+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 55

Thread: Was Enoch Powell wrong?

  1. #11
    Senior Member Gill has some supporters Gill's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    North East
    Posts
    1,517

    Quote Originally Posted by Quetelet View Post
    .........AND racist fectards like you lot
    What a smart thing to say.

    I would rather be what you call a racist than a brainwashed enemy of the British.

    Correct me if im wrong but wasn't plaid cymru nazi collaborators?

    Off topic but ive noticed these so called leftist's who came to "tackle the Bnp" are really a poor excuse for humans.

    Enoch Powell was right and the only reason the left hurl so much abuse at this guy is because their to stupid to know he was the last true English politician.
    Last edited by Gill; 26-11-2009 at 12:55 PM.
    British By Birth... English By The Grace Of God.

  2. #12
    Junior Member andyrich66 is just starting out
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    50

    We have to be careful when discussing Powell.
    He did not oppose all immigration in fact as Health Secretary he oversaw an influx
    of migrants to work in the N.H.S. Powell was a highly educated man not a racist bigot.
    He believed in equality before the law, that families should be kept together
    and that any re-patriation policy should be purely voluntary.
    Hi was disgusted at the failure of the political elite think through the possible long term consequences of their actions.
    Transcripts of Powell's 1968 Birmingham speech are easily found in the Internet.
    Many people who comment on the speech have never actually read it properly and
    base their opinions on charactures created by journalists looking for sensational
    headlines.
    His basic argument, as I understand it, was that if levels of immigration were too high
    (as he believed) then parts of the country would be changed beyond recognition and society would be unable to integrate the new arrivals.
    He warned of a growth in "vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences" - The example he used were Sikhs who happened to be in the news at time but you could easily substitue the reference with a more modern one to Islam.
    His point (and that of John Stonehouse who he quoted), was that if you allow immigrant communities to maintain customs and practices inappropriate to this country you will end up with a society that is dangerously divided.
    Looking around after years of being told to celebrate "diversity" it's hard to deny that he had a point.

  3. #13
    Uber Member Charlemagne should really think about leaving Charlemagne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4,039

    Quote Originally Posted by andyrich66 View Post
    His point (and that of John Stonehouse who he quoted), was that if you allow immigrant communities to maintain customs and practices inappropriate to this country you will end up with a society that is dangerously divided.
    Looking around after years of being told to celebrate "diversity" it's hard to deny that he had a point.
    Anti-immigrant bashing is hardly new. Hitler and Goebbels used it to much greater effect than Powell yet no one hails them as genius visionaries.

    Wonder why?
    low grade UAF operative

  4. #14
    Senior Member Gill has some supporters Gill's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    North East
    Posts
    1,517

    Quote Originally Posted by andyrich66 View Post
    We have to be careful when discussing Powell.
    He did not oppose all immigration in fact as Health Secretary he oversaw an influx
    of migrants to work in the N.H.S. Powell was a highly educated man not a racist bigot.
    He believed in equality before the law, that families should be kept together
    and that any re-patriation policy should be purely voluntary.
    Hi was disgusted at the failure of the political elite think through the possible long term consequences of their actions.
    Transcripts of Powell's 1968 Birmingham speech are easily found in the Internet.
    Many people who comment on the speech have never actually read it properly and
    base their opinions on charactures created by journalists looking for sensational
    headlines.
    His basic argument, as I understand it, was that if levels of immigration were too high
    (as he believed) then parts of the country would be changed beyond recognition and society would be unable to integrate the new arrivals.
    He warned of a growth in "vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences" - The example he used were Sikhs who happened to be in the news at time but you could easily substitue the reference with a more modern one to Islam.
    His point (and that of John Stonehouse who he quoted), was that if you allow immigrant communities to maintain customs and practices inappropriate to this country you will end up with a society that is dangerously divided.
    Looking around after years of being told to celebrate "diversity" it's hard to deny that he had a point.
    This is why i don't take leftist smears to heart because we all know Enoch Powell was a great man and for our leftist friends to call him a racist shows the lack of foresight. To think Enoch Powell was a racist just means they have "Watched" Rivers of blood and has been told to hate it.
    Last edited by Gill; 26-11-2009 at 01:13 PM.
    British By Birth... English By The Grace Of God.

  5. #15
    Junior Member andyrich66 is just starting out
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    50

    Quote Originally Posted by Charlemagne View Post
    Anti-immigrant bashing is hardly new. Hitler and Goebbels used it to much greater effect than Powell yet no one hails them as genius visionaries.

    Wonder why?
    Comparisons with Hitler are facile.
    The Nazis stood for legalised in-equality, forced repatriation and of course murder. Powell opposed all of this and fought against it as a soldier.
    It's not a question of "bashing" anyone and even the likes of Trevor Phillips can see we have problem.
    If you have groups of people living in the same country who have very different views of their identity and don't share cultural ideas that are at
    least compatible then you have the potential for trouble.
    Powell could see this and was prepared to put his head over the parapet to
    say so.
    The question now is how do we deal with the tension before it's too late?
    We won't achieve anything by sticking our heads in the sand and pretending
    that everything is ok.

  6. #16
    Uber Member Charlemagne should really think about leaving Charlemagne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4,039

    Quote Originally Posted by andyrich66 View Post
    Comparisons with Hitler are facile.
    The Nazis stood for legalised in-equality, forced repatriation and of course murder.
    They also stood for anti-political correctness, the abolition of multi-culturalism, the preservation of the traditional German way of life, and German jobs for German people.

    They also warned us about the dangers of immigration way before Powell jumped on the bandwagon.
    Last edited by Charlemagne; 26-11-2009 at 03:29 PM.
    low grade UAF operative

  7. #17
    Gardening Leave British-Conservatism has some supporters
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    11,950

    Quote Originally Posted by Charlemagne View Post
    They also stood for anti-political correctness, the abolition of multi-culturalism, the preservation of the traditional German way of life, and German jobs for German people.

    They also warned us about the dangers of immigration way before Powell jumped on the bandwagon.
    The Conservative party and Labour party of the time also supported these things.
    Are they Nazis too?

  8. #18
    Uber Member Charlemagne should really think about leaving Charlemagne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4,039

    Quote Originally Posted by British-Conservatism View Post
    The Conservative party and Labour party of the time also supported these things.
    Are they Nazis too?
    They were nowhere near as tough on immigration as the Nazis.

    That's why the reputation of soft-touch Britain is so well known.
    Last edited by Charlemagne; 26-11-2009 at 03:38 PM.
    low grade UAF operative

  9. #19
    Gardening Leave British-Conservatism has some supporters
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    11,950

    Quote Originally Posted by Charlemagne View Post
    They were nowhere near as tough on immigration as the Nazis.

    That's why this country became known as soft-touch Britain.
    If you regard toughness as extermination then of course.

  10. #20
    Uber Member Charlemagne should really think about leaving Charlemagne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4,039

    Quote Originally Posted by British-Conservatism View Post
    If you regard toughness as extermination then of course.
    Tell me. Would you have rather lived in Nazi Germany during its glorious heyday than in the 21st century multi-cultural cesspit that is Britain today?
    low grade UAF operative

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts