Multiculturalists' selective attitude - Page 2

John Connor · 22-04-2008, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighlandFP

The colour of Islam is Green.

I always figured that islam was jealous of the west. Thanks for admitting it.

British-Conservatism · 22-04-2008, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bear

I find it utterly amazing that what DJ said could be interpreted in any way as supporting multiculturalism.

We ARE a mongrel nation and that is an inescapable fact. Most countries are.

Of course we have a British nationality and a British mindset and British morality as a basis for much that we do, but as with any nation both mindset and morality change with time.

Except in the case of those nations where Islam has clamped its cold grey hand of stultification.

The British culture that remains, and goodness knows there’s not much after fifty years plus of our kids being indoctrinated by the teaching Guardianistra in our schools, is a different one from that of fifty years ago.

All that means is that now it’s 1050 years old rather than 1000 years.

It's called progress.

.

Only 1% of British Whites have non-White DNA hardly mongrels.

British-Conservatism · 22-04-2008, 05:57 PM

[quote=g hall;490250]Perhaps you should take a look at the maps of the British Empire and bear in mind that many third world types who you cheerfully denigrate fought and died for the Empire.
As a consequence of Empire many of these people aspired to the British way of life.
All this has been lost by the morons in the PC Islingtonia brigade and the attitudes of the "Little Englanders" (not all of whom are English)[/QUOTE

Perhaps you should look up how many Africans, Indians and Muslims fought for the Fascists, Germans and Japanese in both world wars.

g hall · 22-04-2008, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Not a fraction of the number of Britons who died to save these 'third world types' from Nazi enslavement.

Just plain wrong

for example the UK lost 450,400 in WW2 and India 1,587,000
link here World War II casualties - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:

Conscription didn't apply to 'third world types', but I'm sure you knew that, didn't you?

But India's Volunteer army comprised at the end of WW2 2.5 million volunteers, but I'm sure you knew that

Quote:

Generous Britain gave them independence and, whaddya know, they came here instead.

Up until recently many came to do jobs that the indigenous population wouldn't do
Many also choose to be educated here because as I said they aspired to all things British - I have no idea why they would do that now given how poor the education system is

Quote:

Before you get on your high horse with your multicultural crock of cr*p let me tell you that my father, who served in two world wars, and was wounded in the first agreed 100% with what I am saying now.

I never said anything about multiculturalism which you appear to have some fixation about which appears to explain your own shortcomings as a human being
As regards your father the seed doesn't fall far from the tree does it

Quote:

If there's one thing I can't abide it's people dressing up leftism as patriotism.

I'm NOT a leftie and as regards patriotism that is the last refuge of a scoundrel - which you appear to be

g hall · 22-04-2008, 06:27 PM

[quote=British-Conservatism;490678]

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

Perhaps you should take a look at the maps of the British Empire and bear in mind that many third world types who you cheerfully denigrate fought and died for the Empire.
As a consequence of Empire many of these people aspired to the British way of life.
All this has been lost by the morons in the PC Islingtonia brigade and the attitudes of the "Little Englanders" (not all of whom are English)[/QUOTE

Perhaps you should look up how many Africans, Indians and Muslims fought for the Fascists, Germans and Japanese in both world wars.

And some white British fought for the SS so what's your point
Jog on zebedee

g hall · 22-04-2008, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by British-Conservatism

Only 1% of British Whites have non-White DNA hardly mongrels.

Cite your proof please

g hall · 22-04-2008, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bear

It’s a lovely morning down here in Norfolk, the crops are well on the way and the first of the Oil Seed is already turning some of the fields golden, with the flowering cherries in peoples gardens, our included, mostly now in full bloom.

What a shame they stay in flower for such a short time but then how wonderful they look against the backdrop of spring bursting out everywhere.

And the hay fever medicines are flying off the shelves

Robin · 22-04-2008, 07:19 PM

In both worl wars Britain was aided by citizens of the Empire and Commonwealth.
We have a duty to these people first. The EU comes someway after.

British-Conservatism · 22-04-2008, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g hall

Cite your proof please

Professor Bryan Sykes at Oxford tested 10,000 White Britons and found only 1% had DNA of other races.
In his book the Blood of the Isles it all so shows that 70% of our genetic make up comes from the post glacial hunter gatherers who settled this country.
I know I have no non-white DNA do you?

British-Conservatism · 22-04-2008, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robin

In both worl wars Britain was aided by citizens of the Empire and Commonwealth.
We have a duty to these people first. The EU comes someway after.

Tens of thousands of Indians fought for the Nazis and Japs in the Indian National Army.
There were 45,000 Indian troops from Malaya captured and assembled in Singapore when the Japanese captured it. Of these, about 5,000 refused to join the First INA. The INA at this time had 40,000 recruits. The Japanese were prepared to arm 16,000. When the "first INA" collapsed, about 4,000 withdrew. The Second INA, commanded by Subhash Chandra Bose, started with 12,000 troops. Further recruitment of ex-Indian army personnel added about 8,000-10,000. About 18,000 Indian civilians enlisted during this time. In 1945, at the end of the INA, it consisted of about 40,000 soldiers.

Loyal fellows these colonial merceneries arnt they!

Thats before we even mention the fact that more Black troops fought for the Fascists than fought for Britain in the war.

22-04-2008, 05:57 PM	#13 (permalink)
British-Conservatism Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 522	[quote=g hall;490250]Perhaps you should take a look at the maps of the British Empire and bear in mind that many third world types who you cheerfully denigrate fought and died for the Empire. As a consequence of Empire many of these people aspired to the British way of life. All this has been lost by the morons in the PC Islingtonia brigade and the attitudes of the "Little Englanders" (not all of whom are English)[/QUOTE Perhaps you should look up how many Africans, Indians and Muslims fought for the Fascists, Germans and Japanese in both world wars. __________________ http://conservativedemocraticalliance.blogspot.com/

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

22-04-2008, 07:19 PM	#18 (permalink)
Robin Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 749	In both worl wars Britain was aided by citizens of the Empire and Commonwealth. We have a duty to these people first. The EU comes someway after.