British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > International Politics


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-04-2008, 04:34 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,794
Party: None
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by British-Conservatism View Post
Look at the example I gave the Costa Rican Libertarians started taking state funds when they originally said they would not.
Greed.
Then going along with the left on certain issues in order to maintain support.
This is why and how Libertarianism evolved into Liberalism in the first place.
What are you talking about.

Liberalism existed long before libertarianism was even though of. Liberalism was, in a sense, the old version of the modern libertarian (take Bastiat, the earlier Mill, Smith (apart from perhaps book five) and Locke (for the most part) as examples.

Liberalism turned into socialism - c.f. Mill. Libertarianism was created much later, as a new name for those who could no longer call themselves liberals (although some still tried to cling onto it, such as Friedman). I would be happy to call myself a liberal, but nobody would understand what I meant.

But hell, even if you are right, at least you've been proactive in your choice of political party. Rather than start off with libertarianism and then descend into liberalism and so on. You've jumped right in the deep end and started with BNP socialism.

P.S. How does my own personal story of becoming a libertarian from being a left-wing liberal fit into your neat little picture of political ideologies?
__________________
Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state wants to live at the expense of everyone.

When goods do not cross borders, soldiers will.


-Frederic Bastiat
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 26-04-2008, 07:03 PM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,295
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by British-Conservatism View Post
Look at the example I gave the Costa Rican Libertarians started taking state funds when they originally said they would not.
Greed.
Then going along with the left on certain issues in order to maintain support.
This is why and how Libertarianism evolved into Liberalism in the first place.

They weren't Libertarians, they were crooks.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 08:33 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
British-Conservatism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 522
British-Conservatism is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
What are you talking about.

Liberalism existed long before libertarianism was even though of. Liberalism was, in a sense, the old version of the modern libertarian (take Bastiat, the earlier Mill, Smith (apart from perhaps book five) and Locke (for the most part) as examples.

Liberalism turned into socialism - c.f. Mill. Libertarianism was created much later, as a new name for those who could no longer call themselves liberals (although some still tried to cling onto it, such as Friedman). I would be happy to call myself a liberal, but nobody would understand what I meant.

But hell, even if you are right, at least you've been proactive in your choice of political party. Rather than start off with libertarianism and then descend into liberalism and so on. You've jumped right in the deep end and started with BNP socialism.

P.S. How does my own personal story of becoming a libertarian from being a left-wing liberal fit into your neat little picture of political ideologies?
When I refer to Libertarianism in this context I mean Classical Liberalism which evolved into New Liberalism (Social Liberalism) at the start of the last century under Asquith.
The reason for this was political survival.
Saving MP's jobs and wages.
British-Conservatism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 08:34 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
British-Conservatism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 522
British-Conservatism is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
They weren't Libertarians, they were crooks.
This is what you will have to guard against in your movement because it will happen here too if you gain any success.
British-Conservatism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 08:49 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,794
Party: None
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by British-Conservatism View Post
When I refer to Libertarianism in this context I mean Classical Liberalism which evolved into New Liberalism (Social Liberalism) at the start of the last century under Asquith.
The reason for this was political survival.
Saving MP's jobs and wages.
Then you have a poor grasp of what libertarianism is. I could count all the libertarian MPs this country has ever had on one hand. Furthermore, your argument stinks - consider Mill again. He stood for parliament and won, he was then voted out for trying to give women the vote. At least he was principled.
__________________
Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state wants to live at the expense of everyone.

When goods do not cross borders, soldiers will.


-Frederic Bastiat
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 08:50 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,794
Party: None
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by British-Conservatism View Post
This is what you will have to guard against in your movement because it will happen here too if you gain any success.
There are morons in every movement. This is not unique to libertarianism.
__________________
Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state wants to live at the expense of everyone.

When goods do not cross borders, soldiers will.


-Frederic Bastiat
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 09:05 AM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,001
The Bear is just starting out
Default

Isn’t the bottom line that anyone who is fixated with a single issue or a single obsession or a single objective at a marked disadvantage?

That every individual and especially every politician should hold views that are on a located on the continuum that exists between the two extremes regarding any issue?

That those who do not accept this position are actually not just at a disadvantage but actually probably to at least some degree psychotic?

After all, there are very very few absolute black’s or absolute white’s in nature, and even then what looks like white in one ambient light doesn’t in another.

In my own case I loath Islam with a passion, but even so I do see that it has a place in some societies, just not much of a place in ours!

So it surely is with ideologies such as libertarianism, socialism, capitalism, in fact all the “isms” that make up all the ideologies.

There is no single “ism” that is perfect and just as it is said that if you ever find the perfect church, don’t join it, so if you ever find the perfect “ism” don’t commit fully to it. Instead just take the best out of it to use in the best way that you can.

Thoughts?
__________________
Signature removed because it wound me up every time I read it!
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 09:20 AM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
British-Conservatism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 522
British-Conservatism is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
Then you have a poor grasp of what libertarianism is. I could count all the libertarian MPs this country has ever had on one hand. Furthermore, your argument stinks - consider Mill again. He stood for parliament and won, he was then voted out for trying to give women the vote. At least he was principled.
Mill lost his seat because he was an anti-British traitor who wanted Governor Eyre the crusher of the Jamaican rebelion jailed.
British-Conservatism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 09:22 AM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
British-Conservatism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 522
British-Conservatism is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
There are morons in every movement. This is not unique to libertarianism.
The point is principles are harder to maintain your movement than in mine because of your ideological stance.
British-Conservatism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 27-04-2008, 09:30 AM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,794
Party: None
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by British-Conservatism View Post
Mill lost his seat because he was an anti-British traitor who wanted Governor Eyre the crusher of the Jamaican rebelion jailed.
Another one of the reasons yes.

That made him a patriot and it is a shame people couldn't (and can't) see it.

I get the feeling you probably don't like him because of what he said about conservatives.

Governor Eyre was a murdering ass with no sense of justice whatsoever. Whether the rebels were right or wrong is a different matter - it does not justify some of the things he did.
__________________
Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state wants to live at the expense of everyone.

When goods do not cross borders, soldiers will.


-Frederic Bastiat
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and FuzzFizz
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0