Millennium3

I don't think those behind a NWO - bankers, owners of giant corporations etc are socialists - these are extremely powerful individuals who want to become even more powerful through opening up every market in the world to their products and services. By doing so they are able to take out those providing these products and services in the 'opened up' countries through economies of scale. It why there is not a British car industry - along with many others. Consumers get more for their money, but at a cost. These people get to become [or close to] global monopolies.

For_England

The explanation appears to be dialectical - see Perestroika Deception
and
Why Karl Marx Supported Libertarianism

Add to this the works of men like Anthony Sutton, who demonstrated that Communism was financed by Wall Street, and I believe things begin to make a little more sense.

youcanhandlethetruth

I would say most events are planned. Once you read between the lines or more accurately just scour the internet for real facts - you start to understand the enormity of the world we live in.
I have to say Tanny - if you want the truth, best to watch Alex Jones' films but also to listen to understand the background - the more you listen the more you'll understand that it's staring us right in the face.
We just don't want to see it.....

Millennium3

I suspect both capitalists and communists would like world domination. However, looking from a British point of view, it seems that the capitalists have been improving their position here. One feature is the move towards reducing government provided services so that they can be provided by the private sector.

Personally I would prefer to see health services [including dental] for instance, to be provide by the state. These areas are better motivated by a degree of altruism rather than pure profit - although that is presently a very unfashionable view.

Hunter

Common Purpose should be added to the list, either as part of the NWO or allied to it's goal.

Ea of Dune

I see the whole PFI/Private sector line of things in my area of work. I certainly don't think it's the right approach. It's all about who can make the most amount of money and that means cutting corners, lazyness under researched projects etc.
What annoys me is you tend to see the big companies land the contracts and they have a consortium of smaller firms who the pass the work onto.
This then spreads the blame. The big company can also flex it's muscle and screw over the smaller company to get things done (which can have the negative effect of putting them (the small firm) out of business).
Of course when the project is finished, the credit will go to the big firm. If the project is a flop, then the smaller firms become the scape goat, as the big firms just shurg of the failure and then use the same old people in places to get another contract.
Bit ***** really!

Ea of dune

Millennium3

As a means to the end.