English-Patriot

Most English Democrats are against the Multiracial society.

morlock

....But the official party policy is in favour of it!! How then can such people be part of an organisation that is in opposition to such a fundamental belief that will see the extinction of the people they claim to represent?

landmarker

Isn't it too late to rail against this?
The genie is out of the bottle and it wont go back in unless faced with extreme violence. We cannot look for this as a society surely?

Multi-culturalism is the problem here. Even Trevor Phillips, head of the race relations 'industry' concedes this point.

At one point seeing the likes of Amir Khan, the young boxer from Bolton waving a Union Jack might have stuck in my gullet but now?.....all we can ask is those that have settled here embrace Britain and British life and culture (such as it is) We might even learn something from the the more postitive aspects of their cultures. All this said, we must remember Britain has become largely, thru' natural evolution a post religious society. Guest and settlers must not be allowed to impose mumbo-jumbo religions upon the people here or demand special privileges to accommodate this nonsense. Live and let live, by all means , but do not impose your beliefs , practices or narrow prejudices on this welcoming host. The welcome is by no means unanimous so don't push yer luck.

girlfriday

The real genie out of the bottle in my view, is the awakening of English identity. On posts by myself elsewhere on this forum and others, the English constitute the largest ethnic minority in both Scotland and Wales, and by various incarnations, the largest ethnic majority in England (sources 2001 census). It is not therefore unreasonable in the near future, for ALL political parties to have to justify how they treat the ethnic English in Britain.

As it stands, minorities are protected by law; religious minorities, Jews and Sikhs, racial minorities, as determined by the darkness of your skin. These people have become in Hindu terms "untouchables". There is no protection for definitive ethnic majority, except in Wales and Scotland were there is recognition of some kind of national identity. England has been bypassed.

Ultimately ALL legislation that discriminates against English people specifically, such as all post 60's race laws that aim to be pro-active for non-whites and in the case of the English, particularly discriminatory, shall have to be repealed. If any long term race balance is to be achieved without bloodshed, then the state, the political system, the law enforcement agencies, and all other public and private bodies must recognise the majority status of the English by language, birth and lineage. failure to do so, will simply light the fuse to future inter-ethnic relations.

Britannist

I agree with Girl Friday (who posted to this thread at 9.4.2006 at 7.06 pm). All forms of anti-English prejudice must be made illegal. And that should include making the anti-Englishness promoted by the Labour Party and the BBC on offence in law.

We need English-only voting on English-only issues in the House of Commons as well as a Minister for England in Government. The English flag must be flown on all public buildings (by law). There must also be a fairer distribution of immigrants coming INTO phpbb_the UK putting strains on public services/housing and private rented property. Most come to England, and a large majority of those head for London/Home Counties. It must a condition that more of the immigrants (coming INTO phpbb_the UK legally) consider work in Scotland – preferably in the constituencies of europhile Labour/Liberal ‘Democrat’ and Scottish National Party MP’s in the Commons (who appear to be more than keen that the immigrants come here as long as its not in their part of the UK). Fair is fair after all.

Mikeuk

Undoubtedly Trevor Phillips talks a good deal of sense, although I think his erstwhile puppetmasters have by now marked his card.

I have no problem with that. I'm delighted that this young man loves and respects his adopted country.

But I'm more concerned about the many other Asians - often actually born here - who are determined to massacre their own fellow-citizens.

The people are deeply concerned about mass immigration. The idea that they are not is a PC lie - almost identical to the one we have heard so long 'Everybody's bored with Europe'

The truth is that BNP advances in recent years have terrified the left, so the lie factory is pumped up. Lynton Crosby saved the Tories' bacon at the last election with slogans such as 'it's not racist to impose limits on immigration". The lie factor controllers reacted by putting the traitor Cameron in charge of an emasculated Tory Party.

But what the left are really frightened of is a strong anti-immigration challenge from a respectable non-racist party such as UKIP. No wonder Cameron was used to launch an attack in an attempt to brand UKIP 'racist'. But the puppetmasters goofed. Wet-behind-the-ears Cameron blew it.

The opportunity is now unfolding for a full-blown non-racist populist attack on mass immigration. Now that the Tories have been exposed as the traitors they are, the way lies open for a virile, hard-hitting UKIP to take the lead.

If Lynton Crosby could be recruited to UKIP it would be a marvellous step forward.

Britannist

Mike UK wrote above: Lynton Crosby saved the Tories' bacon at the last election with slogans such as 'it's not racist to impose limits on immigration".

My reply: True - without a doubt. The Conservatives came close to to winning back Crawley and Harlow (missing out to 'Tony' B-liar's Lie-bour at Harlow - the seat of a europhile Lie-bour minister ('Bill' Rammell) by 97 votes - and at Crawley by just 37 votes). In both those seats, many people backed the Conservatives because they thought (rightly) that immigration under this shambolic excuse for a Government was out of control. Had the immigration issue not been used Labour would have held both seats with majorities well INTO phpbb_the thousands.

eublues

Quite amusing that Cameron decides to renounce policies that the Tories had for the 2005 election that were perfectly sensible (eg opposing uncontrolled immigration, doing something about the NHS, at least seeking to repatriate some powers for Brussels) in favour of becoming like new labour, just before it comes clearer to the public than ever before that new labour is thoroughly useless and corrupt.

adrianwainer

Immigration Good or Bad

I would argue that immigration is neither inherently good nor inherently bad, it depends on the nature of the people who are doing the immigration and the nature of the society they are makeing the immigration in to.

To allow people to immigrate in to the United Kingdom who believe that they have a right to exterminate the indigenous population of the United Kingdom because they are not Muslims, is not a policy which is rational except if suicide is the objective.

Furthermore I rather suspect the recent debate about the distribution of resources between indigenous Britons and newly arrived immigrants, has been cooked-up by new Labour and other Elites to detract attention from the above issue of the attempted extermination of the indigenous population of the United Kingdom.

The Times April 24, 2006

What the neo-Nazi fanatic did next: switched to Islam
By Nicola Woolcock and Dominic Kenned

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...149297,00.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Hartlepool

Do you mean both of them?