Originally Posted by British-Conservatism

What being black in Britain is far more likely to indicate is the probability that a person will be from a socially deprived background and have suffered prejudice, bigotry, disadvantage, and lack of opportunity

Really we that just does not add up.
The British Crime Survey, published in 1998, estimates that in 1995, 382,000 offences were racially motivated. Of these, 143,000 were committed against members of ethnic minorities, and 238,000 against white people.
if the ethnic minorities comprise 6% of the population of the UK (as of 1998), and are producing 238,000 racial assaults per year, and the white population, who comprise 94% of the population, are producing 143,000 racial assaults per year, it would appear that, on a per capita basis, the ethnic minorities are producing about 25 times more racial assaults than the white population. In fact, this clearly underestimates the discrepancy, since some of the racial assaults against blacks will have been committed by Asians, and some (I would guess a lot) of the assaults on Asians will have been committed by blacks.
Then we could mention how much more opportunity Blacks have too with the vast array of organisations that support Blacks on jobs and placements that are reserved for Ethnic Minorities.

Originally Posted by British-Conservatism

I can quote Watson directly if you like.

Originally Posted by The Bear

One point to start with. 1995 was thirteen years ago. Today we are not only years down the line and in the next century, wer are in the next millennium!

Next, the word “estimates”. Then ”White people”.

White people includes Jews, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, French, etc etc.

It also does NOT mean that every “racially motivated crime” was a black on white crime.

Tell you what. Let’s deal with the latest released figures, the 2004 / 5 reports.

Quote

The 2004/05 British Crime Survey (BCS) shows that people from mixed ethnic groups face significantly higher risks of being a victim of crime than White people. However, there were no other statistically significant differences between people from different ethnic backgrounds.

The 2004/05 BCS shows that people in BME groups were significantly more likely than White people to be worried about burglary, car crime and violent crime.

Why not read and try to understand the contents of http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdf...erview0405.pdf and then rather than cut and past from racist filth web sites come up with your own analysis of the data and the information you glean from it.

You may even learn something in the process.

Originally Posted by The Bear

Do so by all means. I will then explain it to you.

Originally Posted by david H

Bear's post at 22 is a hundred years out of date. Must be a follower of Seebohm Rowntree!

Originally Posted by British-Conservatism

Now how about you answer the question.

Why do Blacks commit so much more crime than Whites when this country has far more deprived Whites?

Why do Chinese and Indian immigrants commit far less crime than Blacks?

Originally Posted by BonnieDundee

BC are you suggesting that there is something inherent in blacks, biologically speaking, that causes this? Because it might be news to you but the idea of different "races" is generally dismissed by geneticists these dats with as much similarites between a white and black and a black and a black on average.

Also such a view that black's are biology more likely to engage in negative behaviours is the very essence of rascism. Not that you are necessarily of this view, I can't tell.