Mass immigration is destroying Britain

Tara · 02-04-2008, 10:05 AM

Daily Express: The World's Greatest Newspaper :: Columnists :: Brown can fool no one now, mass immigration IS destroying Britain

Quote:

DURING the past decade Britain has been through a social revolution.

The fabric of our country has been transformed by waves of uncontrolled immigration. Many parts of our towns and cities now feel like foreign lands, awash with alien cultures and languages.

There has been a growing sense of alarm at the consequences of this change. Our sense of national identity and Britishness has been eroded. Social cohesion has been shattered, replaced by mutual suspicion.

Public services, particularly the NHS, housing and education are almost at breaking point, barely able to cope with the growing demand from migrants.

Our once well-ordered civilisation is scarred by Third World practices like gangland violence, corruption, tribalism and the exploitation of women and children.

Yet, even in the face of mounting public anger, the Government has tried to justify mass immigration on the grounds of its supposed economic benefits to Britain.

Ministers have claimed that the import of vast armies of foreigners has been necessary to boost output and tackle labour shortages. According to their propaganda, immigration has raised our GDP and contributed an annual £6billion to the Treasury.

Now these arguments have been demolished by an authoritative independent inquiry. In a brutal report published
yesterday, the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee took apart the Government’s case – immigration has brought no real economic gain and has done nothing to reduce job vacancies.

Indeed, far from improving matters, mass immigration has pushed up unemployment in the indigenous population and has driven down wages, as well as heighten the strain on the housing market and public services.

The Lords report is an impressive work, the result of a long, impartial investigation into the realities of mass
migration. And it cannot be dismissed as partisan for the 16-strong Economic Affairs Committee is drawn from the three main parties.

Indeed, one of the most outspoken critics was Lord Layard: Labour peer, economist and former adviser to Tony Blair.

Despite the evidence the Government is still clinging to its discredited ideology but no one is going to be fooled
by Mr Brown and his acolytes any longer.

In truth, the economic justification for migration has always been a lot of nonsense. Contrary to the Government’s claims, the cost has been huge. With a possible 700,000 foreigners arriving here every year the bill paid by the taxpayer could be as high as £29billion.

The argument about migrants filling vacancies, wheeled out again yesterday by the Home Office Minister Liam Byrne, has been equally fallacious. The rate of vacancies remains just as high as it was before our borders were abolished and we have five million people of working age who are living on benefits.

It is the economics of the madhouse to import millions of foreigners while paying a large swathe of the indigenous population to remain out of work.

And the idea that all migrants are hard-working is just another myth. In fact, rates of unemployment among Somalians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are far higher than in the British population.

Even if there were some small economic gains from immigration they could not possibly compensate for the destruction of our neighbourhoods or the growth in violent crime, or the removal of any spirit of unity.

Where the political elite sees “multi-cultural diversity” to be celebrated, we only see mayhem – such as the extra*ordinary squalor of “Tent City” in Peterborough, home to hundreds of Eastern Europeans.

Yet for all the puffing from Mr Brown and Mr Byrne yesterday, the reality is that Labour’s Government never genuinely believed in its economic claims for migration.

Hollow talk about rising living standards and GDP has only been a cover to disguise Labour’s real motivation.

One purpose behind mass migration was the cynical goal of boosting Labour’s vote, recognising that new arrivals and ethnic minorities are far more likely to support Labour than other parties.

The introduction of postal voting and the distribution of grants to self-styled “community groups” have been further moves to strengthen Labour’s client base in migrant areas. In practice mass migration has been an instrument for anti-democratic gerrymandering.

Yet there is also a deeper, more sinister impulse at work, for the higher echelons of the Labour Party have long been gripped by a sense of loathing for their own country.

When the likes of Harriet Harman or Margaret Hodge see the Union flag or hear the National Anthem they are not stirred by the natural patriotism that inspires most of us. Instead they feel only contempt for any manifestation
of Britishness.

So they have used immigration as a weapon against British values and symbols. Every institution must embrace diversity, every service must be geared towards the needs of migrants.

In this climate of ruthlessly enforced multi-culturalism, where national self-hatred is dressed up as anti-racism, patriotism is turned into a thought-crime.

Labour’s economic arguments may have been exposed as absurd but the party’s secret project to revolutionise Britain has been all too tragically successful.

A once great nation is being ruined by its own Government.

ranter · 02-04-2008, 11:23 AM

Yes it would appear the Labour Plan has succeeded.The question now is can it be reversed? And by who?

Tara · 02-04-2008, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ranter

Yes it would appear the Labour Plan has succeeded.The question now is can it be reversed? And by who?

Well, it's not going to be reversed by UKIP, all they propose is a 5 year halt on immigration which on the surface is great but it's repatriations we need, without that the indigenous population face future extinction. Those of us without our heads in the sand living in large towns and cities know what's going on and know what people in rural areas have to look forward to.

Have you read that Labour have planned to get rid of the Lords? After what the Lords have said on immigration this week their days are definitely numbered, at the moment they are our only saviour against our biggest enemy, the Marxists.

John Connor · 02-04-2008, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ranter

Yes it would appear the Labour Plan has succeeded.The question now is can it be reversed?

No, it can't. Get yourself a passport and a one-way ticket to anywhere but here.

Seasider · 02-04-2008, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Connor

No, it can't. Get yourself a passport and a one-way ticket to anywhere but here.

How many people do you think our little tiny island is capable of holding?

Either comfortably or uncomfortably?

TannyD · 02-04-2008, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tara

Well, it's not going to be reversed by UKIP, all they propose is a 5 year halt on immigration which on the surface is great but it's repatriations we need, without that the indigenous population face future extinction. Those of us without our heads in the sand living in large towns and cities know what's going on and know what people in rural areas have to look forward to.

Have you read that Labour have planned to get rid of the Lords? After what the Lords have said on immigration this week their days are definitely numbered, at the moment they are our only saviour against our biggest enemy, the Marxists.

Rome wasn't built in a day, progress is probably best achieved gradually with small steps.

John Connor · 02-04-2008, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seasider

How many people do you think our little tiny island is capable of holding?

About 20-30m. We can't feed ourselves much beyond that.

Seasider · 02-04-2008, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Connor

About 20-30m. We can't feed ourselves much beyond that.

I understand we now have a population of 60 million give or take.

Just to compare...Australia's is of the order of 20 million, and before any one points out I am aware that large tracts of Australia are uninhabitable.

Tara · 02-04-2008, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TannyD

Rome wasn't built in a day, progress is probably best achieved gradually with small steps.

Yes but I didn't say I wanted to kick all the immigrants out in one go, say over a three month period, no, that would be too harsh. I'd round them up over a period of a year and deport the lot of them, like you say, Rome wasn't built in a day. See, I can be liberal when I want to be.

Northumbrian · 02-04-2008, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seasider

I understand we now have a population of 60 million give or take.

Just to compare...Australia's is of the order of 20 million, and before any one points out I am aware that large tracts of Australia are uninhabitable.

A more telling comparison is New Zealand. Slightly bigger than the UK, but with a population of 4 million.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-04-2008, 11:23 AM	#2 (permalink)
ranter Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: in a parralell universe Posts: 806	Yes it would appear the Labour Plan has succeeded.The question now is can it be reversed? And by who?