British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > International Politics


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-03-2008, 02:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
George's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Zielona Gora, Poland
Posts: 192
George is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartlepool View Post
George, "...a large number of Iraqis want a hardline FIG....."
That's what I said and that's what is demonstrated by the situation on the ground.

Quote:
How many of the Iraqis make up this hardline FIG George?
"...a large number..."

Quote:
Who carried out the poll on the Iraqi population,and when was it done?
What poll?

Quote:
Did the poll tell them to indicate that they were or were not hardliners?
What poll?

Quote:
Isn't the Iraqi population made up of mainly Shiite,Sunnie and Kurdish Muslims from original and ancient Tribal areas of Iraq to which they could withdraw to,in peace.
The Kurds would be quite happy to have an autonomous or independent state in the north of Iraq. It won't happen because the Turks are against it. There has been a de facto Kurdish state since 2002. The Sunni and Shi'ite are religious groups, not ethnic or tribal groups. Suggesting they could withdraw to different areas and live in harmony is like suggesting that protestant Irish get the north, catholics get the south and everyone will be happy.

Quote:
They would then be without the war being extended because of foreign $10 a day insurgents from all over the world,but,especially from Pakistan?
Or far more likely they would be flooded by insurgents from all directions, Saudi, Pakistan, Jordan, Iran, Afghanistan, even the UK.
__________________
Jeszcze Polska nie zginęła,
Kiedy my żyjemy.
George is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 16-03-2008, 05:28 PM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North East England
Posts: 6,574
Hartlepool has some supporters
Default

George,to be polite,you have been evasive on this post.

You made a statement indicating "a large number" where did this "large number" you speak of come from?

Have you proof or a link on this statement that so many Iraqis want FIG?

If you quote "numbers,quantities" you should be able to support it with a link or some proof,that's all I'm saying,proof.
Hartlepool is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2008, 05:31 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 125
crac is just starting out
Default

I can understand that the Iraqi's are none to pleased with American combat boots all over their sacred soil but really they have to stop the willful and stupid destroyers of their own country by narrow minded religious extremism.

You can't call the west narrow minded religious and extreme in that way because there is a place where you can live happily and safely and practice whatever faith you choose, as long as you don't use that as an excuse to torture and murder your neigbours.

Why hasn't the water and electricity been fixed ???? Probably terror tactics on anyone trying to fix it and corruption and incompetance. The money to do the work has been available, there is money from selling oil if they would let it happen but they don't seem able to do even that.

They seem to be the kind of person whop can change their allegiences from week to week. EG; This month i'm murdering for this faction and next month i'm stealing for that faction and the month after i'll be working for the government and maybe i'll get to star in a BBC documentary.

Such a facinating people and culture, but i think the American and British should threaten them with no more money and lives at risk for them unless they grow up and move on from their harsh struggles under violent oppressors and stand up and make a go of becomeing a successful modern country, which they could do.
crac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2008, 09:57 PM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
George's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Zielona Gora, Poland
Posts: 192
George is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartlepool View Post
George,to be polite,you have been evasive on this post.
Obviously I cannot give you a number, are you expecting me to say 14,522,086 Iraqis want a fundamentalist islamic government? However, take into account the effectiveness of the IRA and the frequency of their attacks. Consider the effectiveness of the French resistance. Think about the numbers who supported each cause. It is impossible for such a lengthy and large scale insurgency to operate effectively without considerable support from the civilian population. I don't need to count the raindrops to know I am getting wet.

Quote:
You made a statement indicating "a large number" where did this "large number" you speak of come from?
Watching the news.

Quote:
Have you proof or a link on this statement that so many Iraqis want FIG?
The history of Iraq over the last four years makes it fairly obvious.

Quote:
If you quote "numbers,quantities" you should be able to support it with a link or some proof,that's all I'm saying,proof
.

The proof is the situation on the ground. Does anyone at all think for a second that were the troops to leave now there would be anything other than a bloody civil war? Given that around 65% of Iraqis are Shia compared with around 20% Sunni and 15% Kurds and given that the Shia are heavily supported by Iran, it doesn't take much to work out what kind of government there would be following a civil war.
__________________
Jeszcze Polska nie zginęła,
Kiedy my żyjemy.
George is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2008, 08:25 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,914
The Bear is just starting out
Default

I see the situation in a rather simple light.

Rightly or wrongly the US invaded Iraq and got rid of a piece of filth who may or may not have been the right guy to run the grot-hole that was Iraq.

The US together with Britain and a few others did their best to install a system that would have allowed the Iraqi people to move from the archaic oppressive regime that they lived under to a society that even with all it’s faults was a million times more progressive and overall much better than what they had.

They have shown it is not what the majority of them want.

So sod them

Leave them to sort out whatever rotten system, be it a theocracy, a dictatorship, a soviet, or whatever they want.

They had their chance to better themselves, they blew it, let them now live with the consequences.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2008, 11:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
Member
 
mattyr2k8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 103
mattyr2k8 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

we shouldve never gone in in the first place, the same politicians who sent our soldiers in to "give the iraqis democracy" are the ones giving away our democracy to eurocrats in brussels, and "iraq might maybe be supporting terrorism" isnt an excuse simply because the tiny amount of attempted terrorism is because of our aggressive foreign policy, which has killed 950k (250k in 1991, 600k in sanctions, 100k in the war) iraqis, and im sure less than maybe 10 of them would have ever posed a threat to the west.
mattyr2k8 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2008, 11:57 AM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,914
The Bear is just starting out
Default

The the 250 k who died in the '921 war and the 600k who died as a result of the sanctions are the absolute responisibility of Saddam.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2008, 06:15 PM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 125
crac is just starting out
Default

I don't think that the west should be held to the standard of people who routinely murder and torture their own breathren.

They are each and everyone personally responsible.

I'm sick of this murderous scum.

Let them rot in the cess pit they have made for themselves.

Let the figures speak for themselves. How many Iraqi's murdered and tortured by Iraqi's as compared to how many murdered and tortured by Americans or British troops. Never mind relative morality let the figures show the difference in the morality of the so called 'Western enemy'.

The real enemy is the Iraqi people on them selves as the figures prove.
crac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2008, 10:42 AM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 125
crac is just starting out
Default

It must have been something i ate,
That made me sick.

What i remember from many bleeding heart liberals and probably fellow travelers of several despotic regimes was the oft repeated thundering judgement that the war in Iraq represented the abbyss into which the moral legitimacy of the West would sink and be lost for ever.

Well it hasn't happened, so i'd like to take the opportunity of having a good laugh on their expense .

Good, i enjoyed that.

It certainly is a nasty business the conflict in Iraq but i think i was right that the Iraqi's need to be pushed to take responsibility for their own country. Why for example are they unable to prevent and take control of the situation of criminals and murderers from other countries infiltrating their borders.
crac is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2008, 10:52 AM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,914
The Bear is just starting out
Default

The problem is of course that there IS no single Iraq.

There is only one solution and that is let the sods fighhht it out for themselves but the problem is that as the coalition go out the front door the Iranians and the Syrians would come in through the back.

I’m increasingly seeing parallels with the Vietnam era here. Not the US going to get a blo*odied nose (though it is doing at present) but the REAL war being the war against an ideology being fought in other peoples countries. In the past the ideology was communism. This time it’s Islam.

For my part I would much rather deal with communism as even if the communists did win eventually it would peter out and capitalism would creep back in, it’s human nature.

Not so with islam. If THAT ideology gets the upper hand then the world is in very serious trouble indeed.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0