British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > Immigration


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2007, 11:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
For_England's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,677
For_England is just starting out
Default UKIP's Soviet genocidal UK future

Having stuck us with a mess of opposing and often violent cultures, we are now hearing the UKIP response - that we must all confirm to a civic idea which will be projected out and enforced by the law. They don't understand that cultures are not creations of a powerful state, but the living expression of a people. They don't realise that their twin Englightenment planks of committment to the idea (USA 1776) and the mistaken notion that ethnic identity is totally indifferent, will inevitably do what all systems that ignore human nature do - turn into a totalitarian state. But of course, like the neo-cons they share so much in common with (without realising), it will be framed in words like 'freedom'. In reality they wish to impose ideological totalitarianism, thinking that by using the tools of state they will change the hearts of the ever-growing Muslim population, so that when that population reaches 20 or 30 million, they will all be nice chaps espousing traditional British ideas, and will not use their numbers to rip apart the secularist constitution that UKIP traitors would thrust on us as they bury the traditional Protestant nation killed by the Lab/Con traitors. But at least we'll be independent! Such a state necessitates a strong government to act as umpire. It is divide and conquer. Even the utilitarian atheist Stuart Mill saw that. UKIP supporters fail to understand that non-whites do not have the enlightenment mentality - that thing which got us into this mess - that they assume in their ivory tower atheism everybody else will gladly accept. Forget South Africa, and the genocide against whites. They cannot point to our inner cities as oasis's of peace, understanding, tolerance, and British civic values, and yet we are not supposed to get alarmed as we literally pile up the funeral pyre for our children who will have to deal with the mess that was made. Their answer? 'you're a racist!' No, because we do not want for outselves what we would not grant to others who aspire for a national homeland where they can live without interference. Only we want to live in accordance with the way nature has made us, and that means living in like communities with shared values, not a multicultural mess or imposed artificial secular mono-culture where people who teach their children the Bible will be sent to prison (yes, it will happen! Richard Dawkins calls for that, and I'm sure Dawkins would be a god to many of them).

Last edited by For_England; 03-10-2007 at 11:14 PM.
For_England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 04-10-2007, 04:11 AM   #2 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,033
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Can you elaborate bnpforme on what you claim the UKIP are suggesting ? I didn't really get it in your post.....
You say "confirm to a civic idea which will be projected out and enforced by the law."
Can you elaborate further ?

You also say "You also say "imposed artificial secular mono-culture where people who teach their children the Bible will be sent to prison"

Would someone official from the UKIP like to give an official response to that ?

You say "thinking that by using the tools of state they will change the hearts of the ever-growing Muslim population"
Personally I don't see a problem with everyone keeping their own culture, identity. Do you or the UKIP object to that ? Our government certainly do !
Let's be clear, whilst there are some islamic extremists, most terrorism is government sponsored terrorism.
Please don't ask me to back up my claims - just go on to youtube and watch "terrorstorm".......
youcanhandlethetruth is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 07:46 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,910
harryaldridge is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to harryaldridge
Default

I think you are mistaken that UKIP simply proposes a civic basis of nationalism. I think you will find UKIP also supports cultural nationalism (monoculturalism) to which everybody, regardless of race or religion, should conform. UKIP does NOT, however, support ethnic nationalism which is entirely different and has nothing to do with cultural identity.
__________________
http://vindicovindico.blogspot.com
Vote Harry Aldridge (PPC and MEP)
harryaldridge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 02:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
For_England's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,677
For_England is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harryaldridge View Post
I think you are mistaken that UKIP simply proposes a civic basis of nationalism. I think you will find UKIP also supports cultural nationalism (monoculturalism) to which everybody, regardless of race or religion, should conform. UKIP does NOT, however, support ethnic nationalism which is entirely different and has nothing to do with cultural identity.
youcanhandlethetruth - this is the kind of sentiment which UKIPers endorse, and you can find it alot on here.

harry - what I am talking about is the implications of the 'civic basis' which 'should' be 'conformed' to. On the one hand it is a projected image, because a culture is a natural expression, not a government-imposed idea, and on the other, you will never change the hearts of the Muslim population, and when they have the numbers, they will vote for the natural expression of their own culture - Sharia law.
For_England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 08:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Like The Roman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 234
Party: BNP
Like The Roman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnpforme View Post
youcanhandlethetruth - this is the kind of sentiment which UKIPers endorse, and you can find it alot on here.

harry - what I am talking about is the implications of the 'civic basis' which 'should' be 'conformed' to. On the one hand it is a projected image, because a culture is a natural expression, not a government-imposed idea, and on the other, you will never change the hearts of the Muslim population, and when they have the numbers, they will vote for the natural expression of their own culture - Sharia law.
You're quite right, of course. UKIP are essentially another politically correct party (ie. they adhere to the tenets of social marxism), they represent superficial change.

However what is clear, and is becoming ever more apparent is that immigrants are not assimilating, just look at the proposed Mosque in East London - yes, we've always had religious freedom in Britain, but we've never been faced with such rapid change, which is totally incongruous with our own culture and heritage. Enoch Powell was a very intelligent man, an honest politician, a rarity in this day and age, and he said all this years ago.

Politicians have lied to us, initially immigration was to be temporary, then when people voiced concerns about whites becoming a minority in the 1970s, people laughed and mocked those who voiced such concerns. Now it is evident that it will happen in just a few generations.

A vote for anybody other than the BNP is endorsing the very immigration policy that will see the end of Britain as we know it. It's not yet too late, but we haven't much time. The problem is society is mostly comprised of sheeple - the feeble minded - and they will only complain once it effects them directly.

From Enoch's Rivers of Blood Speech:

Quote:
In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's Office. There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London.
Pretty accurate.

Quote:
To be integrated into a populationThe other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word "integration." means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members. Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction. But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.

We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population - that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate.
When I discussed this very thing with a Kenyan friend of mine at uinersity, he remarked "we're not here to integrate, we want a better satndard of living".

The fact is that the English people will wake up, but it maybe too late, either way if this is not dealt with in time, there will be rivers of blood...

Quote:
Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen." Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.
At least I won't be here, then.
__________________
"The English gave their name to England and have lived there ever since. People who have since come to England and merged into the English population and are indistinguishable from the English and claim no identity other than English and are accepted by the English as being one of their own, are English."
Like The Roman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 10:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,033
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harryaldridge View Post
I think you are mistaken that UKIP simply proposes a civic basis of nationalism. I think you will find UKIP also supports cultural nationalism (monoculturalism) to which everybody, regardless of race or religion, should conform. UKIP does NOT, however, support ethnic nationalism which is entirely different and has nothing to do with cultural identity.
Harry,

Can you explain what you mean when you say "cultural nationalism (monoculturalism) to which everybody, regardless of race or religion, should conform." ? I'm just interested to learn more about UKIP policy.

Many thanks.
youcanhandlethetruth is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 10:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Like The Roman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 234
Party: BNP
Like The Roman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
Harry,

Can you explain what you mean when you say "cultural nationalism (monoculturalism) to which everybody, regardless of race or religion, should conform." ? I'm just interested to learn more about UKIP policy.

Many thanks.
He can't answer you, because there isn't a solution! If there is I shall post it on every Islamic forum I can find, to gauge the reaction - I'd like to see muslims' opinions.

UKIP are essentially frightened of scaring off mainstream voters and dare not advocate anything that may be deemed politically incorrect. If I were somehow unable to vote BNP, I'd vote Tory, as they're equally likely to address the problem as UKIP, but more likely to be elected.
__________________
"The English gave their name to England and have lived there ever since. People who have since come to England and merged into the English population and are indistinguishable from the English and claim no identity other than English and are accepted by the English as being one of their own, are English."
Like The Roman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 12:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
For_England's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,677
For_England is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Like The Roman View Post
He can't answer you, because there isn't a solution! If there is I shall post it on every Islamic forum I can find, to gauge the reaction - I'd like to see muslims' opinions.
Of course he can't - this is a big dilemna for the liberals. According to their way of thinking, Muslims should just automatically conform, and it goes against their ideology to think that they would ever want to be anything other than good, moral upright British citizens. So they either let it happen, or they begin to talk about 'forcing' them to conform to our way of life - but they must do it in couched language for their own inner sanity.
For_England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 12:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,096
Independence Now! is just starting out
Default

[deleted For Promoting The Bnp Contrary To Forum Rules]

Last edited by Tom Wilde; 08-10-2007 at 12:44 AM.
Independence Now! is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 12:43 AM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Tom Wilde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London.
Posts: 2,757
Tom Wilde is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnpforme View Post
Of course he can't - this is a big dilemna for the liberals. According to their way of thinking, Muslims should just automatically conform, and it goes against their ideology to think that they would ever want to be anything other than good, moral upright British citizens. So they either let it happen, or they begin to talk about 'forcing' them to conform to our way of life - but they must do it in couched language for their own inner sanity.
Well I'm a liberal, and I don't want Muslims to "just automatically conform". Why should you want to impose your morality or your way of life on them? Are you so insecure in your own culture that you feel the need to force it down other peoples throats? Let them to follow their faith and live as they see fit - and let the rest of us have the same freedom as well. We've all got to follow the same laws - but those laws should be drawn so as to leave room for people to live their own lives the way they please, so long as they don't harm others.
Tom Wilde is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0