![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
![]() |
The latest asylum figures have been published
:http://www.teletext.co.uk/news/natio...m+figures.aspx Last edited by Britannist; 21-08-2007 at 01:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
![]() |
I was changing it to one that did work while you were posting the above.
They obviously changed the link to a new address just as I put the one they had just abandoned in my posting. You can also read the report (on the link in the first posting to my thread) on page 306 of ITV 1 Teletext (viewable on most televisions) by the way (at least until they move that too). Last edited by Britannist; 21-08-2007 at 01:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Little Poland On Sea (Bournemouth)
Posts: 679
![]() |
Tara wrote:
Quote:
Besides, why would Gordy spend good money chucking potential Liebour voters out. Much cheaper to amnesty 'em. ![]() ![]()
__________________
If anyone complains about unlimited mass immigration we call them a racist - it's our culture! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
![]() |
The mass influx we see in our country is supported (in private) by a large section of Brown's Lie-bour Party. Nearly all illegal immigrants are in England (not Wales or Scotland) which is exactly the way Lie-bour wants it - preferably in key marginal seats.
We managed to stop the enemy getting into this country in World War II - no one would have got across the Channel easily to illegally enter our land then. Yet now, this shower in power claim admit there are hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants here and that they did all they could to stop them coming in. What nonsense. The real figure is probably well over a million and Lie-bour barely moved a muscle to stop the inflow For all their talk, Lie-bour is not going to remove most of them. If half a million of them get an amnesty Lie-bour expects that they will gratefully return the favour in the polling booths (as ZZ says in the last posting to this thread) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London.
Posts: 2,750
![]() |
The long posting I just made seems to have been obliterated by this forum's wonderful new software. I can't be bothered to retype it all, but here is a link to a newspaper report on the asylum numbers.
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homea...153255,00.html Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Little Poland On Sea (Bournemouth)
Posts: 679
![]() |
Now geography never was my strong point, but do we actually share borders with Eritrea, Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia and China?
![]() I always thought a refugee/asylum seeker was someone who crossed the first safe border. Maybe my atlas is out of date?
__________________
If anyone complains about unlimited mass immigration we call them a racist - it's our culture! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]