“Fuel and Planes Alone Did NOT Bring the Tower

The Bear · 05-03-2008, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighlandFP

You had better tell that to these people.

120+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
330+ Engineers and Architects
80+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
210+ Professors Question 9/11
200+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
130+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

Why?

If they can't or won't accept reality then sod 'em.

mkpdavies · 05-03-2008, 08:17 AM

I'm not sure who I pitty the most.

People who blindly accept what websites tell them is true and won't accept the possibility that something else may have happened.

Or people who blindly accept what their government tells them is true and won't accept the possibility that something else may have happened.

Open minds seem to be a thing of the past.

The Bear · 05-03-2008, 08:28 AM

How aboiut those who weigh up what they've watched happen on TV and what is most sensible and what fits with a pattern.

Don't forget that Osama bin liner had a go at the WTC in the past, don't foprget all the other Muslim attacks on US assets, don't forget all the threats about "striking at the US" form various "little sheet heads" (mustn't call them towels, they're little sheets!) that have taken place and continue to do so.

mkpdavies · 05-03-2008, 08:35 AM

Quote:

weigh up what they've watched happen on TV

Said without a hint of irony.

YouTube - Network

Ea of Dune · 05-03-2008, 02:48 PM

What about the fact that the member of Pakistani Intel who sent the hijackers several thousand dollars was having breakfast in the Whitehouse around 9/11 (probably why the 9/11 report said that the source of funding for the terrorists was inconsiquential).
I'd be having words with that man!

Ea of dune

youcanhandlethetruth · 05-03-2008, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ea of Dune

What about the fact that the member of Pakistani Intel who sent the hijackers several thousand dollars was having breakfast in the Whitehouse around 9/11 (probably why the 9/11 report said that the source of funding for the terrorists was inconsiquential).
I'd be having words with that man!

Ea of dune

Another good point Ee of dune.

You see there's so much evidence, I forget to even mention half of it.

The Bear · 05-03-2008, 03:59 PM

I would imagine that the Pakistani intel orginisation is pretty damm big and so is it impossible that one person from one part knew or was in any way associated with another part who ARE supporting muslim terrorism should have been attending a breakfast meeting?

The real cause is plain. Islamic terrorism.

youcanhandlethetruth · 05-03-2008, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

I'm not sure who I pitty the most.

People who blindly accept what websites tell them is true and won't accept the possibility that something else may have happened.

Or people who blindly accept what their government tells them is true and won't accept the possibility that something else may have happened.

Open minds seem to be a thing of the past.

What websites are you referring to mkp ?

pilotsfor911truth ? scholarsfor911truth ?

Are you putting these into a "conspiracy" category ?

Whatever your thoughts, have a look at the thread again and Bear's comment when he says words to the effect of "these websites are rubbish".

Ironically the website that I misread was the BBC's !

Now I'm sure you know my general opinion on maninstream media, but the point is, that Bear latches onto one mistake I made as a justification to throw out the rest which he objects to and has probably never read.

I'm sorry I'm only human and am not perfect to never make an error but please don't pity me or any of the websites you don't trust.

In my opinion the scientific analysis of experts shouldn't be thrown out because people misunderstand one area of confusion - I'm sorry but I think it's being totally ridiculous.

TannyD · 05-03-2008, 04:23 PM

So is this discussion over then?

mkpdavies · 05-03-2008, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth

What websites are you referring to mkp ?

pilotsfor911truth ? scholarsfor911truth ?

Are you putting these into a "conspiracy" category ?

Whatever your thoughts, have a look at the thread again and Bear's comment when he says words to the effect of "these websites are rubbish".

Ironically the website that I misread was the BBC's !

Now I'm sure you know my general opinion on maninstream media, but the point is, that Bear latches onto one mistake I made as a justification to throw out the rest which he objects to and has probably never read.

I'm sorry I'm only human and am not perfect to never make an error but please don't pity me or any of the websites you don't trust.

In my opinion the scientific analysis of experts shouldn't be thrown out because people misunderstand one area of confusion - I'm sorry but I think it's being totally ridiculous.

You're getting waaaay to defensive over your beliefs (which you are entitled to). It borders on religious fervour sometimes and scares people off.

I'm with you on many issues, but you can't scream at people because they don't share your conclusions. I don't blame you for getting wound up at the zombie like acceptance of "official" news that some seem to do, but you have to accept that the Alex Jones of this world don't have all the answers either.

05-03-2008, 08:17 AM	#62 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,080 Party: Libertarian Party	I'm not sure who I pitty the most. People who blindly accept what websites tell them is true and won't accept the possibility that something else may have happened. Or people who blindly accept what their government tells them is true and won't accept the possibility that something else may have happened. Open minds seem to be a thing of the past. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

05-03-2008, 02:48 PM	#65 (permalink)
Ea of Dune Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Hell Posts: 1,049	Intel What about the fact that the member of Pakistani Intel who sent the hijackers several thousand dollars was having breakfast in the Whitehouse around 9/11 (probably why the 9/11 report said that the source of funding for the terrorists was inconsiquential). I'd be having words with that man! Ea of dune

05-03-2008, 04:23 PM	#69 (permalink)
TannyD Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Cafe Rene. :D Posts: 837	So is this discussion over then? __________________ Ignore/Avoid List: youcanhandlethetruth.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-03-2008, 08:28 AM	#63 (permalink)
The Bear Uber Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: East Anglia Posts: 2,178	How aboiut those who weigh up what they've watched happen on TV and what is most sensible and what fits with a pattern. Don't forget that Osama bin liner had a go at the WTC in the past, don't foprget all the other Muslim attacks on US assets, don't forget all the threats about "striking at the US" form various "little sheet heads" (mustn't call them towels, they're little sheets!) that have taken place and continue to do so.

05-03-2008, 03:59 PM	#67 (permalink)
The Bear Uber Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: East Anglia Posts: 2,178	I would imagine that the Pakistani intel orginisation is pretty damm big and so is it impossible that one person from one part knew or was in any way associated with another part who ARE supporting muslim terrorism should have been attending a breakfast meeting? The real cause is plain. Islamic terrorism.