Lord of the Rings which contains lots of Anglo-Saxon history intwined with the storyline as well as pre-Christian Anglo-Saxon beliefs. Once again a massively popular book (and a personal favourite of mine) which has also been turned into a series of films, a cartoon and given birth to the Fantasy/D&D sub culture.

What about any of the numerous childrens stories which have been incredibly popular over time which include such stories as Treasure Island for example?

Why do I think her books have done well? Probably because she is a good story teller, something which is different to being a good writer in grammatical sense.

Look at the Da vinci code, Dan Brown isn't the most competent of writers, but can spin a fantastic story. Harry Potter taps into the same vein.

Can you expand about the A-Level study of the Potter books please, can you can actually tell us what context they are dicussed at A-Level? Is it the prose or the story telling itself which is examined, or the world wide appeal of the story and how this relates to English?

Ea of dune

Baron von Lotsov · 29-04-2008, 05:20 PM

It was in the news the other day. Apparently it is being made a 'required reading book', which I think is something that is part of the core syllabus, rather than optional. I notice in the same article they talked about why they did not stick to quality books, which were regarded as challenging. A professor of English cited the Jane Eyre classic as a good example of a book that was on the A level curriculum.

I was about to agree with him but then I recalled reading that book at school about two years before doing my O levels and I did not even take the literature one, it was on the standard English O level list. I didn't find it challenging then, indeed it was about the only book I actually appreciated since we has some really dire ones to read like the book 'Of Mice and Men' and I hated all the slang and dumbing down in that. I was not good at English at all either, it was one of my weakest subjects and mainly because the reading material was so awful that the only thing I used to read were technical books. The Jane Eyre one inspired me though, it was the only one that did.

Ea of Dune · 29-04-2008, 05:33 PM

Quote:

really dire ones to read like the book 'Of Mice and Men' and I hated all the slang and dumbing down in that.

I thought Of Mice and Men was a fascinating book as it gives us a look inside the dust bowl era of the US. It wasn't "dumbed" down it was written from the perspective of people of the era. Plenty of excellent English literature uses this, Dickins is an example that comes to mind.
The Grapes of Wrath is also another example by the same author of the "Arkies and Okies" period of the dust bowl.

However the fact that English has taken a slapping as subject at both A-Level and degree level is something I agree with. Old English I believe is no longer a compulsory subject at some of our top red bricks which I think is a shame.

As for whether a Potter book should be on the syballus depends really. If it's for the discussion of contemporary popular literature and it's effect on culture then why not?

If it's purpose is to replace classics of English literature from Beowulf to the Canterbury Tales, through Utopia, Jane Eyre, Lord of the Rings then I agree that is silly.
I think though you need to teach contemporary popular literature as PART of English or the subject ends up in stasus at some arbitary point in history.

Ea of dune

libertylover · 29-04-2008, 05:39 PM

Early in childhood, humans develop psychological "denial" mechanism against painful truths that are either too horrific or fantastic for it to assimilate. Under certain circumstances, human beings will deny their reality, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. We see what we want to see, and not necessarily what is actually there in plain sight. The more terrible or fantastic the nature of reality, the more our conscious minds deny it. (Part of this is not my own words)

There must come a time this constant ring around the pony must stop.
This healthy way to cope in childhood must not used in adulthood. I
believe most humans adults are still stuck in their childhood ego defense mechanism "denial" which makes it impossible to "see", understand, and
grasp what is destroying our world. No, I do not think we will win the battle
over these evil doers but we will know what is happening, maybe stay it off awhile, be prepared, and plan according.

The most accepting of what is going on now are the spirtual community.
We believe the secret societies as the evil force called "Lucifers" who believe
the fallen angel "Lucifer" is the bearer of the "light" and God, our creator, is the evil force.

And, I feel a great sadness, English folks seem so ashame of even uttering the
word "God" in public. God is so powerful and unreachable in her/his original form he/she came to us as Jesus in the flesh to teach the ways for us to live our lives. Jesus lessons can be found the the parables and I read over and over parts of the Bible highlighted in red as this is God in the flesh Jesus
lessons for us flawed humans. I'm not a Christian but a follower of Jesus,
our God.

lukeair2006 · 30-04-2008, 01:55 PM

Cleon Skousens books 'The Naked Capitalist' and The Naked Communist' are a good source of information on the Globalist/Banking/New World Order elite. Cleon was an FBI agent and had inside knowledge on many of the issues. He also expands on much of what Caroll Quigley revealed in 'Tragedy and Hope'. Communism/Socialism is a ruse by the Elite to consolidate power and control over the masses. The man in the street is happy to be relieved of his earnings and his freedom in the misguided belief that this will somehow benefit the wider population.

Another book available to read or download on-line is: None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen published in 1971

27-04-2008, 05:37 PM	#1 (permalink)
libertylover Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: central Arkansas, USA Posts: 65	History Of The Globalist Movement This worldwide globalist movement worships money, power, control. Two books I wish each household owned would be the Holy Bible and Carroll Quigley's book, Tragedy and Hope. The below website references so much knowledge on secret societies, the members involved, and their goals of future one world. Members who are royalty of the world, military-industrial complex, industrialist, media, governments, academia/scientists, international bankers, lawyers, trusts/foundations, religious leaders, etc. This one world will be. We can stay it off but it will becoma a reality. Project for the Exposure of Hidden Institutions - Introduction __________________ “Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition”.

29-04-2008, 03:17 PM	#3 (permalink)
Baron von Lotsov Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 718	The way I see it is there is a populous with a certain collective level of intelligence. They can only see so much. When taxes go up they can see it is bad for them, when crime becomes an issue they can see that too. What they very rarely see is the game of chess being played with their lives. These elite are very intelligent, nothing like the average MP. Most people don't realise the mechanisms of control, they are predictable, just like pieces on a chessboard work in a predetermined way. So rather than the elite pass instructions directly to the police they do something far cleverer. They set up the environment; they engineer the playing field so that when all the different groups respond in predetermined ways the outcome is achieved. Most people are not even looking at this, they respond in predetermined ways and as expected their struggle results in the noose tightening around their neck. I'll give you one example to contemplate that I saw recently. Tescos were selling padded bras for seven year olds. Why would they do that? It was not an accident since the same firm was caught selling pole-dancing kits for the same age group. Now we have a problem with paedophiles and so people will want something done about it and there will be MPs standing up saying the new police powers are justifiable, in other words dealing with the problem in a superficial way, never the cause. These elite are social engineers, they know what they are doing, but if anyone points the finger they will get public ridicule. Why? Well that has been anticipated and sorted out as well. They operate below the radar, invisible and getting more so as the education system is dumbed down. Harry Potter, a book promoting the occult to children is now on the A level English literature course. Why? It is clear that to deal with these problems one first of all needs to be looking at the right things. Don't blame the people; they are like rats in a Skinner Box, instead, look at who is building the box. Find out their political affiliations and low and behold a pattern will emerge. Once you have found traces of it you will then find all the major players. You will see they form nice neat clubs. They have an agenda; there is no doubt in my mind about that, just like they had an agenda to build the EU, and that goes back a long time. Some of the papers have now been declassified and we can identify the traitors of 40 years ago. To think that this does not happen now, a time when every agenda item is far more focused and consistent is very naive. __________________ "A government big enough to supply you with everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have..."

29-04-2008, 04:32 PM	#5 (permalink)
Baron von Lotsov Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 718	So you can't see a problem with that then? Surely there is something more behind it than the author supposedly being a good writer. There are lots of good writers, but why this one? Look at the numbers, I think you will find that it has made more money than virtually any book, I forget the statistics but it is quite an incredible achievement for a single mother with not a lot to her name prior to this. The only rational explanation I can attribute to this is on a parallel to the history of the Beatles. They had little talent, but they were plucked off the streets and, well you know the rest. People don't get chosen for their talent and often it is the reverse. When the elite want to dumb people down they need morons who are thick enough to think they are popular because they are so good at what they do. Often the ones who had a bit of talent and intelligence were the ones they had problems with in the past. They still have some problems with clever people who made it partly because of their talent. David Bellamy is a good example, he was smart and so when they wanted him to push global warming and the environment he rebelled. They wont make that mistake again, instead they will stick to what works, use people who are preferably both blackmailable and a little dense and even better someone who is very greedy and thinks only of money. __________________ "A government big enough to supply you with everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have..."

29-04-2008, 05:20 PM	#7 (permalink)
Baron von Lotsov Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 718	It was in the news the other day. Apparently it is being made a 'required reading book', which I think is something that is part of the core syllabus, rather than optional. I notice in the same article they talked about why they did not stick to quality books, which were regarded as challenging. A professor of English cited the Jane Eyre classic as a good example of a book that was on the A level curriculum. I was about to agree with him but then I recalled reading that book at school about two years before doing my O levels and I did not even take the literature one, it was on the standard English O level list. I didn't find it challenging then, indeed it was about the only book I actually appreciated since we has some really dire ones to read like the book 'Of Mice and Men' and I hated all the slang and dumbing down in that. I was not good at English at all either, it was one of my weakest subjects and mainly because the reading material was so awful that the only thing I used to read were technical books. The Jane Eyre one inspired me though, it was the only one that did. __________________ "A government big enough to supply you with everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have..."

29-04-2008, 05:39 PM	#9 (permalink)
libertylover Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: central Arkansas, USA Posts: 65	Denial Early in childhood, humans develop psychological "denial" mechanism against painful truths that are either too horrific or fantastic for it to assimilate. Under certain circumstances, human beings will deny their reality, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. We see what we want to see, and not necessarily what is actually there in plain sight. The more terrible or fantastic the nature of reality, the more our conscious minds deny it. (Part of this is not my own words) There must come a time this constant ring around the pony must stop. This healthy way to cope in childhood must not used in adulthood. I believe most humans adults are still stuck in their childhood ego defense mechanism "denial" which makes it impossible to "see", understand, and grasp what is destroying our world. No, I do not think we will win the battle over these evil doers but we will know what is happening, maybe stay it off awhile, be prepared, and plan according. The most accepting of what is going on now are the spirtual community. We believe the secret societies as the evil force called "Lucifers" who believe the fallen angel "Lucifer" is the bearer of the "light" and God, our creator, is the evil force. And, I feel a great sadness, English folks seem so ashame of even uttering the word "God" in public. God is so powerful and unreachable in her/his original form he/she came to us as Jesus in the flesh to teach the ways for us to live our lives. Jesus lessons can be found the the parables and I read over and over parts of the Bible highlighted in red as this is God in the flesh Jesus lessons for us flawed humans. I'm not a Christian but a follower of Jesus, our God. __________________ “Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition”. Last edited by libertylover; 29-04-2008 at 05:41 PM. Reason: mistake

29-04-2008, 12:14 PM	#2 (permalink)
Olympic Flame Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 135	The ruling elites we see today, may they be the Media, mainstream government parties and industries have common interest, and hence it is natural that they have common voice in certain issues. But I don't think it is as powerful or as secretative as a "conspiracy".

30-04-2008, 01:55 PM	#10 (permalink)
lukeair2006 Newbie Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 3	naked everything Cleon Skousens books 'The Naked Capitalist' and The Naked Communist' are a good source of information on the Globalist/Banking/New World Order elite. Cleon was an FBI agent and had inside knowledge on many of the issues. He also expands on much of what Caroll Quigley revealed in 'Tragedy and Hope'. Communism/Socialism is a ruse by the Elite to consolidate power and control over the masses. The man in the street is happy to be relieved of his earnings and his freedom in the misguided belief that this will somehow benefit the wider population. Another book available to read or download on-line is: None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen published in 1971

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode