British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > Immigration


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2008, 07:46 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
HighlandFP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ross-shire Highlands SCOTLAND
Posts: 586
Party: Other
HighlandFP is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

When, last year I was Homeless and visiting the Coooncil Offices,
a polish couple were filling in their Votres Role papers.
I who have stood in many many elections,
DIDNT have a vote as I was Homeless.

Funny ol' world.
__________________
WARNING: By reading or downloading this post you may be committing an offence under some or all of these Terrorism Acts.
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/securit...m-and-the-law/

EU = Ein Volk ~ Ein Reich.
HighlandFP is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 04-03-2008, 10:29 AM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,178
The Bear is just starting out
Default

I’ve long held the opinion that there should be a more substantial qualification to vote in the UK than there is.

The principle that the unemployed can have a say in who governs the nation is frankly absurd. Something about “no representation without taxation” should be a starting point for reform.

So is the thought that someone should have a say who has not born in the UK and anyone else who has not demonstrated in some formal way that they are numerate and literate and able to understand what the main parties promote.

As for immigration, if any government of the day were to bite the bullet and crack down, and I mean BIG TIME on the “don’t work – won’t work” lot, as well as the women who see getting “knocked up” as a free ticket to a house and a life on “benefits” which so many now do as a career choice, then there would not be vacancies that immigrants could fill.

No vacancies in the private sector? No option but basic social security payments? Fine, but then they should work in the community to earn those Social Security payments.

Just as “no representation without taxation” should apply so “no payments without working for them” should be in place. It’s farcical that we let the idle swine sit around and get tax payers money for doing nothing.

But of course no government would go down such a road.

They just know that such a policy would guarantee them being booted out come the next election as the social slobs used their undeserved votes.

No, good luck to the Poles and others who come here to do the jobs the Brits are too bone idle to do, and good luck to them for having a say in who rules the country in which they are working and paying taxes.

And a plague on the idle slobs who just ponce off the rest of us and continue to have a say in how WE have to live.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 02:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,044
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
I’ve long held the opinion that there should be a more substantial qualification to vote in the UK than there is.

The principle that the unemployed can have a say in who governs the nation is frankly absurd. Something about “no representation without taxation” should be a starting point for reform.

So is the thought that someone should have a say who has not born in the UK and anyone else who has not demonstrated in some formal way that they are numerate and literate and able to understand what the main parties promote.

As for immigration, if any government of the day were to bite the bullet and crack down, and I mean BIG TIME on the “don’t work – won’t work” lot, as well as the women who see getting “knocked up” as a free ticket to a house and a life on “benefits” which so many now do as a career choice, then there would not be vacancies that immigrants could fill.

No vacancies in the private sector? No option but basic social security payments? Fine, but then they should work in the community to earn those Social Security payments.

Just as “no representation without taxation” should apply so “no payments without working for them” should be in place. It’s farcical that we let the idle swine sit around and get tax payers money for doing nothing.

But of course no government would go down such a road.

They just know that such a policy would guarantee them being booted out come the next election as the social slobs used their undeserved votes.

No, good luck to the Poles and others who come here to do the jobs the Brits are too bone idle to do, and good luck to them for having a say in who rules the country in which they are working and paying taxes.

And a plague on the idle slobs who just ponce off the rest of us and continue to have a say in how WE have to live.
No wonder the country is going down the toilet if people listen to pro-government views like yours...

In typical New Labour fashion, you've turned round the burden the taxpayer has to endure by supporting immigration into an attack on those who are the most affected by immigration and the problems it creates.

Most people would say it is the immigrants who are sponging off the state getting handouts, and causing employment problems yet you totally support them.

Your statement "there would not be vacancies that immigrants could fill"
The government are purposefully creating the employment problem, not the unemployed.
Passing the buck again onto the most vulnerable - typical pro-government tactic....

Even if we are to agree with you and your ridiculous suggestion "anyone else who has not demonstrated in some formal way that they are numerate and literate and able to understand what the main parties promote." how much is that going to cost the taxpayer in organizing ?!!!

Are you suggesting:
People have to pass GCSE maths in order to vote ?
People need to take a "main political parties" test ? [Note also no mention is made of smaller political parties that represent Britains interests a lot more]

In fact, you're probably contradicting yourself in part by saying people should be able literate, numerate and know about main political parties(!) but also saying "good luck to the Poles for having a say in who rules the country"

How many Poles will have all the criteria you state they should have in order to vote ? How many of them can even speak fluent English to the standard you wish ?
Not very many I imagine.......

You're trying to re-write the voting process in an unthinkable and totally c*ck handed way - it's no more than typical pro-EU Labour policy and rhetoric.

And you despise the unemployed but you have Rab C Nesbitt as your avatar.

Need I say more ?
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits: Akria,Clippo,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist,MikeUK

Last edited by youcanhandlethetruth; 04-03-2008 at 02:46 PM. Reason: added extra bit
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:05 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,851
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
'Nine in 10 UK jobs go to foreigners' - Telegraph

By the way I'm not racist - just concerned about mass immigration.
Race and nationality are two completely different matters, of course.
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 01:12 AM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,044
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Yes, so what's your point ?
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits: Akria,Clippo,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist,MikeUK
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 07:01 AM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,178
The Bear is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
No wonder the country is going down the toilet if people listen to pro-government views like yours...
Not pro government views, Babushka, simply common sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
In typical New Labour fashion, you've turned round the burden the taxpayer has to endure by supporting immigration into an attack on those who are the most affected by immigration and the problems it creates.
Nothing to do with the New Labour lot, simply a matter of supply and demand.

Fill vacancies with British people, make it a requirement to earn every penny of state aid a person gets unless genuinely incapacitated to do any available work, and the immigration issue will ease overnight.

Better yet get seriously stuck in to a policy or repatriation of those without a 100% watertight eligibility to be IN the UK and place the onus of proof on the applicant and even better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
Most people would say it is the immigrants who are sponging off the state getting handouts, and causing employment problems yet you totally support them.
No, I don't totally support them, I support those who presently come here and work over the lazy don’t work / won’t work scum who are parasites on the rest of us.

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
Your statement "there would not be vacancies that immigrants could fill"
The government are purposefully creating the employment problem, not the unemployed.
Passing the buck again onto the most vulnerable - typical pro-government tactic....
Don’t be silly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
Even if we are to agree with you and your ridiculous suggestion "anyone else who has not demonstrated in some formal way that they are numerate and literate and able to understand what the main parties promote." how much is that going to cost the taxpayer in organizing ?!!!
Actually not all that much. It could be phased in starting with those in their final years at school plus the under 25’s, and then a rolling program introduced to deliver the goods over a number of years.

A
Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
re you suggesting:
People have to pass GCSE maths in order to vote ?
People need to take a "main political parties" test ? [Note also no mention is made of smaller political parties that represent Britains interests a lot more]
Something of more value than a modern GCSE ,and something with a wider base. Not something biased towards academics, but that demonstrated an individuals ability to perform basic math and to understand what principles the main political parties promote.

In addition parliamentary process, the stages of the passage of a bill through The Houses and the British electoral system.

As for the odd sod parties, I would much prefer to see a formal two party state, but if the present system were to remain the smaller parties would be better positioned to present whatever weird and wonderful things they brought to the table by having a better educated and aware electorate to decide on the value of what was being offered.

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
In fact, you're probably contradicting yourself in part by saying people should be able literate, numerate and know about main political parties(!) but also saying "good luck to the Poles for having a say in who rules the country"

How many Poles will have all the criteria you state they should have in order to vote ? How many of them can even speak fluent English to the standard you wish ?
Not very many I imagine.......
Then once again you make an assumption. You have no idea what level of English I am contemplating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
You're trying to re-write the voting process in an unthinkable and totally c*ck handed way - it's no more than typical pro-EU Labour policy and rhetoric.
No, it’s common sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
And you despise the unemployed but you have Rab C Nesbitt as your avatar.
I despise the deliberately unemployed who have decided not to work, and instead sit back and predate off the rest of us.

No work - no pay. No taxes paid - no vote. Rather simple really.

(As for Rab C, he just cracks me up! Like most sensible Scotsmen he’s intrinsically good fun!)
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 07:56 AM   #17 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,851
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
Yes, so what's your point ?
The article you cited was about foreigners.
So why mention race?
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 09:03 AM   #18 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,851
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
I’ve long held the opinion that there should be a more substantial qualification to vote in the UK than there is.
I agree. It brings to mind the Thomas Carlyle quote:
"I do not believe in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance."
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 09:09 AM   #19 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Besoeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,851
Besoeker is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
And you despise the unemployed but you have Rab C Nesbitt as your avatar.
The character gave employment to Gregor Fisher of course.
Besoeker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2008, 03:28 PM   #20 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,044
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker View Post
The article you cited was about foreigners.
So why mention race?
Because like most people in this country, they are branded as racist if they merely mention immigration. But yes, maybe I should not present any prior explanation to appease the politically correct.
The fact remains however that there are a lot of people who are against immigration BUT ALSO racist.
These people are not just concerned about the economic and social problems immigration causes, but they have a loathing of people from other races too.

So nice try for trying it on Besoeker, but there is a distinct difference.
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits: Akria,Clippo,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist,MikeUK
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0