![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,677
![]() |
Having stuck us with a mess of opposing and often violent cultures, we are now hearing the UKIP response - that we must all confirm to a civic idea which will be projected out and enforced by the law. They don't understand that cultures are not creations of a powerful state, but the living expression of a people. They don't realise that their twin Englightenment planks of committment to the idea (USA 1776) and the mistaken notion that ethnic identity is totally indifferent, will inevitably do what all systems that ignore human nature do - turn into a totalitarian state. But of course, like the neo-cons they share so much in common with (without realising), it will be framed in words like 'freedom'. In reality they wish to impose ideological totalitarianism, thinking that by using the tools of state they will change the hearts of the ever-growing Muslim population, so that when that population reaches 20 or 30 million, they will all be nice chaps espousing traditional British ideas, and will not use their numbers to rip apart the secularist constitution that UKIP traitors would thrust on us as they bury the traditional Protestant nation killed by the Lab/Con traitors. But at least we'll be independent! Such a state necessitates a strong government to act as umpire. It is divide and conquer. Even the utilitarian atheist Stuart Mill saw that. UKIP supporters fail to understand that non-whites do not have the enlightenment mentality - that thing which got us into this mess - that they assume in their ivory tower atheism everybody else will gladly accept. Forget South Africa, and the genocide against whites. They cannot point to our inner cities as oasis's of peace, understanding, tolerance, and British civic values, and yet we are not supposed to get alarmed as we literally pile up the funeral pyre for our children who will have to deal with the mess that was made. Their answer? 'you're a racist!' No, because we do not want for outselves what we would not grant to others who aspire for a national homeland where they can live without interference. Only we want to live in accordance with the way nature has made us, and that means living in like communities with shared values, not a multicultural mess or imposed artificial secular mono-culture where people who teach their children the Bible will be sent to prison (yes, it will happen! Richard Dawkins calls for that, and I'm sure Dawkins would be a god to many of them).
Last edited by For_England; 03-10-2007 at 11:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,033
![]() |
Can you elaborate bnpforme on what you claim the UKIP are suggesting ? I didn't really get it in your post.....
You say "confirm to a civic idea which will be projected out and enforced by the law." Can you elaborate further ? You also say "You also say "imposed artificial secular mono-culture where people who teach their children the Bible will be sent to prison" Would someone official from the UKIP like to give an official response to that ? You say "thinking that by using the tools of state they will change the hearts of the ever-growing Muslim population" Personally I don't see a problem with everyone keeping their own culture, identity. Do you or the UKIP object to that ? Our government certainly do ! Let's be clear, whilst there are some islamic extremists, most terrorism is government sponsored terrorism. Please don't ask me to back up my claims - just go on to youtube and watch "terrorstorm"....... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I think you are mistaken that UKIP simply proposes a civic basis of nationalism. I think you will find UKIP also supports cultural nationalism (monoculturalism) to which everybody, regardless of race or religion, should conform. UKIP does NOT, however, support ethnic nationalism which is entirely different and has nothing to do with cultural identity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,677
![]() |
Quote:
harry - what I am talking about is the implications of the 'civic basis' which 'should' be 'conformed' to. On the one hand it is a projected image, because a culture is a natural expression, not a government-imposed idea, and on the other, you will never change the hearts of the Muslim population, and when they have the numbers, they will vote for the natural expression of their own culture - Sharia law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 234
Party: BNP
![]() |
Quote:
However what is clear, and is becoming ever more apparent is that immigrants are not assimilating, just look at the proposed Mosque in East London - yes, we've always had religious freedom in Britain, but we've never been faced with such rapid change, which is totally incongruous with our own culture and heritage. Enoch Powell was a very intelligent man, an honest politician, a rarity in this day and age, and he said all this years ago. Politicians have lied to us, initially immigration was to be temporary, then when people voiced concerns about whites becoming a minority in the 1970s, people laughed and mocked those who voiced such concerns. Now it is evident that it will happen in just a few generations. A vote for anybody other than the BNP is endorsing the very immigration policy that will see the end of Britain as we know it. It's not yet too late, but we haven't much time. The problem is society is mostly comprised of sheeple - the feeble minded - and they will only complain once it effects them directly. From Enoch's Rivers of Blood Speech: Quote:
Quote:
The fact is that the English people will wake up, but it maybe too late, either way if this is not dealt with in time, there will be rivers of blood... Quote:
__________________
"The English gave their name to England and have lived there ever since. People who have since come to England and merged into the English population and are indistinguishable from the English and claim no identity other than English and are accepted by the English as being one of their own, are English." |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,033
![]() |
Quote:
Can you explain what you mean when you say "cultural nationalism (monoculturalism) to which everybody, regardless of race or religion, should conform." ? I'm just interested to learn more about UKIP policy. Many thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 234
Party: BNP
![]() |
Quote:
UKIP are essentially frightened of scaring off mainstream voters and dare not advocate anything that may be deemed politically incorrect. If I were somehow unable to vote BNP, I'd vote Tory, as they're equally likely to address the problem as UKIP, but more likely to be elected.
__________________
"The English gave their name to England and have lived there ever since. People who have since come to England and merged into the English population and are indistinguishable from the English and claim no identity other than English and are accepted by the English as being one of their own, are English." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,677
![]() |
Of course he can't - this is a big dilemna for the liberals. According to their way of thinking, Muslims should just automatically conform, and it goes against their ideology to think that they would ever want to be anything other than good, moral upright British citizens. So they either let it happen, or they begin to talk about 'forcing' them to conform to our way of life - but they must do it in couched language for their own inner sanity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London.
Posts: 2,757
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]