British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > International Politics


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2008, 02:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,438
22ANDUK is just starting out
Default Freedom of Speech Banned For British Athletes in Chinese Olympics

British Olympic chiefs are to force athletes to sign a contract promising not to speak out about China's appalling human rights record – or face being banned from travelling to Beijing. The move – which raises the spectre of the order given to the England football team to give a Nazi salute in Berlin in 1938 – immediately provoked a storm of protest.

Britain kow tows to China as athletes are forced to sign no criticism contracts | the Daily Mail

It is contained in a 32-page document that will be presented to all those who reach the qualifying standard and are chosen for the team. From the moment they sign up, the competitors – likely to include the Queen's granddaughter Zara Phillips and world record holder Paula Radcliffe – will be effectively gagged from commenting on China's politics, human rights abuses or illegal occupation of Tibet.

Where's the Human Rights Act in all this? Surely this is a breach of 'Human Rights' in preventing someone from having 'Freedom of Speech'.

Or is this a case as always as 'as and when it suits'?
22ANDUK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 10-02-2008, 02:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 31,083
Party: Libertarian Party
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

I won't be watching or supporting that Olympics then.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 04:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
rjt
Uber Member
 
rjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 5,479
rjt is just starting out
Default

The Chinese Government is totally appaling, I am anoyed as hell that we negoiate trade deals with regimes like that and then let murderous thugs like Mugabe get off. Its time this governement actually brought in an ethical foreign policy instead of talking about one.

I also will not be watching.
__________________
Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO!
(Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990)

Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.
rjt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 05:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
steve fowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,201
Party: UKIP
steve fowler is just starting out
Default

the sports player should refuse to go to the games or China if they can not speak their minds but then again i think Labour wants to turn our country into their own version of china?.
__________________
RULE BRITANNIA BRITANNIA RULES THE WAVES, BRITONS NEVER EVER SHALL BE SLAVE'S.

Never give in - never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.
Winston Churchill.

When Labour won the 1997 General Election, Enoch Powell told his wife that the electorate had voted to break up the United Kingdom.
steve fowler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 05:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,974
Aardvark has some supporters
Default

Human Rights Act ss12 and 13 - only apples in UK and only applies to the extent the courts must take notice.
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008
Aardvark is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 06:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 587
Phil Sheldon is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aardvark View Post
Human Rights Act ss12 and 13 - only apples in UK and only applies to the extent the courts must take notice.
Article 10 would seem to contradict your post.Freedom of expression is enshrined in this section and I would argue that HMG is contravening the HRA and should be told quite firmly to go hell.

Article 10 – Freedom of expression

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
2.The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

Athletes should consider whether or not their loyalties are to their chosen sports or to the State.
__________________
Those who would sacrifice Freedom
for Safety
deserve neither.
Phil Sheldon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 08:01 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,974
Aardvark has some supporters
Default

Phil, Article 10 doesn't contradict my post. Why when citing the ECHR do people always post the second paragraph, which lays down limits on most of the rights, without asking what is meant? The 'protection of the reputation or rights of others' might mean the right of others to compete in the Olympics without some political prima donna screwing it up for them.

It is the British Olympian Association, the sport's governing body, not HMG that is asking athletes to sign the contract. They may well be a public authority, but we are talking here of a country, China, that is not in Europe and is not subject to the ECHR (although the UN has a Universal Declaration of Human Rights).

The ECHR was agreed in 1950, although it had been adopted earlier by some countries, but does not bind anybody. Most signatories have given some of it the force of law, but we left it until 1998 to pass the Human Rights Act which I cited.

If the BOA has issued a contract that they say abides by Section 51 of the International Olympic Committee charter, which “provides for no kind of demonstration, or political, religious or racial propaganda in the Olympic sites, venues or other areas” then so be it.

I think it is a bit extreme, but we have to be careful that we don't allow the Olympics to be used as a political football as Hitler did, as the Black Power guys did in Mexico and as people did over Afghanistan. It is supposed to be about the athletes getting together to compete free from the politics of the world. I hate Communism and I think the Chinese state apparatus is terrible, but the whole point of the games is to exclude that for a few weeks.

What will happen if people start screwing up the London Olympics to make their political points?
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008
Aardvark is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2008, 04:25 PM   #8 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
g hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erewhon
Posts: 5,595
g hall has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
I won't be watching or supporting that Olympics then.
Or the games due to be held in London either
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."
Remember TANSTAAFL and
TANJ


g hall is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0