Immigration

Mikeuk · 29-08-2005, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WindupMerchant

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wahoo

Matt? Matt who?

mkpdavies

Isn't it Matt Finish :?:

mkpdavies · 29-08-2005, 09:12 PM

Door Matt
Beer Matt
Welcome Matt
Matt Tress

Heard em all before.

WindupMerchant · 29-08-2005, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Door Matt
Beer Matt
Welcome Matt
Matt Tress

Heard em all before.

What's the matter :?:

mkpdavies · 29-08-2005, 09:32 PM

Nothing. Just letting everyone know the other popular uses of Matt. My mother-in-law finds it funny too and what keeps her happy, keeps me happy!

WindupMerchant · 29-08-2005, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Nothing. Just letting everyone know the other popular uses of Matt. My mother-in-law finds it funny too and what keeps her happy, keeps me happy!

I get on well with my matther-in-law too, she lives 400 miles away

johnwest · 02-09-2005, 02:39 PM

Fortunately my mother in law was kidnapped by aliens years ago. The last I heard she was ruling Mars.

arden forester · 25-09-2005, 10:29 PM

So as a follow-up to Forrest Gump we will get Forrest Mars? :roll:
http://www.goodbyemag.com/jul99/mars.html

Anthony Butcher · 27-10-2005, 02:14 AM

http://www.guardian.co.uk/immigratio...601549,00.html

Quote:

The government can be sure of the whereabouts of only 25% of the estimated 200,000-250,000 failed asylum seekers currently in Britain, the Home Office said last night.
Sir John Gieve, the outgoing permanent secretary at the Home Office, also said he would not "bet his mortgage" on the government meeting the prime minister's December deadline for ensuring that the number of rejected asylum seekers removed from the country each month exceeded the number of new claims.

Speaking to the Commons all-party public accounts committee, Jeremy Oppenheim of the National Asylum Seeker Support Service said the Home Office knew the addresses of "nearly all" the families whose claims for asylum had been rejected because they were claiming benefits. But he admitted that such families comprised "probably about 25%" of the 200,000 to 250,000 rejected asylum seekers now living in the country.
Sir John Gieve said that while the Home Office had addresses for the remaining 75%, it was impossible to guarantee they would be there when immigration enforcement officers called. He also told MPs that although the immigration service was "on the verge" of meeting the government's asylum deportations target set by Tony Blair he could not guarantee that it would be met by December.

While admitting that there had been a "severe problem and loss of control" in the asylum system, Sir John said progress has been made in the past two years with a sharp reduction in the number of fresh asylum seekers and increasing numbers of those who were rejected being sent home. He told the committee fresh asylum claims were running at 2,000 a month in June with removals running at 1,300 a month and rising."I don't know if I would go so far as to say I expect to hit [the target]," he said. "We're pretty clear we're going to hit it in the next few months, I just don't know whether we're going to hit it before the end of the year."

He told the MPs they had to realise the difficulties involved in trying to deport rejected asylum seekers with compulsory removals not possible to Iraq, Somalia and Zimbabwe and now, because of the earthquake, Pakistan.

He also said some foreign countries were working to frustrate attempts to send failed asylum seekers back.

A Home Office spokeswoman said last night: "We have significantly reduced asylum applications and have increased the proportion of failed asylum seekers we return. In 1996 the number of removals was equivalent to only 20% of predicted unfounded claims, now that proportion is around 50%."

She added: "While progress has been made we know there is more to do which is why measures to increase and speed up removals are at the heart of our five year strategy on asylum and immigration published in February."

mkpdavies · 31-10-2005, 07:39 AM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/4391766.stm

Quote:

The Commission for Racial Equality has said that the Scottish Executive is no doing enought to help new immigrants to integrate INTO phpbb_the community.

Looks like they got an immigrant with fairly poor English in to do this report.

Quote:

It recommends a bigger focus on making Scottish communities more welcoming and respectful of newcomers and also calls for greater economic diversity.

Nasty Scottish people. They need educating on being nicer.
:roll:

mkpdavies · 31-10-2005, 09:58 AM

http://www.optimumpopulation.org/opt.media.html

Quote:

The UK is on course for a “massively unsustainable” rise in its population, with the publication of figures today (Thursday, Oct 20, 2005) showing that population growth rates are accelerating and predicting that the country’s population will grow by seven million over the next quarter-century and at least 10 million over the next six decades, according to the Optimum Population Trust.

Revised projections from the Government Actuary's Department, published today by the Office of National Statistics, suggest that the UK’s population, currently 60.2 million, will grow to over 67 million by 2031 and to 70.7 million by 2074. A population rise of 10.5 million is equivalent to roughly one-and-a-half more Londons or 57 more Lutons (population 184,000).

70 million people and rising.

Water rationing.

Road Rationing.

Refuse Tax.

More highrise flats.

More building on Greenbelt.

Higher housing costs.

More inner city ghetto's.

More stress and pressure.

Massive problems with jobs, when the economy takes a dive.

I think we all owe our children and grand children a massive appology for not stopping this.

29-08-2005, 09:12 PM	#42 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	Door Matt Beer Matt Welcome Matt Matt Tress Heard em all before. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

29-08-2005, 09:32 PM	#44 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	Nothing. Just letting everyone know the other popular uses of Matt. My mother-in-law finds it funny too and what keeps her happy, keeps me happy! __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

25-09-2005, 10:29 PM	#47 (permalink)
arden forester Uber Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Solihull, in The Forest of Arden, Warwickshire! Posts: 2,660 Party: None	So as a follow-up to Forrest Gump we will get Forrest Mars? :roll: http://www.goodbyemag.com/jul99/mars.html __________________ www.ardenforester.blogspot.com www.westminster-whispers.blogspot.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-09-2005, 02:39 PM	#46 (permalink)
johnwest Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Suffolk Posts: 827 Party: UKIP	Fortunately my mother in law was kidnapped by aliens years ago. The last I heard she was ruling Mars.