British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > Immigration
WTF!!! WTF!!!
Register Social Groups Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
Page 3 of 7 < 12 3 45 > Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2006, 12:32 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies
Whatever you say.
It's not what I say it's what your party says.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 08-12-2006, 01:58 PM   #22 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 272
Soddball is just starting out
Default
Unlikely since he's claiming a breach of his human rights, which is a piece of EU legislation tagged on to our law. Were there to be a UKIP government that piece of legislation wouldn't be in place and he would, thus, be unable to claim.
Soddball is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 02:07 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soddball
Unlikely since he's claiming a breach of his human rights, which is a piece of EU legislation tagged on to our law. Were there to be a UKIP government that piece of legislation wouldn't be in place and he would, thus, be unable to claim.
He would still have the right to appeal as many did before we adopted the European Human Rights act.
Of course under a Nationalist government he wouldnt have been here at all and a young girl wouldnt have had her life ruined.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 03:34 PM   #24 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 272
Soddball is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soddball
Unlikely since he's claiming a breach of his human rights, which is a piece of EU legislation tagged on to our law. Were there to be a UKIP government that piece of legislation wouldn't be in place and he would, thus, be unable to claim.
He would still have the right to appeal as many did before we adopted the European Human Rights act.
Of course under a Nationalist government he wouldnt have been here at all and a young girl wouldnt have had her life ruined.
Aren't all governments required under the UN Fundamental Charter on human rights to allow those claiming asylum to enter the country? Going to pull out of the UN now? Isolationist is not the word.
Soddball is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 04:17 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soddball
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soddball
Unlikely since he's claiming a breach of his human rights, which is a piece of EU legislation tagged on to our law. Were there to be a UKIP government that piece of legislation wouldn't be in place and he would, thus, be unable to claim.
He would still have the right to appeal as many did before we adopted the European Human Rights act.
Of course under a Nationalist government he wouldnt have been here at all and a young girl wouldnt have had her life ruined.
Aren't all governments required under the UN Fundamental Charter on human rights to allow those claiming asylum to enter the country? Going to pull out of the UN now? Isolationist is not the word.
No need to pull out the UN just the UN Charter of Human Rights.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 04:17 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Even Camerons Wolly Liberal Tories have suggested this.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 05:06 PM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,056
Unionist has some supporters
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
No need to pull out the UN just the UN Charter of Human Rights.
So have I got this right - you reject all asylum claims, irrespective of whether they are valid? Is that correct?
Unionist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 06:05 PM   #28 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,850
kernow has some supporters
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England

would bring in new laws that that say when an Asylum Seekers claim fails he is deported without any right to appeal?
Definitely! I would have them on the very next flight out!
kernow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 06:19 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,682
This-England is just starting out
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unionist
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
No need to pull out the UN just the UN Charter of Human Rights.
So have I got this right - you reject all asylum claims, irrespective of whether they are valid? Is that correct?
Yes.
Unless of course they are men of British stock from say Zimbabwe/Rhodesia.
This-England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 06:30 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,056
Unionist has some supporters
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unionist
Quote:
Originally Posted by This-England
No need to pull out the UN just the UN Charter of Human Rights.
So have I got this right - you reject all asylum claims, irrespective of whether they are valid? Is that correct?
Yes.
Unless of course they are men of British stock from say Zimbabwe/Rhodesia.
So your policy - correct me if I'm wrong - adds up to:

- No immigration
- No asylum (unless of "British stock")
- Protectionism in place of free trade
- Nationalisation of the major industries
- Leaving NATO
- Dissolving the UK

What party would best represent your views, do you think?
Unionist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 7 < 12 3 45 > Last »

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54 PM.

Contact Us - British Democracy Forum - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0